vol. 28, no. 12

Primary tabs

a,


American


Civil Liberties -


Union


f


Volume XXVIII


SAN FRANCISCO, DECEMBER, 1963


Adolescent Homosexual Episodes.


siearance


Granted in


Security Case


The Central Industrial Personnel Access Authorization


Board on November 7 after a hearing in San Francisco last


June 27 and 28, tentatively granted a Secret Clearance to an


individual who had been charged with homosexual activi-


the Board denied him a Top


Secret clearance. Since neither


the Government nor the indi-


vidual have requested a further


hearing in the matter, the ten-


tative decision will now become


final. - :


Five Instances :


In his written answer to the


charges, he stated that "as a


child of 10 or 11, and during a


period of approximately ONE


YEAR, while sharing the same


bed with my older brother, I


engaged in sex play of various


kinds with him, which termi-


nated when we secured sep-


arate beds. Otherwise, there


have been exactly five instances


in which I engaged in homo-


sexual acts and these occurred


during my Navy career over a


period of less than one year,


starting in late 1953 and termi-. -


nating prior to my release from


the Navy in August 1954. At the


time these incidents occurred


I was about 22 years of age."


The individual has been mar-


ried for nine years, and has


three children. His friends and


his wife rallied to his support


and testified at the hearing or


submitted affidavits saying he


was reliable, trustworthy and


not a security risk despite his


past actions.


Psychiatric Support


Two eminent psychiatrists, Dr.


Karl M. Bowman and Dr. Nor-


man Reider both interviewed the


individual and furnished expert


opinions. in his behalf. Dr. Bow-


man's statement concluded by


saying, "that in my opinion Mr.


cee w-- IS not intrinsically a


homosexual. I think that his at-


titude is essentially heterosexual


and the record of the past 10


ties at the age of 22, about 10 years ago. At the same time,


years demonstrates this. Every-


one who has made careful


`studies of sexual development in


human beings knows that a num-


ber of homosexual episodes dur-


ing childhood and adolescence


are extremely common and that


the individual usually outgrows


them. I see nothing here to sug-


gest to me that this individual


has a deep seated homosexuality


which is likely to break out again


and from my study of him and


record as available to me I would


consider that he would be a good


security risk."


: Not Unusual


The ACLU argued that the


kind of conduct that the indi-


-vidual engaged in at the age of


22 is typical of 37% of the total


male population, and if he were


to be screened from his job


"solely because of such activities,


the government would have to


get rid of 2 out of 5 employees


who have aecess. to classified


military information. As for the


sex play which oceurred during


childhood, apparently this is so


commonplace it involves most of


the male population. -


- During the five years he had


had access to classified military


information there were no com-


plaints against him. The issue


arose because his company made


an application for a top secret


clearance for him. His security


clearance was withdrawn last


February 15 and ought to be


restored to him by December 15.


This is pretty fast action for the


Army, under whose jurisdiction


the program operates. The


ACLU has another case in which


the lengthy hearings were con-


-Continued on Page 4


Santa Cruz Sponsors


High School Contest


The Santa Cruz County Chapter of ACLUNC last month


announced a Civil Liberties Competition for all high school


students in Santa Cruz county. The Chapter will award up to


$300 in prize money for the best entries on the topic "The


Bill of Rights and My Future." This theme may be expressed


through an essay, poem, speech,


cartoon, painting, photograph,


musical composition or other me-


dium. :


The high schools involved in


the competition are Santa Cruz,


Watsonville, San Lorenzo Valley,


Soquel and Holy Cross High


School in Santa Cruz.


The winners in each of the divi-


sions and the Grand Prize winner


will be announced on Human


Rights Day, December 10. Mary


Duffield, a member of the Santa


Cruz High School faculty and a


member of the local ACLU chap-


ter is coordinating the contest.


A special fund raising party


will be held on December 7 at the


home of Al Johnson, 338 Alta St.,


Santa Cruz at 6 p.m. Buffet din-


ner will be served, after which


there will be an art exhibit and


art items will be auctioned, with


all proceeds going for the Civil


Liberties Competition. -


At the recent annual meeting


of the Santa Cruz County Chapter


the following persons were elect-


ed to the Board of Directors: Her-


man Beck, Bates Elliott, Herbert


Foster, Robert Hall, Dr. Duncan


Holbert, Al Johnson, Margaret


Lezin, John Lingemann, Dan Mil-


ler, Dr. Marvin J. Naman, Dr.


' Kenneth Neary, Ann Read, Man-


uel Santana, L. B. Schaeffer,


Stanley Stevens, Fern Tobey and


Frank Woods. Messrs. Johnson,


Neary, Schaeffer and Tobey are


new additions to the board.


Chapter Officers


The board re-elected Stanley D.


Stevens as its Chairman, Dan Mil-


ler as Vice-Chairman, Herman


Beck as Treasurer, Dr. Marvin J.


Naman as Membership Chairman


and Manuel Santana as Program


Chairman, Mrs. Ann Read suc-


eeeds Myra McLoughlin as Secre-


tary. a.


Number 12


High Court


Prohibits Tel.


Co. Damage Suit


On November 5 the Supreme


Court of California filed its opin-


ion in the proceedings brought


by the Pacific Telephone and


Telegraph Company to prohibit


further proceedings in San Fran-


cisco Superior Court in Edgar


Sokol's ACLU-supported damage


action against the Company. The


high court did not indicate


whether it was of the opinion


that Sokol could or could not


eventually obtain a trial of- his


action for damages arising out of


the removal of his telephones


without notice or hearing. What


the Supreme Court did hold is


-that the trial court did not now


have jurisdiction over the action


because a`decision of the Public


Utilities Commission in an unre-


lated 1948 case ordered that a


Telephone Company was immune


from damages so long as it acted


on a letter from a law enforce-


ment official and regardless of


the letter's accuracy.


ACLU's Concern


The ACLU's concern in this


ease arises from the fact that


every telephone in California, ac-


cording to the 1948 P.U.C. order,


may be instantly removed with-


out any liability on the part of


the utility or notice or chance


to present a defense to the sub-


seriber if the utility receives a


letter from a law enforcement


officer stating that the phones


are being used for an illegal pur-


pose or to sid and abet an illegal


purpose. The procedure in the


Sokol case shows that the Tele-


phone Company invariably acts


on such a letter and makes no


independent investigation of the


truth or substantiality of the


charges.


Constitutional Argument


In the superior court and in


the Supreme Court ACLU's coun-


sel Marshall Krause assisted by


volunteer counsel Leo Borregard


argued that this procedure allows


the taking of property (right to


have a telephone) without due


process of law and without com-


pensation for its loss. Superior


Court Judge Joseph Karesh


agreed with these contentions


and refused to apply the Tele-


-phone Company's proffered de-


fense. The Supreme Court did


not reach the _ constitutional


questions but merely held that


the Superior Court had no juris-


diction to fail to apply pertinent


PUC orders.


Rehearing Sought


Sokol now has pending a peti-


tion for rehearing in the high


court asking that that Court itself


rule on the constitutional issues


since it is under no jurisdictional


impediment comparable to that


of the Superior Court. If the


Court declines to do this the pe-


tition asks that its opinion be


modified so as to indicate in what


way Sokol can protect his consti-


tutional rights. Two of the Jus-


tices (Schauer and Peters) stated


that the issue "can be finally ad-


judicated" but did not say how.


Complaint With PUC .


The ACLU had also filed a com-


plaint with the PUC asking that


its 1948 decision be set aside


which may be what the Supreme


Court has in mind. The petition


also asks that the finality of the


Court's action be stayed pending


a hearing on the new PUC com-


plaint so that if it is successful


Sokol will still have an action to


procure compensation for his


loss.


Perpetuating Racial Segregation


Gr


Governor Edmund G. Brown last month urged Califor-


nia voters to boycott the initiative now being circulated


whose purpose is to nullify California's new Fair Housing


Law. He denounced the proposal `as dangerous and inflam-


matory.". It is sponsored by the California Real Estate


Association and other real estate


groups. In order to get the meas-


ure on the ballot, the sponsors


must file petitions bearing the


valid signatures of 468,259 regis-


tered voters.


Perpetuating Segregation


The proposal seeks to perpetu-


ate racial segregation in the hous-


ing field. It bars the Legislature


from enacting laws to limit the


right of any person to sell, lease


or rent his real property to any


person or persons as he chooses.


While it speaks in terms of free-


dom for property owners to rent,


lease or dispose of their property


it really seeks to ghettoize and


restrict the freedom of racial mi-


norities. It is a blatant attempt


of the majority 1o tyrannize over


the minority, Although the pro-


posal is of doubtful validity under


the Fourteenth Amendment to


the Federal Constitution, if it


gets on the ballot it is bound to


stir up serious racial strife in the


community. It is one of the most


Membership


Stands at


Record 5471


The ACLU of Northern Califor-


nia ended its fiscal year on Octo-


ber 31, 1963, with a net gain of


245 members. In making this


gain, the membership climbed to


a record 5471 paid up members


from 5226 a year ago. There are


also 208 separate subscribers to


the monthly "News,' compared


with 225 a year ago.


During the past three years,


the membership has jumped from


4576 to 5471, a gain of 795 mem-


bers. During this same period,


the names of 1779 members have


been added to our dead rolls-an


average of 593 members. Such


persons are lost to the ACLU be-


cause they move from the area,


fail to notify us of a change of


address, lose interest, resign, die,


etc. In other words, in order just


to stand still, almost 600 members


must be added each year. Every-


thing above that figure repre-


sents growth.


At the end of the fiscal year


there were also 519 names on


what the ACLUNC chooses to eall


its "dormant" list of members-


those whose membership lapsed


sometime during the past six


months (mostly in September and


October). Most of these members


will renew but it may take as


much as six months before they


do so.


-M. W. K.


Dr. Taylor's


Speech on


KPFA Dec. 9


Radio Station KPFA in Berke-


ley will broadcast Dr. Harold


Taylor's October 27 speech to


the 29th Annual Meeting of the


ACLUNC on Monday evening,


`December 9, at 7:15 o'clock. The


speech is entitled `Social Change


and Political Crisis.''


Ernest Besig's report on "The


State of the Union,' delivered at


the same meeting, will be broad-


cast by Station KPFA on Tues-


day evening, December 10, at


10 o'clock.


divisive proposals that has been


made in a long time.


The California Real Estate


Commission, all of whose mem-


bers belong to the Association,


have joined Governor Brown in


supporting the present Fair


Housing Law and in opposing


the initiative. Also, 45 members


of the California Real Estate


Board in the bay area recently


formed a group called California


Realtors for Fair Housing which


will oppose the initiative and


similar organizations are being


formed in Los Angeles, Palo Al-


to, Fresno and Modesto.


The growing campaign to boy-


cott the initiative has also se-


cured the unanimous support of


the Richmond City Council and of


the Palo Alto Fair Play Council.


The Board of Rabbis of Northern


California have condemned the


initiative as "a movement which


aims to entrench prejudice and


discrimination."


Spearhead of Opposition


Spearheading the boycott movea-


ment is the California Committee


for Fair Practices, headed by C.


L. Dellums and supported by hun-


dreds of civic, labor and religious


leaders. The group's northern


California office is located in the


Labor Temple, 2940-16th Street,


Room 212, San Francisco (MAr-


ket 1-7742). :


The Committee is convening a


state-wide Conference in Los An-


geles on December 14, 1963 at the


Wilshire Christian Church, 63%


So. Normandie, from 9:30 a.m. to


5:00 p.m. to plan strategy and a


program of action to oppose the


initiative, The group is urgently


in need of funds to carry on the


boycott campaign.


Arguments Against Initiative


The Bay Area Human Rela-


tions Committee has summed up


the arguments against putting the


initiative on the ballot as fol-


lows:


1. It will put the housing in-


dustry (and California) in the po-


sition of trying to ``turn the clock


back" in race relations and jus-


tice.


2. It will put the industry (and


California) in the position of not


affording the Rumford law a


fair trial.


3. The initiative campaign is


based on misinformation and mis-


conceptions about the law. The


Rumford law is not a "forced


housing" law in any way. It does-


n't force anyone to sell or rent te


minorities. The law doesn't force


anyone to abandon whatever fi-


nancial, cultural, educational or


personal criteria for buyers or


renters they want to set up-as


long as these criteria are applied


to all comers. It does not place


a special burden on _ property


owners; it does not violate prop-


erty rights or due process. The


Rumford law is not a "special


privilege"' law for minorities, and


it will not be disruptive in the


community. :


4. The initiative campaign will


subject California to a prolonged,


perhaps irremediable period of


inflamed interracial passions and


tensions. The professional racists


will come to the fore and pros-


per, as they always have done in


such a situation. Those who pre-


cipitate such a situation in Cali


fornia at this particular time ia


our history, must ponder their re.


sponsibility for ihe consequences.


_ AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION NEWS


Published by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California


`Second Class Mail privileges authorized at San Francisco, California


ERNEST BESIG... Editor


503 Market Street, San Francisco 5, California, EXbrook 2-4692


Subscription Rates - Two Dollars a Year


Twenty Cents Per Copy


Ralph B. Atkinson


Dr. Alfred Azevedo


Prof. Arthur K. Bierman


` Leo Borregard


Rev. Richard Byfield


Prof. James R. Caldwell


William K. Coblentz


Richard DeLancie


Rabbi Alvin I. Fine


Mrs. Zora Cheever Gross


Albert Haas, Jr.


Prof. Van D. Kennedy


Rey. Ford Lewis


Rey. F. Danford Lion


Homorary Treasurer:


Joseph S. Thompson


-Honorary Board Member


Sara Bard Field


Ars. Gladys Brown


Mrs. Paul Couture


John J. Eagan


Joseph Eichler


Morse Erskine


Dr. H. H. Fisher


Mrs. Margaret C. Hayes


Prof, Ernest Hilgard


Mrs. Paul Holmer


Mrs. Mary Hutchinson


Richard Johnston


Board of Directors of the American Civil Liberties Union


of Northern California :


CHAIRMAN: Howard A. Friedman


VICE-CHAIRMEN: Dr. Alexander Meiklejohn


: Helen Salz


Rev. Harry B. Scholefield


SECRETARY-TREASURER: John M. Fowle


EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Ernest Besig


Committee of Sponsors


Prof. Seaton W. Manning


John R. May


Prof. Charles Muscatine


Prof. Herbert L. Packe:


Clarence E. Rust


John Brisbin Rutherford


Mrs. Martin Steiner


Gregory S. Stout


Stephen Thiermann


Richard J. Werthimer


Donald Vial


GENERAL COUNSEL


Wayne M. Collins '


Roger Kent


Mis., Ruth Kingman


Prof. Theedere Kreps


Prof. Carlo Lastrucci


Norman Lezin :


Prof. John Henry Merryman


Rev. Robert W. Moon


Dr. Marvin J. Naman


Prof. Hubert Phillips


Prof. Wilson Record


Dr. Norman Reider


Prof. Wallace Stegner


Mrs. Theodosia Stewart


Rt. Rev. Sumner Walters


- dio


"liberty and justice for all'


The Youth Council of the Oakland branch of the NAACP


recently sought a boycott of the pledge of allegiance in six


Oakland high schools. Because of the lack of freedom for the


black man in this country, the Council asserted Negroes


should not make a public declaration about "one nation...


with liberty and justice for all."


Thereafter, the boycott was can-


celled.


Common Misunderstanding


In the meantime, one school


board member asserted that we


don't "have the right to select


those laws we will obey and those


we will ignore." The statement


reflected the general misunder-


standing about the pledge of al-


_Jegiance. The fact is that a board


may not establish a compulsory


flag salute and pledge of alle-


giance. without abridging the Con-


stitution.


Back in 1959 the State Board


of Education adopted the follow-


ing regulation: "There shall be a


daily pledge of allegiance to the


flag of the United States in each


public school, conducted in ac-


cordance with regulations which


shall be adopted by each govern-


ing board." There is nothing in


the regulation about students


being required to give the


pledge.


Problem An Old One


The problem, however, is not


a new one. In the past, it has


generally involved students who


are affiliated with Jehovah's


Witnesses, but, more recently,


children and teachers have ob-


jected to the "under God" clause


which was added a few years ago.


More recently, Negroes have ex-


pressed their objections to the


words "with liberty and justice


for all."


Twenty years ago, in the case


of West Virginia State Beard of


Education v. Barnette, 319 US.


624, the U.S. Supreme Court, in


a Jehovah's Witness case ruled


against the compulsory pledge.


While Jehovah's Witnesses take


the position that the pledge vio-


Jates their religious freedom in


the' they would be required to


bow down before a man-made


ACLU NEWS


DECEMBER, 1963


Page 2


image, the case was not decided


on the religious freedom issue.


Affirming A Belief


What the court did hold was


that no citizen may be compelled


publicly to affirm a belief. "If


there is any fixed star in our


constitutional constellation," said


Mr. Justice Jackson in the pre-


vailing opinion, "it is that no


official, high or petty can pre-


scribe what shall be orthodox in


politics, nationalism, religion, or


other matters of opinion or force


citizens to confess by word or act


their faith therein. ... We think


the action of the local authorities


in compelling the flag salute and


pledge transcends constitutional


limitations on their power and


invades the sphere of intellect


and spirit which it is the purpose


of the First Amendment to our


Constitution to reserve from all


official control."


Pledge Must Be Voluntary


. While, in accordance with the


State Board's regulation, local


boards must provide for a VOL-


UNTARY Pledge of Allegiance,


a COMPULSORY pledge is re-


pugnant to the Constitution and


cannot be enforced. Each indi-


vidual may decide for himself


~mhether he will join in the exer-


cise and no one may be penalized


for failing to do so.


@


Bill


6 5]


Of Rights Day


President John F. Kennedy


has proclaimed Sunday, Decem-


ber 15, 1963, as Bill of Rights


Day and has urged "`all citizens


te observe that day and to foster


maintemance and reinforcement


of the Bill of Rights, the bastion


of the freedom which is the core


of our national strength." It will


mark the 172nd anniversary of


the adoption of the first ten


amendments of the Constitution


ef the United States.


Protest FCC


Questionnaire


To Pacifica


The FCC has demanded that


the Board of Directors and Sta-


tion Managers of Pacifica


Foundation, operators of FM ra-


broadcasting stations in


Berkeley, Los Angeles and New


York, answer questionnaires as


to membership in the Communist


Party and groups advocating the


violent overthrow of the govern-


ment. If the latter question is


answered in the affirmative, the


organization must be listed to-


gether with the dates of member-


ship, and dates of membership


must also be provided if the first'


question is answered in the af-


firmative.


In requesting affidavits, the


FCC explained that questions


have been raised concerning pos-


sible Communist affiliation of


the leadership of Pacifica Foun-


dation, but who these accusers


are has not been indicated. Nev-


ertheless, as an aid in resolving


these questions, the Commission


has requested oaths of non-dis-


loyalty. A 30-day deadline was


fixed but was extended into De-


cember.


Questionnaire Discriminatory


This political disclaimer is dis-


criminatory since no other radio


station has been required to fur-


nish such information to the Com-


mission as a condition of securing


or renewing a broadcasting li-


cense. More important, the re-


quirement is repugnant to First


Amendment guarantees of politi-


cal freedom and, consequently,


has caused the ACLU of North-


ern California to protest to the


Commission.


In the meantime, Pacifica


Foundation is placed in a dilem-


ma. If the board gives in and


signs the affidavits it will lose


most of its employees and many


of its supporters. If it refuses


to sign, it faces extensive and


costly administrative hearings in


order to secure renewal of its


licenses, and, if the licenses are


denied, equally burdensome court


action.


Free Speech Forums


Anyone familiar with the oper-


ations of Pacifica Foundation


knows that its three stations pro-


vide forums where all sides may


be heard. The Foundation is be-


ing harassed because it is follow-


ing a free speech policy instead


of discriminating against unortho-


dox groups in the community.


Members of the ACLU are


urged to join the ACLU board in


protesting against the Commis-


sion's requirement. Such protests


can be sent to the Federal Com-


munications Commission, Wash-


ington, D. C. 20554. In sending


such protests, you will be defend-


ing your freedom to hear.


Customs Service


Releases Seized


American Books


The Customs Service recently


released several cartons of books


addressed to J. Ben Stark of


Berkeley, which had been seized


for possible violation of Section


305 of the Tariff Act, prohibiting


the importation of obscene ma-


terial.


These books, published in the


United States, had been shipped


abroad by Stark but were not de-


livered. When they were re-


turned, they were seized by


agents of the Customs Service in


San Francisco and finally re-


ferred to the Commissioner of


Customs in Washington for an


opinion, The ACLU intervened at


Stark's request when Washington


failed to act.


In releasing the books, George


K. Brokaw, Collector of Customs


in San Francisco, declared as


follows: "Although there appears


to be some question of the ob-


scenity of the books, we are


directed to release them to you


since they are American books


being returned."


Pamphlets and Books


For Sale by ACLU


The following books and pam-


phlets are available at the ACLU


office, 503 Market St., San Fran-


cisco 5, Calif., at the prices indi-


eated. Mail orders accepted if


accompanied by payment:


1. Academic Freedom and Aca-


demic Responsibility - A state-


ment of the principles concern-


ing the civil liberties of teachers


in public and private schools, col-


leges, and universities, published


by the ACLU. 16 pages. Price 10


cents.


2. Academic Freedom ane Civil


Liberties of Students in Colleges


and Universities - Published by


the ACLU in November, 1961. 15


pages. Price 10 cents.


3. Academie Due Process - A


statement of desirable proce-


dures applicable within educa-


tional institutions in cases in-


volving academic freedom. Pub-


lished by the American Civil


Liberties Union. 8 pages. Price


10 cents.


4. Religious Scheols and "Sec-


ular' Subjects An analysis of


the premises of Title II, Section


305 of the National Defense Edu-


eation Act, by George R. La


Nove of Yale University. Re-


printed from Harvard Educa-


tional Review, Summer 1962.


"Are the subjects of science,


mathematics and foreign lan-


guages truly `secular' subjects in


parochial schools as supporters


maintain?" 35 pages. Price 50


cents.


5. Religion and the Public


Schools, by Marvin Braiterman


-Published by the Commission


on Social Action of Reform Ju-


daism. 72 pages. Price, 35 cents.


6. Freedom of the Mind, by


Justice William O. Douglas -


Published by American Library


Association in cooperation with


the Public Affairs Committee,


Ine. Discusses the trend to con-


formity, mass communications,


the Bill of Rights, shackles on


thought, libel laws, freedom of


speech and communism, loyalty


oaths, legislative investigations,


freedom of speech, censorship


and challenging the status quo.


44 pages. Price 60 cents.


7. On Government and Prayer,


by Edmond Cahn. Reprinted


from the New York University


Law Review. 20 pages. Price 15c.


8. Grand Inquest, by Telford


Taylor - Ballantine Books, Inc.


This excellent book was first


published in 1955 and deals gen-


erally with congressional investi-


gations. Price, 75 cents.


9. Some Illustrations of the


Harms Done to Individuals by


the House Committee on Un-


American Activities-A mimeo-


graphed illustrative digest of the


harms suffered by persons called


to testify, named in hearings or


involved in other ways with


HUAC. Published by national


ACLU. Price, 25 cents.


10. The Un-Americans,


by Frank J. Donner-Published


by Ballantine Books, Inc. Pre-


sents in a popular manner the


committee's abuses over the


years. Price 60 cents.


J1. Operation Abolition: Some


Facts and Some Comments - A


comprehensive, objective, well-


written analysis of distortions in


the film, giving clear evidence


`of what actually happened at


S. F's City Hall in May, 1960.


Published by the National Coun-


cil of Churches. Price, 50 cents.


12. Why Should Congress


Abolish the House Un-American


Activities Committee? - Pub-


lished by the American Civil


Liberties Union, January, 1961.


4 pages. Price, 5 cents.


13. Obscenity and Censorship.


Two statements of the American


Civil Liberties Union. Published


March, 1963. Price 10c.


14. How Americans Pretest: A


Statement on the Civil Rights


Demonstrations. Published by


the ACLU. Price 15c.


15. The Bill of Rights and the


States, by Justice William J.


Brennan, Jr.- Published by the


Center for the Study of Demo-


eratie Institutions. 24 pages.


25 cents.


16. The Wiretapping Problem


Yeday-A report of the Ameri-


can Civil Liberties Union, pub-


lished March, 1962. 20 pages.


Price, 15 cents.


17. Foundations of Freedom in (c)


the American Constitution.--Edit- -


ed by Alfred H. Kelley. A guide


to understanding the nature of


our constitutional liberties. Har-


per and Brothers, publishers. Hard


cover. 299 pages. Price, $3.50.


18. The Supreme Court and


Civil Liberties, by Osmond K.


Fraenkel - 2nd edition, 1963,


published for the ACLU by


Oceana Publications. 189 pages.


Price $1.75.


19. A Program for Improving


Bill of Rights Teaching in High


Schools. The Report of the Wil-


liamstown Workshop. Disirib-


uted by: The National Assembly


on Teaching the Principles of the


Bill of Rights. 138 pages. Price


$1.65.


California has another beard


case besides the Gne in San Fran-


cisco. In Pasadena, the Board of


Education has ordered the dis-


missal of Paul Finot, teacher at


the John Muir. school, because of


his refusal to shave his beard. At-


torneys for the ACLU of South-


ern California have filed a friend


of the court brief in the Superior


Court and appropriately enough


one of them, A. L. Wirin, wears


a beard.


Security of the Person


The brief denounces the


pboard's action as "arbitrary, ca-


pricious and unreasonable, and -


hence violative of petitioner's


right to due process of law-' It


argues that what is involved in


the case is the fundamental right


to be left alone, or the security


of the person. "We submit," says


the brief, "that this security of


the person involves the right to


appear as one desires (cf. the


Quakers in the past). We urge


that the right of a man to wear


a beard is an attribute of a person


and of personality itself. We have


always been, and we pride our-


selves as being, a tolerant people.


This should, and does, extend to


the question of so personal a


question as to whether a man


may wear a beard."


Totalitarian Conformity


ACLU attorneys compared the |


conformity imposed by the board


in this case with that in totalitari-


an countries such as pre-war Ger.


many and Japan where students


wore the same uniforms, and in


Communist China today where


the people dress alike. "Indeed,


in a totalitarian society," said the


brief, "what one wears is one's


badge. We need not emulate that


here."


Not Beyond the Pale |


The ACLU brief also charges


that the wearing of a beard "is


not so far afield from popular ac-


ceptance as the action of the


school board would suggest (even


if it were, the board's action


would not be justified). It is true


that the wearing of a beard is


not usual, and is a matter of fash-


ion. This by no means means that


one who does wear a beard in the


tradition, by the way, of Charles


Evans Hughes, Abraham Lincoln,


Jonn Muir (the person after


whom the school at which peti-


tioner taught was named), to


mention but a few, is so far be-


yond the pale as to be disciplined


therefor."


I wish to speak first of some


familiar items in the American


national agenda which, when pur-


sued at sufficient length, will


bring us straight back to the con-


_ dition of man and the condition


of his freedom.


American education at present


is in a crisis deeper than it knows,


a erisis many of whose elements


are hidden by an intellectual and


moral lethargy within the culture.


These elements are obscured by


a driving national ambition for


the development of technological,


military, and economic power.


They are further obscured by an


Administration skilled in the arts


of public relations, devoted to


political engineering, ready to


compromise the clarity and moral


excitement of democratic prin-


ciple for the limited gains of op-


portune suecess. Other elements


of the crisis are overt and have


exposed themselves


form just recently.


Evidence of Neglect


For example, the education of


the Negro people has now re-


vealed itself as a national scandal,


and the evidence of years of


neglect is now exploding into


public consciousness. It is clear


that at least one-third of the en-


tire population of the United


States, black and white, is re-


ceiving a third-rate education,


suited to a poor and backward


society. We have now thousands


of: young men and women roam-


ing the slum streets of our big


cities uneducated, unemployed,


and unemployable. The favored


youth of the suburbs drift on a


tide of affluence to the twin port


. of status and security. The gen-


eral level of teaching in our col-


leges and universities is such that


the best students are bored with


it and the rest suffer from intel-


lectual malnutrition. Why should


this be the case?


National Attention Diverted


The answer goes deep into


questions having to do with the


state of America in the world.


This could be summed up by our


saying that national attention has


been diverted into matters which


have really nothing to do with


the development of our culture.


There is a lack of social criticism,


a lack of sustained, lusty, and


progressive reforms toe the body


of American society, a growth of


reactive mechanisms on the part


of politicians to the problems of


the society. -


Arithmetic of Problem


Certain sums of arithmetic may


reveal the present situation.


We had recently the announce-


ment that 5.1 billion dollars is to


_be spent on space research to get


a man to the moon and back, and


that it costs 64 million dollars for


a single space flight. We had re-


eently the news that in spite of


the fact that we have a test-ban


treaty, signed and ratified, we


have on hand 55 million dollars to


keep the Christmas Island and


Johnson Island testing sites in


shape, with 500 million dollars


in reserve in case we want to do


more testing. Yet, when we look


at the budget for education for


the arts, we find that we who are


citizens of the United States are


going to be privileged to raise


30 million dollars for our own


culture center in Washington,


that is if anybody wants it, and


that around two million dollars is


all we can afford for our entire


eultural program abroad. A seri-


ous imbalance is shown by this


arithmetic, especially when. we


learn that the major question otf


the billions we need for the im-


provement of the public school


system has not even been con-


sidered in the Congress and is not


likely to be, in the press of other


matters.


in radical -


By HAROLD TAYLOR


Excerpts from Address to American Civil Liberties Union Annual Meeting,


Sheraton Palace Hotel, San Francisco, October 27, 1963


Deeper Crisis


The contemporary crisis in ed-


ueation reflects a deeper crisis


and arises from the fact that we


have let the events of modern


life outrun our ability and our


concern to keep up with them.


We have had to wait until the


roof falls in before we notice the


rafters have been shaking. We


have had to wait until race riots


rock the South before we realize


the situation of the Negro is in-


tolerable. We have had to wait


until the brink of war before we


realized that the world will have


no safety until it is disarmed.


We have had to wait until the


Russians put a man into space


before we began to worry about


our educational system. We


simply accept the pollution of


the atmosphere by fallout as if


it were a patriotic gesture. We


pollute our streams, we ruin our


landscapes, we overcrowd our


cities, we develop cur slums, we


ereate huge cenires of ugliness


all in the name of technological


and economic progress. The fact


is that somehow we have man-


aged to get ourselves on the side


of people who kill Buddhists and


put college students in jail, and


that we now must justify signing


a test-ban treaty, not on the


grounds that it will save man-


kind and that it will help the


Russian people as well as the


American people, and everyone


else now alive on this globe, but


on the grounds that it will keep


us ahead of the Russians in nu-


clear weapons because we are a


-whiz at testing underground...


Places For New Ideas


It is, therefore, natural that


`the colleges and schools should


be places where new ideas for


the improvement of democracy


should grow, and that students, in


their search for political matur-


ity and democratic ideals should


engage themselves in efforts to


gain equality for the Negro, to


achieve a peaceful world order,


to protect civil liberties, to ad-


vance intellectual freedom, and


to gain a higher level of op-


portunity for the under-priv-


ileged. We must remember that


it was the integrity, dignity,


courage, and initiative of the


young Negroes in schools and


colleges of the South which, in


the sit-in strikes and freedom


rides, held before the country's


eyes an image of what must be


done to assure the freedom and


opportunity of all men and wom-


en in the United States. Our


schools and colleges are and must


be the breeding-ground for citi-


zens who understand the neces-


sity of intellectual and political


freedom, citizens who will fight


for their rights according to the


democratic principles which are


set down in our constitution.


Opposition To Political Tyranny


If it is natural for our students


to seek to advance human wel-


fare and democratic values, it is


also natural that those who wish


to destroy intellectual freedom,


who despise democratic values,


and who hold no respect for


democratic process should strike


at the colleges and schools in an


effort to undermine the demo-


eratic idea. Once the educators


and their students can be forced


into silence and inaction, the ma-


jor source of opposition to politi-


eal tyranny has been removed,


and the politics of unreason and


brute force can prevail. When


students can be arrested for


peaceful demonstrations on be-


half of their rights as citizens,


we can find no other language


to describe the society in which


they live than to say it is a police


state. There is a direct relation


between the attacks on Buddhists


in their pagodas by the South


Viet Nam Government and the


bombing of Negroes in their


churches by southern citizens, a


direct relation between jailing


political opponents in Africa and


Asia and jailing Negroes who


wish to vote and to be given their


full citizenship in the American


South. In each case, what is at


stake is the freedom of the indi-


vidual and his right:to think, to


act, and to live in a democratic


society.


Conservatives Defined


It is a mistake to refer to such


organizations as the Christian


Crusade and the John Birch so-


ciety as conservative movements.


A conservative is a man who re-


sists change on the grounds that


what replaces the status quo may


be worse than what presently


exists. He is a man who wishes


to conserve what he has, and who


opposes new trends which might


upset what he holds dear.


Anti-Demecrats


But the group of organizations


which are identified with the


American Right, now some 2,000


in number, dismiss the idea of


the brotherhood of man as "hog-


wash" and refer to anyone who


with them as Com-


unists and Communist sympa-


thizers, among whom they in-


clude Chief Justice Warren,


President Eisenhower, President


Truman, Dean Rusk, and Presi-


dent Kennedy. These are not or-


ganizations of conservatives.


These are totalitarians and anti-


democrats, out to destroy Ameri-


can freedom and replace it by


military and political repression.


Their concerns are not for the


preservation of democratic val-


ues. They are defined by their


hatreds, their fears, their anti-


intellectualism, their anti-democ-


racy. As Lionel Trilling once


pointed out, the actions of groups


such as these do not "express


themselves in ideas but only in


action or in irritable mental ges-


tures which seek to resemble


ideas."


Freedom Of Students


It is, therefore, our responsi-


bility as educators to do every-


thing in our power to protect the


freedom of our students, to resist


the encroachments of the totali-


tarians who would remove books


from our library shelves, dictate


the terms in which education is


to be carried on, and threaten


the very heart of the educational


enterprise by secret campaigns


to dismiss teachers whose views


are democratic ...


Principles of Demecracy


One of these days I would en-


joy reading a book on education


which simply started with the


idea that the way to save and


to strengthen the country is to


have everyone from kindergarten


_to the end of college, study the


creative arts and the principles


of democracy on the grounds that


theatre, dance, music, painting,


sculpture, poetry, philosophy and


democratic freedoms are more


important than anything else in


learning to understand life and


society. Therefore, these are the


things which should be central


to the curriculum. We would al-


low a little bit of science, math-


ematics, engineering, law, and


other things, and these could be


added as electives if there were


any time, since they are frills. If


you really want to make the


country strong and really want to


compete with the Russians, edu-


eate a new generation of poets


and artists, some of whom can


also handle the sciences. That


would scare the Russians to death


and take their minds off the


nuclear threat..


Poets, Writers and Critics


In faet, when we look at the


structure of a given society, to


take two societies at random


which are presently in the news,


ward Albee,


the United States and the Soviet


Union, we find that the most


powerful elements in these so-


cieties for shaping their future


are not the technologists, the


engineers, and the scientists, but


the poets, writers, and the critics.


In the Soviet Union; the inner


force toward freedom, which is


now loosening up the conception


of what a true Soviet Society


should be, is not to be found


among the scientists and tech-


nologists. They are going along


doing pretty much.what they are


told to do. The force is to be


found among the painters, poets,


and writers who now speak to


the people about individual truth,


who speak of human conscious-


ness and the need for it to ex-


pand, the need to breathe pure


air. Pasternak is the one to worry


about, or even Yevtushenko. Not


Gagarin, or Titov, or the other


astronauts.


A Forgotten Astronaut


Does anyone recall the name of


Valentino Tereshkova? Valentino


who? She is the lady astronaut


who flew to a happy rendezvous


in space with her soviet comrade,


thereby striking simultaneously


a blow for womanhood and


weightlessness. I have heard it


suggested among my friends and


colleagues that this country


should not take such an affront


to American women lying down,


but that we should immediately


put Elizabeth Taylor into orbit.


If it is true that the moral


force, the social dynamism and


the clearest images of life are fo


be found among the artists and


writers, we need to look at our


own society, where the arts are


not controlled by direct action of


political parties, to see where the


souree of the change can hb


found. :


Source of Change


Who creates the image of our-


selves which we then pursue?


What scientists? What technolo-


gists? The answer is, no scien-


tists, no technologists. The one


whe pointed out what we are


doing in polluting the environ-


ment by insecticides was Rachel


Carson. The one who showed us


what we are doing to ourselves


in the treatment of the Negro


was James Baldwin. The ones


who have shown us what our


lives have become are Arthur


Miller, Tennessee Williams, Ed-


David Riesman,


Erich Fromm, Ben Shahn, Jack-


son Pollock, Paul Tillich. These


are the men whose opinions can-


not be manipulated. They develop


the ideas which work within the


society at a level below con-


sciousness as well as above it.


Would it not be wise that we,


in this protean, vital, powerful,


extraordinary society should


once more pay attention to those


aspects of our lives which have


to do with the decision as to


what we shall become? Is it not


time we turn to the concern for


ideas, ideals, possibilities, imagin-


ings, truths, and destinies which


lie within the humane pursuits


of art and the imagination?


Inspiration of the Arts


For it is from the human imag-


ination that all the fruits of


life may grow, and our society


will continue to be half-educated,


half-trained, and half-hearted if


we do nothing in our educational


system to bring to our children


the inspiration of the arts.


An example comes to mind in


a recent incident in Rutherford,


New Jersey, where a company of


actors was denied the use of the


local auditorium to produce


Gide's The Immoralist. The Ruth-


erford Board of Education ruled


against the acting company after


hearing a Roman Catholic priest


tell it that "reereation should be


wholesome and uplifting, not de-


Dr. Joel Fort, El Cerrito psy-


chiatrist, who wes fired from his


civil service position as Director


of the Center for Treatment and


Education on Alcoholism for Ala-


meda County because he engaged


in volunteer political activity in


his home county, received the


formal support of the ACLU last


month with the filing of a brief


amicus curiae in the District


Court of Appeal. Fort won his


case in the Superior Court and


thus retains his employment but


Alameda County has taken an


appeal.


The brief was prepared with


the assistance of volunteer attor-


ney Arthur Brunwasser and asks


that the court declare the section


of the county charter forbidding


political activity of any sort by


civil service employees unconsti-


tutional as obnoxious to the guar-


antees of the First Amendment.


The brief shows that the Ala-


meda County prohibitions (which


go so far as to forbid any public


expression of political opinion)


are more severe than even the


Federal Hatch Act provisions


held valid in the controversial


decision of United Public Work-


ers v. Mitchell (1947).


The brief also asks that the


clear and present danger test be


applied since First Amendment


freedoms of speech and. associa-


tion are being resricted. The con-


clusion of the brief is that the


political sterilization of civil


servants in an era of vastly in-


ereased government employment


not only deprives them of influ-


ence in the democratic process


but deprives the public of the


right to hear views of persons


who have a great deal of inform-


ation about issues of political


concern. -M. W. K.


pressing and unsavory." It voted


-after hearing one of its mem-


bers say, "If the play's contro-


versial, 'm against it," and after


refusing to see the play in order


to make a determination about


its quality. Fortunately a Uni-


tarian minister volunteered the


facilities of his church in order


that the community might see


the play and experience such in-


sight as Gide could provide to


the citizens. Unless we have in


our schools and colleges those


lovers and critics of the creative


arts who can make sure that such


community decisions cannot be


made, we are not going to have


a viable culture.


Issues We Must Face


Where then are the serious


issues we must face if we are to


keep this country free and give


it the kind of moral and social


energy which can convert its re-


sources of freedom into creative


growth?


I suggest that we look at the


facts, and that we consider the


relation of those facts to the


needs our educational system


must fulfill. There is no doubt


that our need for scientists, engi-


neers, and technological experts


is very great. No major power


ean sustain either its economy or


its place in world affairs without


a strong and growing technologi-


eal force to man its industrial


establishment.


But we must do something


more than urging ourselves into


high school and college curricula


which emphasize the sciences


and technologies. Our latest


figures indicate that there are at


least a million youth between the


ages of 16 and 20 who are out of


school, out of work, and poten-


tially unemployable. Why?


Beeause they have not been


taught te do anything which


makes them employable, and be-


cause their society has found no


room for them except on the


streets.


ACLU NEWS


DECEMBER, 1963


Page 3


Twenty-ninth Anniversary Meeting


Harol


00 Members Hear Dr.


d Taylor Speak


"There is a direct relation between the attacks on


Buddhists in their pagodas by the South Viet Nam Govern-


~ment and the bombing of Negroes in their churches by


southern citizens, a direct relation between jailing political


opponents in Africa and Asia and jailing Negroes who wish


_to vote and to be given their full


citizenship in the American


South. In each case, what is at


stake is the freedom of the indi-


. vidual and his right to think, to


act, and to live in a democratic


society."


This was Harold Taylor speak-


ing on "Social Change and Po-


litical Crisis" at the ACLU's an-


nual meeting, October 27 at the


Sheraton-Palace Hotel. In this


observation you get only a


glimpse of the big, colorful can-


vas he drew to get at "the con-


dition of man and the condition


of his freedom."


Picture of Crisis


It was a picture of erisis-in


education, the national budgeting


of monies and human resources,


"the state of America in the


world'-all undermining


civil liberties and democratic


well-being. Not a pretty picture,


Dr. Taylor made it lively with


sharp strokes of his creative out-


look, his fresh view of the prob-


lems that are bugging the coun-


try and his refreshing ideas on


what we can do about it.


"It is clear,' he began, "that


at least one-third of the entire


population of the United States,


black and white, is receiving a


third-rate education, suited to a


poor and backward society." This


condition, with its "intellectual


malnutrition," Dr. Taylor traced


to the concentration of our na-


tional attention on "matters


which have really nothing to do


with the development of: our cul-


ture" and to "a lack of social


criticism, a lack of sustained,


`lusty, and progressive reforms to


`the body of American society .,


What Must Be Done


He reminded the responsive


audience of about 600 that it was


"the integrity, dignity, courage,


Meeting Favors


ACLU Chapter


For Berkeley


-About 150 Berkeley, Albany


and Kensington members met at


the Washington School audito-


rium in Berkeley on November


14 to discuss whether or not a


Berkeley Chapter of the


ACLUNC should be established.


There was lively discussion and


some sharp disagreement. At the


end, however, there was an over-


whelming vote for establishing a


chapter.


Consequently, a temporary


board of 19 persons was elected


to continue with organizational


plans. In the meantime, a ques-


tionnaire will be sent to the 1100


-members residing in the area to


determine whether at least 15


`per cent of the membership is


prepared actively to support a


chapter.


_ The temporary board will


tailor the Modele By-Laws to suit


local needs and submit them for


consideration by the member-


ship. It will also take preliminary


steps to secure the election of


a permanent board in accordance


with such By-Laws. If all of


these things work out satis-


factorily, the branch board will


have to decide whether the pe-


_titioning group "has given satis-


factory evidence of vitality, lead-


ership and devotion to the ob-


jectives and program of the


Union."


Prof. Charles Muscatine did an


outstanding job as chairman of


the meeting. Ernest Besig was


on hand to answer questions.


ACLU NEWS


DECEMBER, 1963


Page 4


our"


and initiative of the young Ne-


groes in schools and colleges of


the South which, in the sit-in


strikes and freedom rides, held


before the country's eyes an.im-


age of what must be done to as-


sure the freedom and opportu-


nity of all men and women in the


United States.' This he saw as


the "natural" outcome of schools


and colleges being `"`the breeding-


ground for citizens who under-


stand the necessity of intellec-


tual and political freedom, citi-


zens who will fight for their


rights according to the demo-


cratic principles which are set


down in our constitution."


Dr. Taylor's Proposals


Dr. Taylor's proposals to save


and strengthen the country were


to have everyone "from kinder-


garten to the end of college,


study the creative arts and the


principles of democracy on the


grounds that theatre, dance, mu-


sic, painting,


philosophy and democratic free-


doms are more important than


anything else in learning to un-


derstand life and society." Doc-


umenting with poetry and pun-


gent examples, he called for the


development of a generation of


artists, writers and critics "to


keep this country free and give it


the kind of moral and social en-


ergy which can convert its re-


sources of freedom into creative


growth."


Alarm Sounded By Besig


For the meeting executive


director Ernest Besig reviewed


the ACLU's work in northern


California over the past year. He


cited the Louis Hartman case, in


which the Government dropped


its contempt-of-Congress charges


this fall after five years of liti-


gation, for bearing "witness to


our continuing, strenuous oppo-


sition to violations of political


freedom by the House Committee


on Un-American Activities." He


reported several security cases on


the docket, noting the harm done


to individuals involved because


"the Government has failed to


give relief within a reasonable


time." He detailed a number of


victories for freedom of the press


against the attack of censors.


-And he alerted the audience to


an initiative move by real estate


`groups in the State that would


nullify the Rumford Fair Hous-


ing Act, the Hawkins Act and


the Unruh Act. to "turn the


clock back" and "to perpetuate


racial segregation."


Tribute To Dr. Meiklejohn


Chairing the annual meeting,


Howard A. Friedman, chairman


of the Board of Directors, paid


tribute to Dr. Alexander Meikle-


jonn, Board member and a found-


er of the ACLUNC, who was in


the audience; Helen Salz, another


founder and board member, and


Sara Bard Field Wood, honor-


ary board member, -J. H.


Officers and


Board of Diablo


Chapter Named


Last month, The Rev. Lester


Kinsolving, Episcopal minister in


Pittsburg and Clayton Valley,


was elected chairman of the new-


ly formed Mt. Diablo Chapter of


the American Civil Liberties Un-


ion of Northern California. Other


officers are Dr. Robert Suczek


and Charles R. Weidner, vice-


chairmen; George Nichols, secre-


tary, and Albert Bertani, treas-


urer.


The Board of Directors in-


sculpture, poetry,


Letters to the


Editor


"Sectarian Influence"


Editor: With respect to Black


Muslim speakers at the Univer-


sity of California, the November


ACLU News states: "Under the


University's charter, sectarian ac-


tivities are forbidden on the


campus."


That statement is too broad, I


believe. The California Constitu-


tion does provide that "The uni-


versity shall be entirely inde-


pendent of all political or sectari-


an influence and kept free there-


from in the appointment of its


regents and in the administration


of its affairs ..." (Emphasis


added.)


There are various kinds of po-


litical and sectarian activities


which, within the meaning of that


clause, do not "influence" either


the appointment of regents or the


administration of the affairs of


the University.


Frank G. Newman, Dean,


School of Law, University


of California, Berkeley.


ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log eg ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log


Annual Prizes


Editor: In my last letter pub-


lished in the October issue of the


ACLU-News I pointed out what


areas I felt the ACLU might shy


away from. May I be permitted to


express my views as to the pos-


sible positive areas our organiza-


tion could endeavor to enter in


the years to come.


With reactionary, anti -demo-


cratic forces gathering strength


all around us, the role of the


ACLU becomes more important


each day.


We need not limit ourselves


bringing the issues to the aware-


ness of our own membership only


but should make a serious effort


to get our message to the general


public. It is one thing for the


ACLU to play the role of a legal-


aid society for victims and targets


of anti-democratic forces but it is


equally important to bring the


issues clearly before the general


public.


The best way to break into the


mass medias - press, radio and


TV, is by breaking into the news


with positive, prestige-lending ac-


tivities.


Our Board of Directors could


award three annual prizes to out-


standing people who have stood


up effectively against those who


want to destroy traditional civil


liberties. Personalities help dram-


atizing constitutional issues which


are often too remote and compli-


cated to be understood by people -


who easily forget what they have


or should have learned in their


civics studies.


Such awards need not be mone-


tary but could be merely a plaque


or a certificate-scroll. But the


ceremonial, not unlike the annual


filmland "Oscar" awards could


take place in an elegant, respec-


table atmosphere, perhaps at a


donor's dinner. An eloquent


speaker could sum up the current


situation and a prominent lawyer


or educator could make the


awards-our much admired direc-


tor Dr. Ernest Besig is probably


more qualified than anyone to


perform these duties.


Youth could be given similar


prizes, perhaps scholarships for


outstanding essays on the subject


of civil liberties.


People respond favorably to


such positive and prestige-build-


ing events. Our recent newspaper


breaks have often been rather


negative or defensive which puts


the ACLU in an unfavorable posi-


tion.


Let's make a concerted effort


to break into the news with the


dignity and respect our highly


worthwhile organization so well


deserves. Walter Gerstel


cludes the officers as well as the


following persons: Robert Birn-


baum, Clair Calhoon, Jerome Don-


chin, Neil Falconer, Orville Hill,


the Rev. Aaron Gilmartin, Jean


Jonas, Murray McNeil, Jr., Dr.


Harvey Powelson, Mary E. Reuss-


wig, Don M. Sanford, Joan Strom-


berg, Harry Stylos, James R. Utz


and Richard-Worthen,


Score Wiretapping for


intelligence Purposes


The American Civil Liberties Union last month scored


governmental use of wiretapping and mail censorship for


intelligence and security purposes. The civil liberties organi-


zation condemned such practices as a "blatant invasion of


personal privacy which no agency of a democratic govern-


ment should employ."


The ACLU. statement noted


the admission by State Depart-


ment officials to the Senate In-


ternal Security Subcommittee


that they had bugged the tele-


phone of Otto F. Opteka, the De-


partment's chief security evalua-


tions officer, and the recent con-


troversy in West Germany over


the United States Army's tapping


of phones and screening of pri-


vate mail between West Ger-


many and Cuba.


Admissions Made


Opteka is appealing within the


State Department his dismissal


on charges of having given con-


fidential documents to the Senate


Subcommittee and of having en-


couraged it pehind-the-scenes `to


ask embarrassing questions of his


superiors. John F. Reilly, Deputy


`Assistant Secretary for Security,


his special assistant, David I.


Belisle, and Elmer D. Hill, Chief


of the Division of Technical


Services, denied last summer in


testimony before the Subcommit-


tee that they had tapped Op-


teka's telephone in their search


for evidence against him. Reilly


and Hill on. November 6, in let-


ters to the Subcommittee, re-


vised their earlier denial of elec-


tronic eavesdropping to admit


that a device had been placed on


Opteka's telephone to record all


conversations in his office. The


officials said that because.. of


electrical interference they dis-


covered in a test of the system


that only telephone conversa-


tions could be heard. Because of


this and the obtaining of in-


criminating evidence against Op-


teka in his trash basket, the re-


cording device was removed.


illegal Search


"Regardless of the Depart-


ment's assurance that the system


was never actually used, we are


shocked that an eavesdropping


device was ever contemplated


and tested," the ACLU said, add-


ing: "the Fourth Amendment's


prohibition against illegal search


and seizures clearly bars govern-


mental invasion of personal com-


munications of citizens, even in a


governmental inquiry of one of


its employees.


Dragnet Method


"The evil of electronic eaves-


dropping is its dragnet nature,


that it records for the tapper's


ears not selected statements but


every conversation of the indi-


vidual under surveillance, even


the most intimate and revealing.


No matter how strict rules are


against the use of government


phones for private matters, the


realities of modern life are that


wives and children cannot help


but communicate with husbands


and fathers about family affairs


during the working day through


the telephone. Although govern-


mental officials have denied


listening in on Mr. Opteka's con-


versations, the fact is that the


device was in operating condition


for 48 hours and the government


may have been privy to such con-


versations.


Personal Privacy


"It has no business invading


personal privacy in this manner.


The fact that other measures


were found to carry out the De-


partment's inquiry makes clear


that other methods are available


for intelligence purposes, and


there is no reason for govern-


mental use of unconstitutional


procedures,


"But our concern goes past the


Opteka case, for we note both in


the testimony of Mr. Reilly and


Mr. Belisle statements that secret


`methods of recording conversa-


tions are used by government


agencies. We strongly urge the


Department to review this be-


havior and to eliminate any ves-


tige of electronic invasion of in-


dividual thought and expression."


Wiretapping In Germany


The ACLU's statement also


criticizes -the government's in-


volvement; along with England


and France, in wiretapping and


mail censorship in West Ger-


many. A split developed recently


in the West German government


over its Internal Security Agen-


cy's use. of Allied intelligence


services to engage in such prac-


tices. Wiretapping and tamper-


ing with mail are forbidden by


the West German Constitution,


but under the terms of the


treaties granting West Germany


her sovereignty, the U. S., Britain


and France retain the right to do


so for intelligence purposes.


Twenty-three cases of wiretap-


ping purportedly have taken


place this year already. The news


magazine, Der Spiegel, published


in Bonn, reported that the U. S.


Army is screening personal mail


between West Germany and Cu-


ba. It said the total volume of


West German mail to Cuba an-


nually is 160,000 letters and post-


cards.


Grant Cledrance


In Security Case


Continued from Page [-


cluded last April 19 and there


has not yet been any tentative


decision. The delay is still worse


in a third case in which the in-


dividual's security clearance was


lifted on October 12, 1962. He


has not yet received a Statement


of Reasons and last July his


company finally fired him be-


cause he was of no use to them.


Even if he got a Statement of


Reasons tomorrow it would be


another year before the matter


could be finally disposed of.


The first right of a citizen


Is the right


To be responsible.


JOIN TODAY.


cS 182


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION


OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA


' Patron Membership SOR eo can on 0)


Sustaining Membership .........ccccccccsccveves


Business and Professional Membership ......ecccosee


50


25


Family Membership Re re ee 12


Associate Membership ... 6. -ceces ss cetctecccc ccs 10


Annual Membership . 2. . 6... oo cs dices ence ccecsce 5


Junior Membership (under 21) .....ccceccccccccens


ACLU News See Ss


NAME


S9HOSCHOSSSSHRHTSEHHSSCHSSCHBRHSSCSHRSEBPHSKCSHSHHFTSHHHREHTHRECHSFSCHRKCHEEHSEHHASBE


ADDRESS *eCO9SSSPSHSSFEHSSHFEHHFH9HVMHSSHSEHEHFSFESFSFESFHOHSSHHEHSEERBH HO HHHOBEKEHOS


TELEPHONE NUMBER: 22... ccs cece.


AMT. ENCLOSED... scccccs


503 Market Street


San Francieco, 5


Page: of 4