vol. 55, no. 6 (November)

Primary tabs

aclu news


NON-PROFIT


ORGANIZATION


U.S. POSTAGE


PAID


" PERMIT NO. 4424


SAN FRANCISCO, CA


Volume LV


n Sunday, December 15 - the


QO 200th birthday of the Bill of


Rights - the ACLU-NC will


honor two people who have made those


rights come alive for millions of


Americans, United States Supreme Court


Justices William Brennan and Thurgood


~ Marshall. The Justices will be granted the


Earl Warren Civil Liberties Award at the


ACLU-NC's 19th annual Bill of Rights


Day Celebration.


The Celebration will feature a "Tribute


to Freedom of Expression" _ starring


renowned artists from various fields


including poets Lawrence Ferlinghetti and


June Jordan, jazz musician Jon Jang, mod-


em dancer June Watanabe, comedienne


Marga Gomez, and the Oakland Interfaith


Gospel Choir. The keynote speaker will be


the eloquent criminal defense attorney


Tony Serra.


As Justices Brennan and Marshall will


not be able to attend the Celebration, the


entire program will be videotaped and


delivered to them with their awards.


The event, which also represents the


culmination of the ACLU-NC


Foundation's annual fundraising cam-


paigns, will be held at the St. Francis Hotel


on Union Square at 5:00 PM. (For ticket


information, see below.)


Earl Warren Award


Each year for the past eighteen years,


the Earl Warren Civil Liberties Award has


been presented to a person or persons who


have distinguished themselves as champi-


ons in the battle to preserve and expand


civil liberties.


"Justices Marshall and Brennan are sin-


gularly appropriate recipients of the


Award, for they shared not only the spirit,


but the Supreme Court bench, with Chief


Justice Earl Warren, for whom the award


is named," said ACLU-NC Chair Milton


November 1991


Tribute to Freedom of Expression


Justices Brennan and Marshall to be Honored


Justice William Brennan (I.) and Justice Thurgood Marshall


National Geographic Society


Estes.


Justices Marshall and William


Brennan sat on the United States Supreme


Court for a combined fifty-six years.


"During that time they consistently voted


to defend civil liberties, creating a body of


law that made the Supreme Court a refuge


for all Americans seeking to exercise their


rights. In honor of their tireless efforts to


enforce the letter and spirit of the Bill of


Rights, the ACLU-NC is proud to grant


these two courageous justices the Earl


Warren Civil Liberties Award in this


Bicentennial Year of the Bill of Rights,"


Estes added.


Brennan joined the Court in 1956 in


the turbulent years just following the


Brown v. Board of Education school


desegregation case. At that time, the U.S.


Constitution was not being interpreted to


protect individual privacy in issues such


Minors' Rights to


Abortion on Trial


na courtroom crowded with reporters


I and spectators, the most significant


reproductive rights trial in California


opened on October 1 before San Francisco


Superior Court Judge Maxine Chesney in


the case challenging the 1987 law requir-


ing adolescents to obtain parental consent


or a court order to obtain abortion services.


The law restricting teenagers' access to


abortion has never gone into effect


because of the lawsuit, American Academy


of Pediatrics v. Lungren, filed by ACLU-


NC staff attorney Margaret Crosby,


Abigail English of the National Center for


Youth Law, and cooperating attorneys


Linda Shostak, Lori Schechter, Annette


Carnegie and Monique van Yzerlooy of


Morrison and Foerster.


Plaintiffs in the lawsuit are organiza-


tions and doctors concerned with adoles-


cent health: the American Academy of


Pediatrics (District IX); the California


Medical Association; the American


College of Obstetricians and


Gynecologists (District IX); Planned


Parenthood of Alameda/San Francisco;


and Philip Darney, M.D., Director of


Family Planning, San Francisco General


Hospital.


The case challenges the restrictive law


as violating the explicit right to privacy


(Article I, Sectiont1) in the California


Constitution. The suit argues that the law


infringes teenagers' right to reproductive


choice, requires the unnecessary disclo-


sure of intimate facts, and violates the


government's obligation of neutrality


between childbirth and abortion by bur-


dening only the disfavored reproductive


option of abortion.


Major risk


Shostak, who is the lead trial attorney,


told the court in her opening statement, "It


is a good thing in most cases for a teen-


ager to talk to her parents. But to compel


family harmony is not a good thing. It puts


some teens at a major risk...because not


every family is a happy family."


Shostak asked for a permanent injunc-


tion blocking enforcement of the law,


reminding the court that the Court of


Appeal had placed the burden of proof on


the state to justify the statute's infringe-


ment of fundamental privacy rights.


In October 1989, the state Court of


Appeal upheld a lower court ruling block-


ing the law until its constitutionality could


be determined. The appellate court reaf-


firmed the California Constitution's strong


protection for the right to choose abortion,


Continued on page 4


| as abortion or contraception. The First


Amendment had been weakened first by


the war years and still further by the era of


McCarthyism. The rights of the accused


were poorly formulated, and constitutional


restraints were rarely applied to the con-


duct of the government at the state and


local levels. Justice Brennan did not con-


fine himself to narrow opinions, but formu-


A Celebration


of the Bicentennial


of the Bill of Rights


Venu]


Justices Thurgood Marshall


e William Brennan


with the Earl Warren


Civil Liberties Award


(in absentia)


American Civil Liberties Union


of Northern California


1991 Bill of Rights Day


Sunday, December 15, 199] at 5pm


Refreshments e? No-Hovt Bar at 4pm


Weutin St. Francis Hotel


No. 6


lated broad tests that closely scrutinized


any restrictions on constitutional rights.


Justice Marshall joined in 1967,


appointed by President Lyndon Johnson


three years before Chief Justice Warren


retired. As the first African American to


serve on the nation's highest court, he com-


bined a valuable perspective with an out-


standing record of legal experience to


advance the civil rights of all Americans.


"Tt is a credit to the current day defend-


ers of civil liberties to have these two legal


giants as leaders of the struggle. Together,


they fulfilled the purpose of the


Constitution which is, in Brennan's words


of 1987, `the protection of the dignity of


the human being and the recognition that


every individual has fundamental rights


which government cannot deny him,"


Estes added.


Artists' Tribute


"We are especially pleased that so


many exciting artists have accepted our


invitation to pay tribute to the Justices and


to freedom of expression," said ACLU-NC


Executive Director Dorothy Ehrlich.


"These northern California artists have


helped created the rich and diverse fabric


that reflect the artistic and social values of


our community."


Poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti, whose


Continued on page 3


T 3


BILL. OFF


RIGHTS


1. 2 9 1


G9 9 1


Union Square


Featuring


A Tribute to


Freedom of Expression with


Lawrence Ferlinghetti


poet


Marga Gomez


(waif (


See 0)


compodel, Ata td Ts


Palitas ra


poet, essayist, political activist


Oakland eet, Gospel Choir


TROTTER


Criminal Defense Attorney


June Watanabe


modern dancer


aclu news


nov 1991


Federal Judge Rules Anti-Begging Law is Unconstitutional


Amendment, U.S. District Court


Judge William Orrick ruled on


September 25 that begging is protected


speech in the ACLU-NC case of Blair v.


Shanahan.


The decision held that the state law


which was used by San Francisco police


officers to arrest a homeless man who was


asking for help on the streets was uncon-


Stitutional. The law, California Penal


Code Section 647(c), violates the First


Amendment by prohibiting protected


speech in a public forum. The law also


violates the right to equal protection, the


court ruled, because it does not bar all who


approach others - for example, to ask the


time or directions - only those who


I nN a major victory for the First


approach to ask for help.


- "Begging can promote the very speech


values that entitle charitable appeals to


constitutional protection," Orrick wrote in


a 31-page opinion. "A request for alms


clearly conveys information regarding the


speaker's plight. Begging gives the


speaker the opportunity to spread his


views and ideas on, among other things,


the way our society treats its poor or dis-


enfranchised. And in some cases, a beg-


gar's request can change the way a listener


sees his or her relationship with and obli-


gations to the poor."


The landmark ruling was hailed by


ACLU-NC cooperating attorneys Michael


Hallerud and Robert Keyes of Pettit and


Martin and staff attorney Margaret


Crosby, who represented Celestus Blair in


the lawsuit. Blair, a formerly homeless


man, was arrested five times in 1988 and


1989 for asking people for money in San


Francisco's downtown streets. On each


occasion, the District Attorney declined to


press charges. Blair is no longer homeless


and currently works as a Muni bus driver.


"The ruling is a great victory for Mr.


Blair and for everyone who cherishes lib-


erty and cares for the needy," said Keyes.


Judge Orrick rejected the city's claim


that the law is necessary to protect the


public from intrusive conduct that is


threatening and coercive. "City streets are


a public forum, one of the few remaining


democratic spaces where the convention-


eer, the gawking tourist, the eager consu-


mer, the city resident and the needy may


mingle freely," he wrote. "The speech of


the needy around us may well be subjec-


tively felt as an unwelcome intrusion by


some, but the expressive freedom guaran-


teed by the Constitution has never been


costless."


Attorney Crosby noted that the ruling


was "a strong and principled decision that


protects the constitutional rights of the


most vulnerable people in California."


"Judge Orrick recognized that when


the homeless seek alms, they convey a


message that extreme poverty exists in the


midst of affluence; that society finds it a


disturbing message is not a justification


for silencing the poor," Crosby added.


Union City Police Stop Storing HIV Data


In response to protests from the


ACLU-NC, AIDS activists and


: public' health specialists, the


Union City Police Department has stopped


storing and disseminating information


about HIV infected persons in their com-


munity.


Police Chief Al Guzman announced


the decision after an August meeting with


ACLU-NC staff attommey Matthew Coles,


Jill Jacobs of the AIDS Project of the East


Bay, Susan Black, Director of public pol-


icy on HIV and AIDS for the Alameda


County Public Health Department and oth-


ers. "The bottom line is that they don't


need that data and we're not going to keep


that data again," Guzman said at the end of


the meeting, adding that local police offi-


cers and firefighters agreed with his deci-


sion.


Coles praised the decision and noted


that there has been a "very positive out-


come from an inauspicious beginning,"


because now the Union City police and


AIDS rights groups are working together


to make sure health authorities understand


the specific kinds of exposures the police


and firefighters face. "In addition, we are


- planning to to jointly devise policies which


will protect public safety officers from


HIV infection while also protecting the


privacy of HIV infected people," he added.


Coles noted that there is virtually no


risk of HIV transmission to a public safety


officer in the course of duty. "During this


entire epidemic, with over a million indi-


viduals infected with HIV, there has not


been a single documented case of a police


officer or other public safety officer


becoming infected with HIV on the job,"


he said.


"Moreover, by telling officers the


names of a small portion of those who are


HIV infected, rather than following the


`universal precautions' prescribed by the


U.S. Centers for Disease Control, a police


department runs the risk that the officers


will assume that they need be concerned


only about those who are identified, and


will use the precautions selectively,"


Coles added.


Coles charged that gathering the names


in police computers and broadcasting them


to officers - a practice which has cropped


up in a number of cities throughout the


United States - is a violation of the con-


stitutional right to privacy.


Public health authorities throughout


California have complained for years that


the greatest single obstacle to stopping the


spread of AIDS is the fear HIV infected


people have that the government will keep


files on them and tell others about their


condition. "The policy of gathering and


disseminating the names of HIV infected


individuals is a disservice to the officers


and to the public health," Coles charged.


The fact that the Union City police


were gathering and keeping data on HIV


infected persons came to light when a


reporter from the Fremont Argus over-


heard the information about an individual


on a police scanner. The Argus reporter


wrote that when patrol cars are dispatched,


the computer is checked, and if it shows


that an individual at the location to which


the car is being dispatched has HIV, the


officers are so informed.


In a strongly worded letter to Police


Chief Guzman, Coles had called the prac-


tice "misguided and dangerous," and


demanded that it be halted. In response to


Coles's letter, Guzman temporarily halted


the practice and set up the August meeting.


Estes Elected Board Chair


r. Milton Estes, a family physi-


D cian in Marin County who has a


long history of activism on


women's health and AIDS issues, was


elected as the new Chair of the ACLU-NC


Board of Directors. Estes, who is the first


openly gay person to be elected to this


post, has been on the Board since 1985


and previously served as the Vice-Chair.


Estes has played a key role as Chair of


the Development Committee of the


ACLU-NC. "Milton has provided out-


standing leadership to our organization


and played a major role in securing the


resources that we need to fight the current


attacks on civil liberties. He has signifi-


cantly strengthened our ability to meet the


major challenges to reproductive rights,


discrimination against people with HIV


and civil rights that we face today," said


ACLU-NC Executive Director Dorothy


Ehrlich.


Estes has a long history of serving the


ACLUers Honored


Bill Tamayo


ACLU-NC Board member Bill


Tamayo, an attomey with the Asian Law


Caucus, was honored on September 13 by


Asian Americans for Community


Involvement at their Fifth Annual


Freedom Awards Banquet.


Tamayo is chairperson of the National


Network for Immigrant and Refugee


Rights and also serves on the board of the


Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee


Rights and Services. He was honored for


his leadership work in immigrant and refu-


gee rights and his continuing efforts in the


civil rights arena.


Michael Laurence


Attorney Michael Laurence, Director


of the ACLU-NC Death Penalty Project,


was honored at the first annual awards din-


ner of Death Penalty Focus on October 19


in Los Angeles.


Laurence was honored by the statewide


abolitionist group along with Charles


Sevilla and Michael McCabe as "the legal


team whose valiant efforts have thus far


prevented the execution of Robert Harris


in San Quentin's gas chamber."


Actor Mike Farrell, a well-known acti-


vist and star of the TV series M*A*S*H,


was also awarded for his successful efforts


to prevent the execution of Virginia death


row inmate and recognized legal scholar


Joe Giarratano. The keynote speaker of


the evening was Sam Reese Sheppard, the


son of Dr. Sam Sheppard who was wrong-


fully convicted and subsequently exoner-


ated of his wife's murder, who is active in


SOLACE, an organization that provides


support to the families of murder victims.


Death Penalty Focus was formed in


1988 as a nonprofit organization dedicated


to the abolition of capital punishment.


Among the members of its Advisory


Committee are former California Supreme


Court Justice Joseph Grodin, former


Govemor Pat Brown, actor Danny Glover


and Joan Baez.


affiliate in many capacities. He has been


the Chair of the Marin County Chapter,


Chair of the Nominating Committee and


the Officer Nominating Committee. He


also served on the committee to develop


the ACLU-NC AIDS policy, the Staff


Salaries and Benefits Committee, and


numerous ad hoc policy and organizational


committees.


Estes, a family practitioner in Mill


Valley and an Associate Professor of


Obstetrics and Gynecology at _ the


University of.California, has an extensive


history of activism around the issues of


allocation of health resources and women's


health issues. He is the primary provider


for HIV positive patients in Marin County


and has helped develop both the AIDS


Response Plan and a publicly funded clinic


for HIV positive patients in Marin.


Estes was named Physician of the Year


in 1989 by the Marin Medical Society and


honored by the Marin Chapter of the


ACLU with its Benjamin Dreyfus Award.


He also serves as Chair of the Marin


Medical Society AIDS Committee, as a


member of the editorial board of BIRTH -


Issues in Perinatal Care and Education,


Bay Area Physicians for Human Rights,


Physicians for Social Responsibility, and


the Community Consortium, a Bay Area


organization of health care providers for


HIV infected people.


A 1968 graduate of the University of


Chicago Medical School, Estes was the


Medical Director of the Orange Cove


Family Health Center, a federally funded


clinic serving farmworkers in_ rural


California.


Other newly elected Board officers


include U.C. Santa Clara law professor


Margaret Russell, Chair of the Legal


Committee; Fran. Strauss, Chair of the


Development Committee; Joanne Lewis,


Chair. of the Field Committee; Anne


Jennings, Chair of the Legislative


Committee; and Tom Lockard, Treasurer.


Estes replaces former Board Chir H.


Lee Halterman, counsel to Representative


Ron Dellums, who will continue as a


Board member.


aclu news


8 issues a year, monthly except bi-monthly in January-February, June-July, August-


September and October/November.


Published by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California


H. Lee Halterman, Chairperson


Dorothy Ehrlich, Executive Director


Elaine Elinson, Editor


Marcia Gallo, Field Page


ZesTop Publishing, Design and Production


1663 Mission St., 4th Floor


San Francisco, California 94103


(415) 621-2488


Membership $20 and up, of which 50 cents is for a subscription to theaclu news and 50


cents is for the national ACLU bi-monthly publication, Civil Liberties.


Seip


oan strates


Ge x


aclu news


nov 1991 3


Freedom of Expression ...


Continued from page I


book of poetry A Coney Island of the


Mind has sold almost a million copies and


influenced generations of Americans, is


also co-founder of San Francisco's


City Lights Books and continues to be


its principal owner and editor. Long .


associated with the :


San. .--s"erraicisco


Renaissance and the


"Beat Generation,"


Ferlinghetti is com


mitted as both poet and citizen to the


vision of American community that was


Walt Whitman's.


Jazz musician Jon Jang is the com-


poser of "Reparations Now!" which is fea-


tured on the Pan Asian Arkestra's debut


recording Never Give Up. His current


work, "Tienanmen" will feature guest art-


ist Liu Qi Chao and will premiere in June


1992 for the third anniversary of the


Tienanmen massacre. Jang, whose works


have been commissioned by the National


Endowment for the Arts, the Ford


Foundation and Max Roach, is also a sub-


ject of KQED-TV's "Creative Mind" doc-


umentary series.


June Jordan, a poet, essayist, play-


wright and political activist, has been


called "one of the world's most articulate


and essential voices." The author of 19


books, she is the most published African-


American writer in history. Her latest,


Naming Our Destiny, appeared to critical


and popular acclaim in 1989. Her work


has been anthologized in virtually every


major anthology of contemporary poetry


and her articles have appeared in publica-


tions ranging from Mademoiselle and


Essence to The New York Times. She is


currently a Professor of


African American


Studies and Women's


Studies at the University of


California at Berkeley.


The Oakland Interfaith


Gospel Choir, directed by


Terrance Kelly, is an award-


winning choir. The 55-


member, multi-racial, multi-


cultural group has sung


throughout the United


States.


Modem dancer,


teacher and choreogra-


pher June Watanabe is


the artistic director of


her own company


and a professor of


dance at Mills


College. An award-


winning dancer, who


Dancer June Watanabe


Arne Folkdal


has also been the


subject of KQED-


TV's "Creative


Mind" series, Wata-


nabe's solo and epic


works, intuitive and


personal, reflect the


Japanese American cul-


ture and themes of wom-


anhood.


Marga Gomez, comic,


actress and writer, was


voted the Entertainer of the


Year at the San Francisco


Cable Car Awards in 1989 and


1990. She has appeared on public


television's Comedy Tonight and


numerous comedy clubs; her one


woman show "Memory Tricks", the


story of her showgirl mom, received


wide acclaim when it debuted in 1991.


The Bill of Rights Day Celebration


will be held at the St. Francis Hotel on


Union Square in San Francisco on


Sunday, December 15. The program


will begin at 5:00 PM with a no-host bar


and reception at 4:00 PM. The hotel is


wheelchair accessible and ASL sign


interpretation will be provided. Tickets


are $15.00 and .$8.00 (for low-income/ |


seniors/students).


To order tickets, please send a check


and a self-addressed stamped envelope


to:


Bill of Rights Day Celebration


ACLU-NC


1663 Mission Street, #460


San Francisco 94103 or


call Field Representative Nancy Otto


at 415/621-2493.


English Only Workplace Rule Struck Down


by Ahsan Janoo


District Court Judge Robert Schnacke


ruled on October 4 that a San


Francisco meat processing company's rule


requiring its employees to speak only


English at work violates federal law. The


first decision by a federal judge concern-


- ing English-only rules in the workplace,


this ruling arrives amidst a proliferation of


such rules at worksites in California and


around the country.


I a ground-breaking decision, U.S.


The lawsuit (Garcia v. Spun Steak)


was filed on behalf of two Spanish-


speaking women workers at the Spun


Steak Company of South San Francisco


by Ed. Chen of the- ACEU-NC


Christopher Ho of the Employment Law


Center of the Legal Aid Society of San


Francisco and cooperating attorneys


William Orrick and Ruben Iniguez of the


San Francisco law firm of Coblentz,


Cahen, McCabe and Breyer.


Judge Schnacke declared that the com-


pany had violated Title VII of the Civil


Rights Act of 1964 by forcing its employ-


ees to speak English only at work. Title


VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits


discrimination in employment on the basis


of national origin, race, sex, color and


religion.


The court's decision was preceded by a


similar rendering from the Equal


Employment Opportunity Commission


(EEOC), responsible for enforcing Title


VII, when it investigated a complaint filed


by the attorneys on behalf of the two


Latino workers, Maricela Buitrago and


Priscilla Garcia, against the company. The


workers had been disciplined by a super-


visor for speaking Spanish on the job.


The company, however, did not


rescind its English-only policy after the


EEOC determination. The lawsuit, filed


on June 26, sought an injunction from the


court to halt the discriminatory policy.


After hearing oral arguments, Judge


Schnacke made his ruling from the bench,


rejecting the meat company's justification


for the language rule because it did not


demonstrate any neutral business neces-


sity, the only criterion under federal regu-


lation which can justify English-only


rules in the workplace. He stated that the


company's supposed attempt to control


racial disharmony by imposing a factory-


wide language restriction amounted to


"overkill." Less restrictive alternatives


were available, he added.


The factory workers' jobs involve tak-


ing frozen meat products from conveyor


belts and packing them into boxes for


wholesale distribution. Plaintiff Garcia


said, "There is no reason from any busi-


ness standpoint, safety-related or other-


wise, why such a rule is needed."


Cooperating attomey Iniguez noted


that the decision will ensure that employ-


ers reconsider any language restrictions


they place on their workers. "It serves to


put employers on notice that in order to


comply with the law, the courts will


require them to have business justification


for their policies," Iniguez said.


The ACLU-NC has fought English-


only rules at worksites throughout


California. In 1989, the EEOC deter-


mined, in response to a complaint filed by


Chen on behalf of hospital workers at the


University of California at San Francisco,


that the English-only policy of the


University was unlawful. According to


Chen, the significance of the court's ruling


lies in the fact that it is the first ruling on


English-only workplace rules by a


_ California federal judge.


The California Legislature recently


passed a bill by Senator Marks (SB 834)


to restrict the usage of English-only rules


in the workplace. The bill was vetoed by


Governor Wilson on October 12. Calling


the Governor's action "unfortunate,"


cooperating attorney Orrick explained that


"the bill would would have had the effect


of clarifying what the state regulations


already are, which is that English-only


rules are discriminatory, absent business


necessity."


Ahsan Janoo is an intern in the Public


Information Department.


Challenge Gift Boosts Fall Fund Campaign


by Cheri Bryant


_ACLU-NC Development Director


r | 1 he ACLU-NC Foundation kicked-


off its annual Major Gifts


Campaign on October 10 in the


midst of the Thomas confirmation hear-


ings and everyone was acutely aware of


the need for the ACLU's work in these


threatening times. With issues of police


brutality and curtailment of reproductive


rights on the minds of many ACLU mem-


bers, Campaign volunteers agreed that


there is much to discuss with donors dur-


ing the fall fundraising effort.


"The Campaign is structured as a way


to reach out to our friends and update


them on the current work of the ACLU,"


explained Fran Strauss, Chair of the


Development Committee. "Of course, we


want our donors to renew their support.


But what is even more important, we want


to hear from them, and we want to let


them know what our priorities are."


Fifty fundraising volunteers will be |


meeting with more than 200 prospective _


supporters over the next few months.as a


part of the Campaign. They are organized


into five teams, each with a team captain:


Dick Grosboll, Lee Halterman, Davis


Riemer,


Young. The goal for the Fall fundraising


effort is $383,000.


"This. year we are very fortunate to


John Rutherford and Julius ~


$360,0000x2122


- $330,000


L$ 300,000


$270,000


$240,000


$210,000


$180,000,


$150,000"


$1 20,0094


oe


$90,000,


ty


yy Yin;


Y?


have a Challenge Gift that will help to


boost support at the Founders Circle level


of the Campaign," said Milton Estes,


newly elected Board Chair.


Estes explained that the Challenge


Gift, offered by a generous donor, means


that the ACLU will receive a dollar match


to any donor who. makes a new gift, or


increases their support, in the $2,500 -


$10,000 range. All of the gift, not just the


increase, will be matched by the anony-


mous donor, up to a total of $35,000.


"We expect this to be an attractive


incentive to some of our loyal supporters


at the $1,000 level and above," Estes said.


"The donor of the Challenge Gift wants to


remain anonymous, but I can say that the


donor is a longtime ACLU supporter who


is very concerned about the current cli-


mate, in the courts and generally, of hos-


tility towards civil liberties. Through this


gift, the donor is expressing that concern


and encouraging philanthropic activism as


a means to move forward in the struggle


to preserve civil liberties.


"This gift, and all gifts to the


Campaign, are especially significant in


this, the 200th Anniversary of the Bill of


Rights. There is much to celebrate in that


anniversary, yet our donors recognize that .


there is still such a long way to go until


the guarantees enumerated in that docu-


ment are fully realized for all Americans,"


he added.


For more information about the


Challenge Gift or the Campaign, call


Cheri Bryant at 621-2493.


aclu news


nov 1991


Teachers Conference Inaugurates


ACLU-NC Friedman Project


n September 21, educators and


students from throughout the Bay


Area joined ACLU-NC staff,


Board members, and friends at the inaugu-


ral conference of the the new Howard A.


Friedman First Amendment Education


Project.


"Teaching the First Amendment in the


Bicentennial Year" brought together attor-


neys, teachers, and education activists for


a day of discussion on the history and cur-


rent status of First Amendment rights,


with special emphasis on their application


to high school students. One panel,


"Diversity and Conflict," featured five


high school teachers who have developed


programs to deal with an increasingly


diverse student population and the impor-


tance of freedom of expression in chal-


lenging racism, sexism, homophobia, and


class bias.


Each participant received a binder full


of materials on First Amendment issues.


A special section, entitled "Teaching the


Firs. Amendment to High School


Students: Curriculum Ideas, Activities,


and Strategies for English and Social


Studies Teachers" was written for confer-


ence attendees by Education Project chair


Dale Brodsky, a civil rights attomey spe-


cializing in employment discrimination


who is now in the process of becoming a


high school teacher.


Conference participants were wel-


comed by ACLU-NC Executive Director


Dorothy M. Ehrlich; sessions were mod-


erated by Education Project chair Brodsky


and Marcia Gallo, the Project's director.


Law, Resources and Student Life


The day began with a session on the


development of First Amendment law,


presented by Ann Brick, ACLU-NC staff


attorney and advisor to the Education


Project. Beverly Tucker, ACLU-NC


Board member and Chief Counsel with the


California Teachers' Association, dis-


cussed the differences between state and


federal constitutional law. A session on


current First Amendment issues in the


schools featured ACLU-NC staff attorney


Alan Schlosser on dress codes, Brick on


book banning and Brodsky on school


prayer.


"Diversity and Conflict - Programs


Designed to Promote Debate, Discussion,


and Understanding Among High School


Students," featured a lively discussion by


local high school teachers and activists,


including Rob Birle, spokesperson for the


Bay Area Network of Gay and Lesbian


Educators; Joyce Hawkins and Ken


Obeso, Ethnic Studies teachers at


Berkeley High School; Effie Pandell, vet-


eran San Francisco social studies and


Street Law instructor at Washington High


School; and Stan Pesick, Skyline High


School social studies teacher in Oakland.


A nuts-and-bolts session on "Sources


and Resources" was presented by M.


Anne Jennings, ACLU-NC Board mem-


ber, environmental lawyer, and former


high school teacher, who gave tips on


doing legal research; and Dan Nealand,


Assistant Director with the National


Archives, Pacific Sierra Region, who


spoke on the use of original documents in


teaching.


Inaugural Reception


Following the Conference, participants


joined members of the Howard A.


Friedman family, San Francisco Superior


Court Judge Donna Hitchens, and ACLU-


NC Board Chair Milton Estes at a recep-


tion to inaugurate the Project. Family


leader Phyllis Friedman painted a vivid


verbal picture of her late husband's vision


of civil rights and civil liberties, and


expressed her family's pleasure in the


development of the Howard A. Friedman


First Amendment Education Project.


"Thanks a million,' wrote a teacher


from Berkeley. "I'm using the Freedom of


Religion materials right now and sharing


them with colleagues...feeling more confi-


dent in dealing with these issues and their


complexity thanks to your workshop and


`the superior, easy to use materials you


have produced."


The next event of the Howard A.


Friedman First Amendment Education


Project is a Students' Conference, "SAY


WHAT??!! Students Celebrate


Freedom of Expression," on December


11 at San Francisco State University. A


Students' Advisory Committee is being


organized to help plan the conference.


For more information on the Project,


the Student Conference or the Students'


Advisory Committee, contact Marcia


Gallo at 415/621-2493.


Minors Rights ...


Continued from page I


and held that in California the state may


burden the procreative choices of adoles-


cent women only if it proves that the


restriction is necessary to achieve a com-


pelling public interest.


Plaintiffs contend that laws mandating


adult authorization for teenagers' abortions


rest on generalizations about family life


and adolescent behavior that are empiri-


cally unsupported.


"The real issue here is whether stereo-


typic assumptions - for example, that all


parents can and will provide helpful coun-


sel to their pregnant daughters or that teen-


agers make rash or uninformed decisions


about pregnancy - can justify infringing


teenagers' fundamental rights of procrea-


tive choice and privacy," said Shostak.


At the trial, counselors, medical person-


nel and judges from states where parental


consent or notification laws are in effect


have testified about the disastrous effect of


such laws on the physical, mental and emo-


tional health of teenagers who are forced to


confront unsympathetic parents or navigate


a formidable judicial system to obtain a


court order for abortion. Paula Wendt,


Director of the Meadowbrook Women's


Clinic in Minnesota, testified about the


judicial bypass process, the role of clinics


in the process and the detrimental impact


on the health and welfare of minors in her


state, where a similar law is in effect.


Physicians, psychologists, trained coun-


selors, and sociologists have testified about


California's current system for ensuring


informed consent.


Dr. Anita Nelson, an _ obstetrician-


gynecologist at the Harbor UCLA Medical


_Center and director of seven county family


planning clinics in Los Angeles, testified


about the counseling practices and proce-


dures for teenagers who find themselves


pregnant. She spoke movingly of runaway-


teenagers, girls from undocumented fami-


lies, and teens from homes where parents


have many mental or substance abuse


problems who, in addition to medical help,


look to the clinics for information, support


and confidentiality. "As a doctor, I am


trained to do no harm," she said, adding


that great harm would be done to teens if


they were forced to tell their parents or a


judge about a pregnancy or abortion.


"For many years, California law has


allowed minors to consent to specific med-


ical services in order to encourage them to


seek care for conditions-such as preg-


nancy and sexually transmitted disease-


that, without medical treatment, would


jeopardize their health," said English.


National significance


California's lawsuit has become espe-


cially significant in light of the United


States Supreme Court's 1990 decisions in


Hodgson v. Minnesota and Ohio v. Akron


Center for Reproductive Health, upholding


parental notification statutes in Minnesota


and Ohio.


"California has a pioneering history in


its state constitutional protection for repro-


ductive choice," said Crosby.


"For over 20 years, California courts


have recognized a fundamental right to


Chapter Meetings


(Chapter meetings are open to all interested


members. Contact the chapter activist listed


for your area.)


B-A-R-K _ (Berkeley-Albany-Richmond-


Kensington) Chapter Meeting: (Usually


fourth Thursday) Volunteers needed for the


chapter hotline -- call Florence Piliavin at


415/848-5195 for further details. For more


information, time and address of meetings,


contact Julie Houk, 415/848-4752.


Earl Warren (Oakland/Alameda County)


Chapter Meeting: (Usually second


Wednesday) Meetings on Wednesday,


November 13 and December 11. The Earl


Warren Chapter is sponsoring a high school


essay contest this fall. For time and


address of meetings, please call Irv


Kermish, 415/836-4036 or Abe Feinberg,


415/451-1122.


Fresno Chapter Meeting: (Usually third


Monday) Meeting on Monday, November


18 and December 16 at San Joaquin Law


School. New members always welcome!


For more information, call Nadya Coleman


at 209/229-7178 (days) or A.J. Kruth at


209/432-1483 (evenings). ;


Gay Rights Chapter Meeting: (Usually


first Thursday) Meet Thursday, November


7 and December 5 at the ACLU Office,


1663 Mission, 460, San Francisco at 7:00


PM. Volunteers welcome to mailing party on


November 5, starting at 5:30 PM. For more


information, contact Teresa Friend, 415/


272-9700.


Marin County Chapter Meeting: (Third


Monday) Meet Monday, November 18 and


December 16 at 7:30 PM, Westamerica


Bank, East Blithedale and Sunnyside


Avenues, Mill Valley. For more informa-


tion, contact Harvey Dinerstein, 415/381-


6129.


Mid-Peninsula (Palo Alto area) Chapter


Meeting: (Usually first Thursday) Annual


Meeting and Dinner on Wednesday,


November 6 at 6:30 PM at the Holiday Inn,


Palo Alto. Dinner and Reception with guest


speaker PC pioneer and publisher and


ACLU-NC Board member David Bunnell


on Computers and Technology:


Implications On Civil Liberties For The


Next Generation. ACLU-NC Executive


Director Dorothy Ehrlich and Friedman


Education Project Director Marcia Gallo


will also speak; Admission is $20 - $30.


Meeting on Thursday, December 5. New


members welcome! For more information,


contact Harry Anisgard, 415/856-9186 or


call the Chapter Hotline at 415/328-0732.


Monterey County Chapter Meeting:


(Usually first Tuesday) Meetings on


Tuesday, December 3 at 7:30 PM at the


Monterey Library, Community Room,


Pacific and Madison Streets, Monterey. For


more information, contact Richard Criley,


408/624-7562.


Mt. Diablo (Contra Costa County)


Chapter Meeting: (Usually fourth


Thursday) For more information, contact


Mildred Starkie, 415/934-0557.


North Peninsula (San Mateo area)


Chapter Meeting: (Usually third Monday)


Meet Monday, November 18 and December


16. at 7:30 PM at the offices of Planned


Parenthood, 2211 Palm Avenue, San Mateo.


Note: The North Pen Chapter has a new


Hotline number: 579-1789. For more


Field Program Monthly


Meetings


information, contact Emily Skolnick at 340-


9834.


North Valley (Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehema, and


Trinity Counties) Chapter Meeting:


(Usually fourth Wednesday) For more


information contact Frank Treadway, 916/


365-4336 or 916/241-7725.


Sacramento Valley Chapter Meeting:


(Usually second Wednesday) Meet


Wednesday, November 13 and December 11


at 7:00 PM at Hearing Room 1, Sacramento


County Offices, 700 H Street. For more


information, contact Ruth Ordas, 916/488-


9956


San Francisco Chapter Meeting: (Usually


third Monday) Meet Wednesday, November


18 and December 16 7:00 PM. at ACLU


office, 1663 Mission, 460, San Francisco.


For more information, call the Chapter


Information Line at 415/979-6699.


Santa Clara Valley Chapter Meeting:


(Usually first Tuesday) Meet Tuesday,


November 5 and December 3 at 7:00 PM at


the Commerce Bank Building, 111 West St.


John Street, 2nd Floor Conference Room,


San Jose. Contact John Holly, 408/554-


9478, for further information.


Santa Cruz County Chapter Meeting:


(Usually second Wednesday) Board meeting


on Wednesday, December 11. The Santa


Cruz Chapter will have its Annual


Meeting on Wednesday, December 4 at the


Louden Nelson Community Center.


Featured speaker will be Margaret Pena,


ACLU-NC Legislative Director. Chapter


will continue to work on combating Hate


Crimes. Contact Keith Lesar, 408/688-1666,


for further information.


Sonoma County Chapter Meeting: (Third


Thursday of the month) Meet Thursday,


November 21 and December 19 at 7:30 PM,


821 Mendocino Ave, Santa Rosa. All mem-


bers welcome. Contact Len Bronstein at


707/527-9018


Yolo County Chapter Meeting: (Third


Thursday of the month) The Yolo County


Chapter will co-sponsor a panel on Hate


Speech on Wednesday, November 20 at the


Jewish Fellowship Building. Regular meet-


ing on Thursday, December 19. For more


information, contact Alan Bronstein at 916/


752-2586.


Field Action


Meetings


(All meetings except those noted will be held


at the ACLU-NC Office, 1663 Mission


Street, Suite 460, San Francisco.)


Student Outreach Committee: (Usually


third Saturday) Contact Marcia Gallo, at


ACLU-NC 415/621(c)2493.


Civil Rights Committee: (Fourth Saturday)


Meeting on Saturday, November 23 from


10:00 AM to 11:30 AM. No meeting in


December. RSVP to Nancy Otto at the


ACLU-NC 415/621-2493.


First Amendment Committee: (Fourth


Saturday) Meeting on Saturday, November


23 from 12:00 PM to 1:30 PM. No meeting


in December. RSVP to Nancy Otto at the


ACLU-NC 415/621-2493.


Pro-Choice Action Campaign: Contact


Nancy Otto at the ACLU-NC 415/621-2493.


choose abortion that is both independent of


Roe v. Wade and more encompassing than


the federal constitutional guarantee," she


said.


With the departure of Justices Brennan


and Marshall from the United States


- Supreme Court, and federal constitutional


protection for the right to choose in serious


jeopardy, pro-choice attorneys are hoping


that American Academy of Pediatrics v.


Lungren will become an important prece-


dent that continues California's leadership


in state constitutional protection for repro-


ductive rights. The case is being closely


watched because 41 states have similar


parental involvement laws; about twenty


are in effect, the remainder are under court


injunction.


"The challenged law would tum back


the clock more than twenty years on


California adolescents' right of access to


reproductive health care with disastrous


effects on their health and welfare," said


English.


"SAY WHAT? ?!!..."


Students Celebrating


Freedom of Expression


Conference


Wed, December 11


9:00 A.M. TO 2:00 P.M.


(Lunch included)


San Francisco State University


Guest Center


South State Drive and Lake Merced Blvd.


San Francisco


FREE to high school juniors and seniors


(other students may apply)


TO REGISTER: Call Marcia Gallo at


415/621-2493. Everyone must register by


November 23, 1991. The Conference is free,


but limited to 300 people - so call today!


Page: of 4