vol. 56, no. 1

Primary tabs

aclu news


NON-PROFIT


ORGANIZATION


U.S. POSTAGE


PAID


PERMIT NO. 4424


SAN FRANCISCO, CA


Volume LVI


january/february 1992


No. 1


Anti-War Vets Sue Army for Assault,


Detention at Parade


n December 19 the ACLU-NC


filed a suit in U.S. District Court


charging that the First and Fourth


Amendment rights of a group of anti-war


veterans were violated when the veterans


were attacked, seized and searched by


Military Police as they attempted to exer-


cise their freedom of expression at a post-


Gulf War Armed Forces Day parade in


May.


" The plaintiffs, Veterans Speakers


Alliance members Paul Cox, William H.


Eisman, Marc Kiselicka, Robert Leedy,


Keith Mather, Scott Rutherford, and John


Wike are represented by ACLU-NC staff


attorney Alan Schlosser and cooperating


attorneys Tower C. Snow, Jr., Koji E.


Felton, Michelle Bryan Oroschakoff and


Pamela S. Kelly of Shearman and Sterling.


Speaking at a press conference


announcing the suit, attorney Felton said,


"Shearman and Sterling is proud to repre-


sent the Veterans Speakers Alliance as a


cooperating attorney for the ACLU of


Northern California. On this 200th anni-


versary of the Bill of Rights, it is particu-


larly disturbing that members of the U.S.


Army, who swear to protect and uphold


the Constitution, would violate the consti-


tutional rights of the Veterans Speakers


Alliance."


Invited to join


On May 18, the Bay Area Chamber of


Commerce and the Armed Forces jointly


sponsored the Armed Forces Day Parade


in San Francisco to welcome home mili-


tary troops from the war in the Persian


Gulf. The Veterans Speakers Alliance, an


organization of veterans opposed to war,


responding to a call for veterans' groups to


participate in the parade, asked to join the


parade, and was expressly invited by the


organizers to take part.


Members of the Veterans Speakers Alliance spread their anti-war message in


classrooms and in the streets.


The Alliance contingent marched in its


designated place in the parade. As its


members approached the reviewing stand


inside the Presidio Army Base where


Governor Pete Wilson, San Francisco


Mayor Art Agnos and other government


and military dignitaries were seated, they


began to unfurl banners and placards they


had brought with them. The banners and


placards complied with size limitations


and other requirements set by the march


organizers. The messages they carried


were explicitly anti-war, among them,


"Veterans Say No War," and "Study War


No More."


As soon as members of the VSA


began to display their messages, they


were attacked without warning by


Military Police. When the MP's attempted


to confiscate the banners and placards,


some of the members asserted their First


Amendment right to free expression and


refused to yield their signs. Several of the


Pro-Choice Activists Defend


Roe v. Wade


uman billboards, marches, rallies


and even a colorful pro-choice


cable car carrying its message -


through the streets of San Francisco com-


memorated the January 22 anniversary of


Roe v. Wade, the landmark U.S. Supreme _


Court decision protecting a woman's right


to choose.


This year's


actions took on added


significance because


the day before the


U.S. Supreme Court


announced that it


would hear argu-


ments in Casey vy.


Planned Parenthood,


the ACLU case chal-


lenging Pennsylva-


nia's restrictive abor-


tion law. "This law


is a frontal assault on


the right to privacy


recognized in Roe,


said ACLU attomey Kathryn Kolbert who


will argue the case before the high court


this spring. "The court is likely to use this


case to abolish fundamental constitutional


rights to choose abortion or birth control


- rights that millions of American


women have relied on for the last 18


years."


A tuling is expected in the case by


early July. "Americans must not allow


the Justices to have the last word on their


right to choose," said Kolbert. She


announced that the ACLU is launching a


nationwide campaign to secure - by fed-


eral statute or, if necessary, by constitu-


tional amendment - the fundamental


Jean Field


right of privacy - "a right the Supreme


Court is ready to eliminate. Together we


can guarantee the right of reproductive


choice for all Americans," Kolbert added.


Watch the next issue of the ACLU


News for more information on the ACLU


campaign or call ACLU-NC Field


Representative Nancy Otto at 415/621-


2493.


Courtesy Veterans Speakers Alliance


veterans were then thrown up against a


fence, handcuffed, searched and detained.


At no time throughout the incident did any


of them attempt or threaten to physically


harm the MPs. Some of the anti-war vete-


rans were surrounded and prevented from


moving freely by Military Police. They


were then forced to exit the Presidio under


guard. Subsequently, some members


received notices barring them from reenter-


ing the Presidio and other Bay Area mili-


tary installations.


Swords to plowshares


Plaintiff Paul Cox said, "We marched


in the parade to welcome our brothers and


sisters who made it back, and to moum the


dead on all sides. Our participation was


appropriate. War should never be cele-


brated, it should always be mourned.


"The parade was a lie, and we felt as


veterans we had to say so. They honor


war; but war is not honorable - how dare


we celebrate death and destruction? If ever


there was a time that we should be beating


our swords into plowshares, this is it," said


Cox.


According to attorney Schlosser, "This


parade was intended to be a demonstration


of San Francisco's patriotic support for the


Gulf War. Clearly, the actions taken by the


Military Police against the Veterans


Speakers Alliance were an attempt to erad-


icate an expression of opposition to the


war.


"Censorship based on political view-


point is plainly prohibited by the First


Amendment. We hope in this case to


establish that even military police are


bound by this basic principle of the Bill of


Rights," Schlosser added.


The suit seeks a declaratory judgment


that the MPs' actions were violations of


the plaintiffs' rights. The suit also seeks


damages and a permanent injunction from


the Court restraining the Military Police


from "prohibiting the lawful exercise of


rights guaranteed under the First


Amendment, and from searching and seiz-


ing individuals based solely on the exer-


cise of their First Amendment rights."


aclu news


jan - feb 1992


Dateline: Sacramento


1991 Legislative Review and Outlook


by Francisco Lobaco


ACLU Legislative Advocate


Civil Liberties in Review


he 1991 legislative session began


} with the expectation that Governor


Pete Wilson would be more willing


to sign civil rights and civil liberties leg-


islation than his predecessor Governor


George Deukmejian. However by the end


of the year, it was common knowledge


that Governor Wilson was no friendlier to


civil liberties than the previous governor.


Every important civil rights bill that


passed the Legislature was vetoed by


Govermor Wilson. The vetoes of AB 101


and SB 827 caused strong public outcry.


SB 827 (Bergeson) would have reauthor-


ized the Fair Employment and Housing


Commission the right to award compen-


satory and limited civil penalties in cases


of employment discrimination. AB 101


(Friedman) would have prohibited dis-


crimination in employment on the basis


of sexual orientation. In addition, SB 834


(Marks), co-sponsored by the ACLU,


was also vetoed. That bill would have


prohibited English-only workplace rules


unless justified by a business necessity.


We can expect these anti-discrimination


bills to be reintroduced next year.


For the second consecutive year, a


State budget was adopted without Meedi-


Cal abortion restrictions. The ACLU was


able to defeat restrictive abortion amend-


ments. Similarly, all anti-choice bills


were either defeated in Committee or


made into two-year bills. This included


efforts to prohibit abortions for the pur-


pose of sex selection, and legislation


imposing burdensome abortion reporting


requirements on health facilities.


Despite the state and national atten-


tion surrounding the use of excessive


force by the police resulting from the


police beating of Rodney King in Los


Angeles, police groups were busy in


Sacramento promoting legislation which


would greatly expand their rights in disci-


plinary actions and create more secrecy


around documents which are part of citi-


zens' complaints. One example was AB


2067 which, among other things, would


require 24-hour notice to any officer by


his or her superior before the officer


could be questioned about any matter


under investigation. The bill's provisions


would make it extremely difficult for


police agencies and Civilian Review


Boards to adequately investigate charges


of police misconduct. AB 2067 was made


into a two-year bill and will be heard next


year.


A major disappointment this year in


the First Amendment area was Governor


Wilson's veto of SB 341 (Lockyer). This


bill would have required plaintiffs to


establish a substantial probability of suc-


cess before proceeding with lawsuits


against persons engaged in free speech on


a public issue. Like similar bill vetoed


last year by Governor Deukmejian, this


bill was intended to provide procedural


protections from SLAPP suits. The legis-


lation will be reintroduced in 1992.


Finally, the long and heated legisla-


tive battle surrounding the rights of men-


tal patients to refuse powerful and often


dangerous psychotropic medication was


resolved. The ACLU was able to obtain


amendments to SB 665 (Petris) which


assured that mental patients could not be


forcibly drugged without a judicial or


quasi-judicial finding of incompetency or


in cases of emergency. SB 665 was


signed by the Governor.


The ACLU took a position on nearly


200 bills this Session. This report sum-


marizes the outcome of some of the most


important bills. Measures listed as two-


year bills will be heard next year.


Civil Rights


AB 101 (Friedman) would prohibit


discrimination in employment on the basis


of sexual orientation. The bill was


intensely lobbied by the ACLU, gay rights


organizations, and supported by a long list


of business, religious, and civil rights


groups, as well as the majority of


Californians. The Governor's veto sparked


widespread public outcry.


ACLU Position: SUPPORT


Status: Vetoed by the Governor


SB 827 (Bergeson) would overtum


recent Califomia Supreme Court decisions


by granting the Fair Employment Housing


Commission the specific authority to grant


actual and/or punitive damages in employ-


ment discrimination cases, including those


involving racial and sexual harassment.


ACLU Position: SUPPORT


Status: Vetoed by the Governor


SB 834 (Marks) codifies existing Fair


Employment and Housing Commission


regulations which prohibit Englist..- ly


i 1


nets


eae ae !


_ work place rules unless justified by a busi-


ness necessity. The bill ensures that


employees of diverse ethnic and cultural


backgrounds are protected from discrimi-


natory employment practices.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Vetoed by the Governor


SB 1257 (Roberti) clarifies that the


Unruh Civil Rights Act prohibits all


forms of arbitrary discrimination by busi-


ness establishments. This legislation


responds to a recent California Supreme


Court decision which overturned more


than 20 years of precedent by ruling that


the Unruh Act does not prohibit all forms


of arbitrary discrimination.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Two-year bill


AB 531 (Polanco) is intended to bring


California into compliance with the fed-


eral Fair Housing Act. The FHA author-


izes the federal enforcement agency to


award compensatory damages and assess


civil penalties to victims of housing dis-


crimination. The bill also contains the


protections provided to disabled individu-


als and families by the Fair Housing Act.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Two-year bill


AB 77 (Moore) is the parental leave


law which requires employers of 50 or


more persons to grant workers unpaid


leave of up to four months once every two


years to care for a dependent child or a


sick parent.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Signed by the Governor


AB 1286 (Vasconcellos) would


expand protection from discrimination in


employment and housing for persons with


physical and mental disabilities. The bill


would conform California's anti-


discrimination laws with the recently


enacted __ federal Americans with


Disabilities Act of 1990.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Two-year bill


-


AB 28 (Klehs), AB 94 (Friedman)


are both bills which deny state support for


large private clubs which discriminate


against women, minorities and others.


AB 28 would deny tax exempt status to


those private clubs. AB 94 would deny


alcoholic beverage licenses to similar pri-


vate clubs.


ACLU position:


SUPPORT BOTH BILLS


Status: AB 28 vetoed by the Governor;


AB 94 failed passage


Criminal Justice


SB 25 (Lockyer) is the sentencing


reform legislation intended to clarify the


state's complicated sentencing structure.


The ACLU opposes the bill because it


would result in longer prison sentences


by, among other things, permitting the


imposition of full consecutive sentences.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


SB 26 (Lockyer), SB 187 (Presley),


AB 1871 (Burton) seek to establish a


yp GA


" cccccenccese one cnn re a7 bee:


PaulA ta on


system of intensive probation supervision,


substance abuse treatment programs, and


other community-based options as alterna-


tives to state prison for nonviolent drug


offenders.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Two-year bills


AB 50 (Katz) would impose major sen-


tence increases to a long list of drug and


sexual offenses by reducing prison work


time credits given prisoners convicted of


these offenses for participation in work or


educational programs from 50% to 15%.


This legislation would cost the state bil-


lions of dollars in additional prison costs


over the next 10 to 15 years.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


SB 136 (Leonard) mandates driver's


license revocation for six months for con-


victions of any drug offense, including


possession of marijuana. In opposition, the


ACLU argued that this post conviction


penalty bears no rational relationship to the


underlying offense.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


AB 785 (Eaves) would permit courts to


admit expert testimony in criminal cases


concerning the effects of battered


woman's syndrome. Juries should be enti-


tled to consider evidence of this syndrome


in domestic violence situations to fully


understand how a defendant genuinely


believed she was in imminent danger of


harm.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Signed by the Governor


SB 982 (Davis) would impose a life


sentence on those who infect others with


the HIV virus by engaging in unprotected


sexual activity or by sharing a hypodermic


needle knowing that their blood is


infected. The ACLU noted that because


laws already exist which criminalize acts


which genuinely amount to attempted


homicide there is no need to construct a


specific statute to deal with AIDS. While


criminalization would not help deter the


spread of the virus it would permit the


state through the criminal justice system to


engage in significant intrusions into pri-


vate sexual activities. Such a law would


most likely be used selectively and discri-


minatorily against groups like gay men.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


SB 363 (Watson) provides funding for


the Department of Justice to gather data


and statistics on hate-motivated crimes.


There is growing evidence of an increase


in hate crimes and the ACLU supports this


bill in order to determine the scope of the


problem and provide information to help


devise strategies for addressing it.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Two-year bill


Death Penalty


AB 2156 (Bentley), ACA _ 10


(Bentley) were the Administration's pro-


posals to substantially modify habeas cor-


pus proceedings by, among other things,


eliminating legitimate grounds for appeals


in death penalty cases.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Failed in Assembly Public


Safety Committee


AB 96 (McClintock), AB 259


(Epple), AB 498 (Boland), AB 1759


(Knowles), AB 1958 (Knowles) were


death penalty bills which expanded the


death penalty in various ways including


situations where a child under 14 years of


age is killed, where death results from an


illegal drug transaction, or where someone


is killed as a result of gang activity. The


ACLU opposes the death penalty under all


circumstances.


ACLU position: OPPOSED ALL


BILLS


Status: All bills failed passage in


Assembly Public Safety Committee


Police Practices


AB 2221 (Floyd) would impose a


$5,000 civil penalty for release of police


records which are deemed "confidential"


under the penal code. The penalty would


impose a chilling effect on the release of


continued on page 6


aclu news


8 issues a year, monthly except bi-monthly in January-February, June-J. uly, August-


September and October/November.


Published by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California


Milton Estes, Chairperson


Dorothy Ehrlich, Executive Director


Elaine Elinson, Editor


Marcia Gallo, Field Page


ZesTop Publishing, Design and Production


1663 Mission St., 4th Floor


San Francisco, California 94103


(415) 621-2488


Membership $20 and up, of which 50 cents is for a subscription to theaclu news and 50


cents is for the national ACLU bi-monthly publication, Civil Liberties.


e = eat


Hi


aclu news


jan - feb 1992 3


Pe


Bicentennial of the Bill of


wh we we and


feted detalles


eee "


Rights


Ps


feted


AGU-NG Honors the Bicentennial of the Bill of Rights


n commemmorating the Bicentennial


of the Bill of Rights, the American


Civil Liberties Union of Northern


I


California honors more than a piece of


parchment, more even than the basic prin-


ciples outlined in that document 200 years


ago.


The ACLU celebrates the individu-


als whose struggles bring that document


to life. Many people fought and died to


define the freedoms guaranteed by these


amendments, and their example gave oth-


ers whose rights were denied the courage


to demand them. Those struggles con-


tinue today, and are waged in courtrooms,


classrooms and on the streets by people


not even envisioned by the writers of the


Constitution.


As part of its celebration of the


Bicentennial of the Bill of Rights, the


ACLU-NC honors individuals like Fred


Korematsu, who fought the internment of


Japanese Americans during World War II


all the way to the Supreme Court.


Yolanda Cortez, a hospital dietitian, who


successfully fought the "English only"


rule at her workplace. And James


Camarillo, who called on the ACLU-NC


to help stop the policy of segregating


HIV-positive inmates, which denied them


access to education and rehabilitation.


These people, and hundreds like them,


have worked to ensure that the Bill of


Rights is continually on display in our


daily life.


The projects commemorating the


Bicentennial include a photography


exhibit of people the ACLU-NC has rep-


resented in their civil rights battles. "The


Human Face of the Struggle for Civil


Liberties" will be on display at San


Francisco City Hall and San Francisco


International Airport. Videotaped Public


Service Announcements, made in conjunc-


tion with the Cinema Department of San


Francisco State University, will put the


voices of ACLU-NC clients on television


Stations around northern California.


Billboards, reminding pedestrians and


commuters that "You Have the Right Not


To Remain Silent," are posted on donated


Gannett Outdoor spaces throughout north-


em California. And interactive posters,


urging people to "Celebrate Freedom of


Speech ... Write Whatever You Want," are


being placed in classrooms, nightclubs and


other venues to encourage students and


visitors to exercise their First Amendment


rights.


These ambitious projects - from


Portraits


The portraits also


were on display in the


lobby of San Francisco


City Hall from January 13


to 24. At the opening


reception, Supervisor


Terence Hallinan, who


sponsored the City Hall


exhibit, spoke about the


from the Struggle


for Civil Liberties


hen photographer Rick Rocamora first realized 1991


was the Bicentennial of the Bill of Rights, a series of


images began to develop in his mind. He didn't think


about the piece of parchment put on tour by Philip Morris, about


court cases referenced in law


libraries, or even about the civil


liberties issues currently under


consideration by the United


States Supreme Court.


He thought about the faces


of the people represented by


those battles. "I thought I could


share images behind some of the


ACLU's cases, so others could


realize that people do make


a dillerence, -_ explains


Rocamora.


His inspiration led to


the creation of "The Human


Face of the Struggle for


Civil Liberties," an exhibit


of 11 portraits of people,


who, with the help of the


ACLU of Northern


California, fought for their


San Francisco City Hall exhibit opening


Simone LeVant Rick Rocamora


Yolanda Cortez Rick Rocamora


ACLU-NC Public Information Director Elaine Elinson,


who coordinated the ACLU-NC's multifaceted projects


to celebrate the Bicentennial of the Bill of Rights, is


pictured above with photographer Rick Rocamora at the


Laura Trent


Raul Ramirez


meaning of civil liberties


in the everyday lives of


San Franciscans. "We so


often talk about civil lib-


erties in the abstract," he


said. "We forget it is


human beings that lose


their civil liberties."


The photographs also


will be exhibited at the North


Terminal of San Francisco


International Airport during


October and November 1992,


where thousands of travelers


daily will have the opportu- Fred Korematsu


nity to see them.


billboards to videos - were coordinated


by ACLU-NC veteran Public Information


Director Elaine Elinson. Elinson's extraor-


dinary effort in pulling together the tal-


ented volunteers, graduate students, and


artists who have contributed to these pro-


jects enables us to celebrate the incredible


diversity and courage of the people who


have led the battle against forces trying to


erode our civil liberties. Her work will


also enable us to reach out to people who


otherwise might remain unaware of their


rights.


By putting a human face to our


Bicentennial project, we hope to inspire


others to stand up for their civil rights.


That next generation of activists may help


guarantee the survival of personal liberty


for another 200 years.


-Dorothy Ehrlich


ACLU-NC Executive Director


constitutional rights. The exhibit premiered at the ACLU-


NC Bill of Rights Day Celebration on December 15.


Rick Rocamora


Rocamora, whose work has appeared frequently in the


ACLU News, as well as in Image magazine and at the Oakland


Museum and the Eye Gallery, captured the diversity and spirit


of the individuals represented by the ACLU-NC. One of his


Subjects is Larry Brinkin, a gay employee of Southern Pacific


Rick Rocamora


who was denied


the company's


standard funeral


leave when _ his


lover dicd.


Brinkin now


works as a dis-


crimination repre-


sentative for the


San Francisco


Human Rights


Commission.


=f photo-


graphed _-_ Larry


Brinkin standing


with a client in


front of the


Federal Building,


under the words


`United States of America,'" says Rocamora. "It provides a


counterpoint - this man is protected by the U.S. Constitution,


but his rights were violated. Now he works to protect the rights


of others."


A portrait of Chiyuka Carlos, one of the young men


denied entrance to Great America amusement park in 1990


because security guards thought their clothes fit a so-called


"gang profile," also is part of the exhibit. Rocamora photo-


continued from page 4


4. jan - feb 1992


aclu news


continued from page 3


graphed Carlos in


his normal week-


day attire, which


includes a dress


shirt, | suspenders


and tie. "You look


at this young man,


a guy who's so


responsible he


works in the


Financial District


during the day and


as a UPS super-


visor at night, and


WL OLA Od


der case resulted in the


longest running press free-


wonder how he dom case on the ACLU-


Larry Brinkin (r.) with client Rick Clark can be stopped NC's docket.


Rick Rocamora from going into an In the future, Roca-


amusement park mora says he hopes to pho-


just because he's wearing another kind of outfit," says


Rocamora. "Anyone can buy that outfit he wore. If he were


white and wearing that outfit, he probably wouldn't be


stopped."


Rocamora used the same sensitivity and insight to por-


tray others involved in ACLU-NC cases. Among the individu-


als photographed were Fred Korematsu, who fought the World


War II internment of Japanese Americans all the way to the


Supreme Court; Yolanda Cortez, a hospital dietitian who


fought the English-Only rule at the University of California at


San Francisco; Simone LeVant, a Stanford diver who chal-


lenged NCAA drug testing of student athletes; Dick Criley, a


longtime free speech advocate; and Raul Ramirez, a reporter


whose San Francisco Examiner story about a Chinatown mur-


tograph more of the coura-


geous people involved in


significant civil rights cases


of the past few decades, and


gather their portraits in a


book that would be made


available to schools. "It


would be testimony to the


fact that one person can


change the law or the ways


laws are enforced,"


Rocamora says. "People


would see it and be inspired


to make a difference."


San Francisco Supervisior Terence Hallinan (speak-


ing) with ACLU-NC Executive Director Dorothy


Ehrlich and photographer Rick Rocamora


announces the opening of the photo exhibit at San


Francisco City Hall on January 13. Laura Trent


atmosphere of mistrust and discrimination. "I didn't know any clause


that said freedom of speech in English Only!" says Cortez, with a


broad smile.


A 30-second video featuring Bettye Davis, a Richmond resi-


rainy black-and-white images of


Gi American families,


Video Visions


forced i desol i t


x mx mx mx 6 x camps eae a Se tee a


television screen as a woman's voice describes the mass relocation of


families under the wartime Executive Order 9066. -


Fred Korematsu appears on the screen, describing why he


refused to be put in the camps. "I was stunned, and couldn't believe


what was happening. Then I realized I was an American, I was born


here. ... 1 was put in jail. I was surprised when the guard came and told


me | had a visitor. I didn't know him, but he introduced himself as Mr.


Ernest Besig of the American Civil Liberties Union."


Photos of young people of Japanese heritage, smiling, saluting


the flag. "The Bill of Rights. Celebrate It. Defend It. Use It," followed


by the ACLU logo, flashes on the screen.


This powerful 60-second video, which premiered at the


December 15 Bill of Rights Day Celebration, will soon fill in the gaps


between sit-coms and advertisements for beauty products, dish soap and


new cars. In January, video portraits of ACLU-NC clients will be sub-


mitted to television stations throughout northern California. They will


air as 15-, 30- and 60-second


dent whose home was invaded by police, has a very different


tone. Davis's description of what happened to her family that day


is punctuated by menacing shots that has the camera closing in on


suburban homes. Her final words are "The thing I'm most angry


about is that this can be done. They can just break into your home at


any time."


Film student Matt Heffelfinger, who produced the Davis video


with Andy Meade, said it was exciting to work on something that


would reach people. "It was a complicated subject to get across in 30


seconds, but I tried to convey that what happened wasn't right, and


that it happens to other people too."


Film students shot videos of a diverse group of individuals


who fought for the many personal freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of


Rights: James Camarillo, who sued for an end to the segregation of


HIV-infected prisoners at the California Medical Facility in


Vacaville; Chiyuka Carlos, one of the young men denied entrance to


Great America theme park


Public. Service Announ-


cements, celebrating the


Bicentennial of the Bill of


Rights.


The videos were made |}


by San Francisco State


University graduate film stu-


dents, guided by Steve Kovacs,


Chair of SF State's Cinema


Department and Elaine Elinson,


ACLU-NC Public Information


Director.


"It's unusual to have


such a collaboration," said


Kovacs, whose screen credits


include producing the 1988 fea-


ture film "68." "Film schools


usually work just with their


own students. For the students


to get this kind of hands-on


training is just great."


The film students bor-


because they fit a so-called


"gang - profile"; Simone


LeVant, a Stanford diver who


refused to submit to NCAA-


mandated drug tests; Larry


Brinkin, a gay employee of


Southern Pacific who was


denied the company's standard


funeral leave when his lover


died; Diane Brown, who


fought to keep prayer out of


her graduation ceremony at


Granada High School in


Livermore; longtime _ free


speech advocate Richard


Criley; and Orlando Gotay, a


gay man forced to resign by


the Navy, which then


demanded he pay back his


Naval Academy tuition.


"These personal por-


traits are real drama about the


rowed equipment from Film


and Video Service to create


high-quality video pieces. Two


professional on-line editors, Jennifer Seaman and Darrell Adams,


helped the students turn their footage into broadcast-quality videos.


Teams of students signed up to film one of the courageous peo-


ple who enlisted the support of the ACLU of Northern California to


defend their rights over the past five decades. In addition to Fred


Korematsu, who was filmed by a team led by Karen Davis, nine other


former and current clients participated in both the video and photogra-


phy projects.


Film students Lidia Szajko and Caitlin Manning produced a


lively spot entitled "Down With English Only," which featured


Yolanda Cortez, a hospital dietitian who fought the "English only" rule


at the University of California at San Francisco. Cortez gathered a few


of her co-workers, who spoke out about how the regulations created an


A hospital worker from UCSF on the "Down with English Only" video.


foundations of democracy,"


says Kovacs


"The founda


tions of democracy are based on freedom of the


individual, and here are these individuals confront-


ing it in their own lives. It's a great exercise for the


students, because they had to figure out how best to


capture what those people are going through, how ,


to show that drama in a single quote."


Daven Gee, a second-year graduate film stu- ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1981.batch ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1982.batch ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1984.batch ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1985.batch ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1986.batch ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1987.batch ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1988.batch ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1989.batch ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1990.batch ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1991.batch ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1992.batch ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log


dent who created the video of Orlando Gotay, said his experience


working on the project was invaluable. "It helped me identify what


I'm really interested in - dealing with real issues and real people,


and letting moving images be their voice. That's what I went to film


school to do, but sometimes you get isolated here on the campus, in


our small art-film kind of world." and


Laura Trent


aclu news


jan - feb 1992 5


Le Le


Bi lho d rl 5 of D rivers in northern California money towar.


" will get a Bill of Rights


Rights message this month. Anselm S


wy = es! le =! = = ated above roadways from San _ courts


Dx 6 mx mx 0x00A7 vx Francisco to Sacramento and from _ respons


Twenty ACLU-NC billboards, situ- The figh


Oakland to San Jose during January and February, need to


carry the message, "You Have the Right Not to


Remain Silent." ject off the drawing boards and onto the streets.


The unprecedented billboard project, combined Through the efforts of Lewis Lillian, Vice-


the talent, generosity and hard work of adiverse group _- President of Gannett Shelter Posters, and Steve


of people. Daniel Clay Russ, the project's copywriter, | Shinn, who dirccts the Public Affairs Department


is a Texan who studied to be a rabbi, has a black belt in


martial arts, and performs as a professional comedian.


Russ was named one of the top ten copywriters in the


country by Adweek magazine.


His passion for, and knowledge about, civil lib-


erties drove him to volunteer his time and energy to the


ACLU. "There is no moral decline in America that we


need fear," says Russ. "What we need to fear is the


decline in education and intelligence in American soci-


ety, because it is almost always associated with repres-


sion."


Russ enlisted Mike Bevil, a young art director


who works with him at the Austin-based advertising


firm of GSD M. They proposed a dynamic series of


billboards, print ads and an interactive poster to be


placed in schools, community centers and other public


places. Among the billboard design proposals were a


"Billboard of Rights," listing the first ten amendments


to the Constitution, and one featuring a copy of the Bill


of Rights under the words "The Protection You Don't


Need to Carry in Your Wallet."


Another of the advertising team's inspirations


was a large-size poster, which is mostly blank, except


for an eye-catching message at the bottom: "Celebrate


Freedom of Speech ... Write Whatever You Want. Pick of Gannett Outdoor Company of Northern


up this pen and express yourself. Then pick up acopy __ California, Gannett donated 20 large billboards,


of the Bill of Rights. Because you can't fight for your _illuminated_-at night, that will be on display during


rights if you don't know what they are." the early months of 1992. They will feature the


words "You Have the Right


Not to Remain Silent."


Other -_Russ/Bevil


designs will be incorporated


into print ads donated by


school and community news-


papers throughout northern


California. And the "Write


What You Want" posters will


ROSCOE


The ACLU-NC billboard, pictured here at 15th Street and South Van Ness in San


Francisco, is up at 20 sites throughout northern California. Jean Field


ae Ge be on display at venues rang-


You Hay eo TL ne Rig ht ing from classrooms to night-


rt "ny 4 : `Clubs. More than 800 high


Not 10 Remal school students had a chance


to express their thoughts on


posters at the Friedman First


Amendment. Education Pro-


ject's. first student conference


in December. The Academy of


Art College put up a dozen in


its hallways for its creative stu-


dent body and several Bay


Jean Field Area high school teachers have


posted them in classrooms.


Accompanying the poster are pens and a box labeled These efforts undoubtedly will reach peo-


"You are free to take one," containing copies of the ple who might otherwise remain unaware of the =


Bill of Rights. role the Bill of Rights plays in their lives. That,


But the costs of a billboard campaign almost say the Strausses, makes educational outreach a


curtailed the project. Despite the generosity of Russ, top priority. "It's good to be at a point in your life-


Bevil and GSD M, and the potential of donated bill- time when you can do something like this," says


board space, production costs for even one or two bill- | Fran Strauss. "The response to our idea from


boards would overwhelm the project's budget. friends and family has been incredible."


At that point, longtime ACLU-NC leader Fran


Strauss, who currently chairs the Development


Committee, came up with one of her generous inspira-


tions. "During a working lunch with Marcia Gallo


[Director of the Friedman First Amendment Education


Project], she mentioned the lack of money for the bill-


board project," says Strauss. "As I drove home, I


started thinking about the big bash I was planning in


honor of my husband Anselm's 75th birthday. It was


going to be quite costly, and I thought why not put the


aclu news


jan - feb 1992


Death Penalty Appeal to High Court: "Efficiency or Justice?"


n January 14, attorneys for Robert 0x00B0


Harris filed a petition in the U.S.


Supreme Court asking the nation's


highest court to review the Ninth Circuit's


refusal to overturn his death sentence.


Attorney Michael Laurence, Director


of the ACLU-NC Death Penalty Project


and one of Harris's defense lawyers, con-


tends that key evidence regarding Harris's


impaired mental condition was never pre-


' sented to the jury in the original trial in


San Diego Superior Court.


"Society cannot and should not close


the federal courthouse doors or permit an


unjust execution because a condemned


inmate lacked the funds to present a


defense," Laurence said.


"Despite his mental disabilities,


because of his poverty Robert Harris never


received a minimally adequate psychiatric


examination at trial," charged Laurence.


"It was not until the defense team, at its


Own expense, brought in competent psy-


chiatric examiners in 1990, that the true


extent of Harris's organic brain disorder


came to light."


Such evidence is vital to proving that


Harris was incapable of committing the


crime for which he is sentenced to death"


- premeditated murder. In 1979, Harris


was convicted of first degree murder and


sentenced to death. But because the jur-


ors did not hear evidence that Harris suf-


fered from organic brain damage and


other disorders stemming from fetal alco-


hol syndrome, traumatic birth, and sys-


tematic brutalization as a child, his


attorneys contend that the death penalty


is unjust.


According to the petition filed in the


U.S. Supreme Court, "The evidence pre-


sented to the district court overwhelm-


ingly proves that the jury was presented


with false information conceming


{Harris's] mental condition. Far from


being a `sociopath,' and someone with


`capacity' to make rational decisions


under stressful situations, under the cir-


cumstances of the crime, [Harris's] men-


tal disabilities prevented him from


harboring the mental state necessary for


death eligibility or the culpability neces-


sary for a jury to return a death sen-


tence."


Harris's petition is supported by affi-


davits from ten mental health experts.


Citing psychiatric and psychological


reports and opinions on Harris from as


early as 1969, and two recent batteries of


neuropsychological tests, | Laurence


argues that Harris was incapable of


understanding or controlling his behav-


ior, both prior to and at the time of the


1978 murders.


"The declarations of mental health


professionals and every competent men-


tal health evaluation performed on


Robert Harris since 1978 support the


petitioner's position that he did not pre-


meditate and deliberate or otherwise


have the required mental state, at the


time of the crime, for the state to obtain a


special circumstance finding or the nec-


essary culpability to persuade a jury that


the death penalty was warranted," stated


Laurence. In August 1991, the Ninth


Circuit by a 2-1 vote refused to consider


the powerful, uncontroverted psychiatric


evidence, and invoked a procedural rule


concluding that Harris should have pre-


sented the evidence earlier.


"The Supreme Court is being asked to


decide whether its newly created rules


restricting death row inmates access to


the federal courts are merely case man-


agement devices or whether they will per-


mit federal courts to ensure justice and


fairness in the application of the death


penalty," Laurence said.


In November, 1991, the full Ninth


Circuit Court of Appeals voted not to


hear Harris's appeal, according to press


reports on a tie vote.


The petition filed in the Supreme


Court argues that Harris's poverty should


not have been used by the Ninth Circuit


to deny him justice and urges the high


court to hear the case to prevent a "funda-


mental miscarriage of justice." Hl


1991 Legislative Review...


continued from page 2


any documents, including those involving


citizen complaints.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


AB 1417 (Friedman) as introduced,


would have allowed all disciplinary actions


involving police officers to be decided


through binding arbitration. The ACLU


argued that disciplinary actions arising out


of citizen complaints should be exempt


because such complaints should be decided


by persons who are familiar with and sen-


Sitive to the needs of the community. The


ACLU was able to obtain amendments pro-


viding an exemption in the bill for citizen


complaints and removed its opposition.


ACLU position: NEUTRAL, AS


AMENDED


Status: Two-year bill


AB 2067 (Floyd) would reinforce the


code of silence surrounding internal police


investigations of misconduct. Among other


things, the bill requires 24-hour notice to


any police officer by his or her superior


before the officer could be questioned con-


cerning any matter under investigation.


The bill's provisions would make it virtu-


ally impossible for police agencies and


Civilian Revicw Boards to adequately


investigate charges of police misconduct.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


AB 183 (Ferguson) would have prohib-


ited the use of pain compliance techniques


on peaceful demonstrators who are not


resisting arrest. Police groups came out in


force in opposition to the bill.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Failed in Assembly Ways and


Means Committee


Reproductive Rights


1991-1992 Budget Act/Medi-Cal


Abortion Funding For the second consec-


utive year the state budget was enacted


without any restrictions on Medi-Cal fund-


ing for abortions. Amendments inserting


restrictive language were attempted by


conservative Republicans on the Assembly


floor but were handily defeated.


SB 1232 (Deddeh), SB 858 (Leonard)


were two anti-choice bills that were


defeated. SB 1232 would have prohibited


anyone form performing an abortion for


the purpose of sex selection; SB 858 would


have placed burdensome reporting require-


ments on health care facilities to keep


records regarding abortions.


ACLU position; OPPOSED


Status: Failed in Senate Health


Committee


First Amendment


SB 341 (Lockyer) requires plaintiffs to


establish that they have a substantial prob-


ability of success before proceeding with


lawsuits against persons for acts in further-


ance of free speech on a public issues. The


bill was intended to provide procedural


protection from SLAPP suits.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Vetoed by the Governor


SB 1115 (Leonard) would specifically


extend First Amendment rights of free


expression to high school and _post-


secondary students in private as well as


public institutions. The bill also clarifies


that schools can impose discipline for acts


of harassment or intimidation that are not


constitutionally protected.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Two-year bill


AB 1934 (Wyman), AB 184


(Ferguson) were efforts to expand censor-


ship. AB 1934 would have substantially


broadened California's definition of


obscenity by applying a community stan-


dards test instead of statewide standards;


AB 184 would have prohibited the selling


of "harmful" printed matter in vending


machines.


ACLU position: OPPOSED BOTH


BILLS; Status: Failed in Assembly


Public Safety Committee


Privacy


ACA 28 (Leslie) sought to amend the


State Constitution by promoting a specific


definition of "family" and "rights" sur-


rounding the family. Sponsored by the


religious right, this bill would have unrav-


eled almost every aspect of family law


including those laws affecting child abuse,


spousal abuse and spousal rape. It would


have infringed upon privacy rights guaran-


tees by the California Constitution on


issues such as parental and spousal consent


for abortions.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Failed in Assembly Judiciary


Committee


AB 167(Burton) would provide legal


recognition of gay and lesbian marriages.


Such recognition recognizes the legal


equality of lesbians and gay men and


extends to its participants the substantial


legal and economic benefits, rights, and


responsibilities of married persons.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Failed in Assembly Judiciary


Committee


SB 937 (Watson) is a broad-ranging


effort to regulate surrogate parenting con-


tracts. The ACLU objects to those provi-


sions of the bill which would terminate


all parental rights of the surrogate mother


as a condition of payment under the sur-


rogacy agreement.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


SB 1154 (Bergeson) would prohibit


all local school employees from being


elected to their local governing boards


unless they resign from their jobs. This


measure deprives Californians of the


right to elect representatives of their


choice and effectively denies school


employees their constitutional right to


run for and serve on their local school


boards.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Signed by the Governor


AB 347 (Eaves) provides that employ-


ers require random drug testing for every


motor carrier driver and applicant driver.


The ACLU remains opposed to drug test-


ing as violative of the Fourth


Amendment and privacy rights.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


Due Process


SB 270 (Kopp) would require tenants to


deposit prospective rent in order to defend


unlawful detainer cases. The bill is


strongly opposed by the ACLU and a long


list of tenant organizations as a fundamen-


tal violation of duc process.


ACLU position: OPPOSE


Status: Two-year bill


AB 2140 (Lee) would reform current


student suspension and expulsion statutes


by providing students stronger due process


protection as well as permitting on-going


educational assignments during a suspen-


sion.


ACLU position: SUPPORT


Status: Two-year bill


SB 665 (Petris), as introduced, would


have substantially curtailed the right of


involuntarily committed mental patients to


refuse powerful psychotropic medication.


The ACLU and patients' rights advocates


were able to obtain amendments which


assured that mental patients could not be


forcibly drugged absent a judicial or quasi-


Judicial finding of incompetency or in


cases of emergency.


ACLU position: NEUTRAL, AS


AMENDED


Status: Signed by the Governor @


aclu news


jan - feb 1992 7


n February 19, 1942, President


Franklin Roosevelet issued


Executive Order 9066, an act that


former Senator Sam Ervin called "the sin-


gle most blatant violation of the


Constitution in our history." Within a


matter of weeks, 110,000 Japanese


Americans were forcibly evacuated from


their West Coast homes and sent to


remote internment centers.


One of those desolate camps was Tule


Lake, a bleak and barren volcanic plateau


Japanese American internment camp


A Meeting at Tule Lake


by Hiroshi Kashiwagi


The busride to Tule Lake


in the night over.dark highways


rain through the flatlands


and snow beyond Weed


up, up to the roof of California


was a movement back in time


back to the years 1943, 44, and 45


when | was 19, 20 and 21.


Being among you


sensing your youthfulness


hearing your strong voices


| search for reasons why


| came after 30 some years.


Tule Lake, Tule Lake - that


was a name | dared not mention


spoken warily, always with


hesitation, never voluntarily.


But you have made it


a common name again


of a small sleepy town


that it was


before we came here


before we were confined here


before it became Tule Lake


Relocation Center


before it became Tule Lake


Segregation Center


for disloyal Japanese Americans.


Yes, it's right that we're here


to see first hand where


18,000 of us lived


for three years or more


to see again


the barbed wire fence


the guard towers, the MPs


the machine guns, bayonets


Bitter Memories


SO0th Anniversary of Internment Order


Just south of the Oregon border. Eighteen


thousand Japanese Americans were


interned there in rows of tarpaper shacks.


In 1943, Tule Lake became a segregation


center: the "troublemakers" - those who


refused to serve in the military or swear


unqualified allegiance to the country


which had interned them were removed


from the other camps and sent there.


The conditions at Tule Lake were


harsher than at any other camp. This led


to strikes, violence and martial law.


and tanks, the barracks


the messhalls, the shower rooms


and latrines.


Yes, it's right to feel


the bitter cold


of the severe winters


the warmth of the pot-bellied


stoves and the dust storms


how can we forget


the sand biting into your skin


filling your eyes and nose and mouth


and ears, graying your hair


in an instant.


Yes, it's right to recall


the directives


of the War Relocation Authority


their threats and lies


the meetings, the strikes


the resistance, arrests


stockades, violence, attacks


murder, derangement


pain, grief, separation


departure, informers


recriminations, disagreements


loyalty, disloyalty


yes yes, no no, no yes


Issei, Nisei, Kibei.


These are words now


but they were lived here.


There were deaths and births


and lovemaking in the firebreak


with the warden's flashlight


shining on you.


Yes, and movies, socials,


dances sports, card games


and religion.


Sewing classes, flower


arrangement, doll making,


Former ACLU-NC Executive Director


Ernie Besig went to Tule Lake to investi-


gate and publicize the conditions of pris-


oners who were kept in isolation in the


stockade.


His visit was unwelcome by the camp


officials who ordered him off the prem-


ises. "A guard made sure we departed,"


recalls Besig. "The guards bade us fare-


well by putting two bags of salt in the gas


tank. The result was a stop and go 400


miles to San Francisco."


wood carving


beauty behind barbed wires.


Recreation was big


it was encouraged.


"Keep `em busy


keep `em occupied


keep 'em sane,


for heaven's sake!"


But a Chronicle reporter


observed: "there are


18,000 mental patients living


in confinement at Tule Lake."


So it is right that we are here


itis right that | remember


and tell it.


| wish | could share


the feeling | have now


with the Issei and Nisei


they who lived here


they who do not speak of it


who pass it off


as a good time experience.


Whatever we did here


. the commitments we made


loyal or disloyal


compliance or resistance


yes or no


it was right!


Because the young people


make it so


because they seek the history


from those of us who lived it.


So we must remember


and tell it.


we must acknowledge it


and tell it.


So we are here


the Abalone Mountain


the Castle Rock


After half a century, a belated official


apology from the U.S. government, and


monetary compensation for the internces,


pilgrimages are made to Tule Lake to


remind the younger generations of that


bleak chapter of U.S. history.


In honor of the endurance and commit-


ment of the internees, the ACLU News is


proud to publish this poem by Hiroshi


Kashiwagi, poct, actor and former Tule


Lake internee.


Courtesy JACL


the dry lake bed


where tules still grow.


But the barracks


where are the barracks?


And where Apt. 40 05 D?


home once long ago


sold? demolished? gone.


Little remains


except what's trapped


in our heads


far back somewhere.


I'm glad | made this trip.


Somehow | feel


a meeting of youths,


your youth, your energy


your enthusiasm, your


sense of justice


with the youth that | was


idealistic, intense, angry.


It's a happy meeting


it is even better


that | can stand aside


after 30 odd years


and see it, this meeting


to meet, to share, to learn


to struggle, to continue.


| sense an immense feeling


of continuity


with


you - all of you.


Yes. It's right, it's right


and I'm glad | came


back to Tule Lake


with you.


Written and read at Tule Lake,


California; April 19, 1975


aclu news


nov 1991


Obituaries


The ACLU-NC mourns the deaths of


four outstanding civil liberties activists.


Dom Sallitto


Dom Sallitto, who died in December,


was a founding member of the ACLU-NC


Santa Clara Chapter more than a quarter


century ago, but that was not his first


brush with the ACLU. When Sallitto was


arrested and jailed during the 1934


General Strike in San Francisco and


threatened with deportation to his native


Italy, the ACLU came to his defense and


remained a member of his defense com-


mittee until his case was dismissed in


1938. A dues-paying member of the


ACLU since 1940, Sallitto set up the


chapter from an office in San Jose State


University at the urging of former


Executive Director Ernie Besig who had


helped fight his deportation.


Sallitto served on the Chapter Board


for many years and chaired the Students


Rights and Church/State Committees. He


made many appearances before the Los


Gatos School Board, convincing them that


Christmas pageants and other religious


events had no place in the public school


system.


Dom and his wife Aurora were the


recipients of the Lola Hanzel Courageous


Advocacy Award, given to outstanding


ACLU-NC volunteers, in 1985.


According to former Chapter chair Vic


Ulmer, the Sallittos were the "backbone of


the chapter - from hosting ACLU events,


to mailing the chapter newsletter out from


their living room, to advocating on civil


liberties issues before government bod-


ies." a


Monterey Chapter leader Dick Criley


said of Dom, "He was one of those incred-


ible Italian anarchists - principled to the


nth degree!"


Jane Scribner


Jane Scribner, a tireless and devoted


ACLU-NC volunteer for more than a dec-


ade, died of cancer in December. "We at


the ACLU-NC are so lucky that Jane


came to volunteer with us," said ACLU-


NC Executive Director Dorothy Ehrlich.


"Not only was she incredibly bright, hard-


working and good humored - her com-


mitment inspired many others -


volunteers and staff alike - to increase


their efforts for the organization!"


Scribner was born in San Francisco


and, despite facing severe quotas on


women entering college in the 1930's,


attended Radcliffe in Cambridge,


Massachusetts. As a chemistry major, she


had to "cross the quad" and take chemis-


try courses with the illustrious professors


who taught the men at Harvard. After


graduation, she returned to the Bay Area


and worked as a lab assistant at U.C.


Berkeley. Undaunted by the many barriers


that faced women in scientific careers,


Scribner went on to eam her PhD in


microbiology at UC Berkeley.


She taught bacteriology at San


Francisco City College, but her teaching


career was interrupted when Scribner


refused to sign the McCarthy-era loyalty


oath required by the Levering Act. The


California Supreme Court later threw out


the Act as unconstitutional, but Scribner


- because she had resigned in opposition


to the oath - did not get her teaching


position back. Jobless, she went to secre-


tarial school, learned shorthand and typ-


ing, and went to work at Mt. Zion


Hospital in the pathology department and


later at UCSF in the ophthalmolog


department.


After she retired from UCSF in the


early 1970's, Scribner threw herself into


volunteer work at the ACLU-NC. A


devoted worker, Scribner worked in every


department, from the Complaint Desk to


the Public Information Department, taking


on any kind of task that came her way.


She counseled callers in need of assis-


tance, stuffed envelopes, staffed informa-


tion tables, and helped in fundraising


campaigns. "She was willing to do any-


thing for the organization she believed


in," said her longtime companion and fel-


low ACLU volunteer George Hutchins.


Scribner also helped feed the homeless


at St. Anthony's, and supported a wide


variety of peace, justice and environmen-


tal organizations ranging from the


American Friends Service Committee to


KPFA. Scribner bequeathed a generous


donation to the ACLU-NC, as well as to


the other groups she cared so deeply


about.


Jerry Berg


Gay rights leader, attorney and former


ACLU-NC officer Jerry Berg died in


September of AIDS at the age of 54. Berg


was the Vice-Chair of the Board of


Directors of the ACLU-NC in the 1970's;


he also chaired the successful 1978 cam-


paign to fight the Briggs initiative, a state "


ballot measure which would have man-


dated the firing of gay public school


feachers.


A graduate of Stanford and Stanford


Law School, Berg was the first national


co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign


Fund, a founder of the Lesbian/Gay


_ Freedom Marching Band and a leader of


the public interest legal organization Gay


Rights Advocates.


ACLU-NC volunteer James Hormel, a


longtime friend of Berg, said, "He was a


unique individual who touched enormous


numbers of people during his lifetime.


The example of his dedication to public


service is a legacy to all of us."


Milen Dempster


Veteran peace and civil liberties acti-


vist Milen Dempster died on December 12


at the age of 91 in Mill Valley. In 1955,


Dempster, along with Sali Lieberman and


Vera Schultz founded the first chapter of


the ACLU-NC - the Marin County


Chapter - with encouragement from


then-Executive Director Emie Besig.


Dempster was the first recipient of the


Chapter's Benjamin Dreyfus Civil


Liberties Award and received a public


thank-you for his efforts from


Congresswoman Barbara Boxer. He was


also made a "life member" of the Marin


Chapter board, an honor bestowed on peo-


ple who have made an outstanding contri-


bution to civil liberties as a board


member.


A leader of the peace movement,


Dempster helped found the anti-nuclear


group Marin SANE/Freeze. Dempster's


half century of activism earned him the


nickname "Mr. Peace."


A native San Franciscan, Dempster


would regale his friends with stories about


surviving the 1906 earthquake. A


Unitarian minister, and a manager of


migrant worker camps in California and


refugee camps in Europe after World War


II, Dempster was the Socialist candidate.


for governor in 1934.


A man of boundless energy, dogged


determination and a lifelong enthusiasm


for learning, Dempster became a cham-


pion of editorial page letter writing.


Marin Chapter Board member Eve Citrin


recalled that the only time he didn't come


to ACLU meetings was when he was


working for the anti-nuclear cause. ``He'd


show up with a whole bunch of placards


about nuclear disasters and explain that he


had to dedicate attention to eradicating


nuclear bombs - otherwise there would


be no one left to fight for civil liberties.


"He dedicated his life to the dual


causes of peace and justice and he never


stopped working for either one - he


began fighting for civil liberties long ~


before any of us were bom," Citrin added.


A memorial for "Mr. Peace" was held


on January 11 at the Marin Fellowship of


Unitarians in Terra Linda. Milen


Dempster's family requests donations in


his memory be made to the ACLU-NC,


Marin SANE/Freeze, Greenpeace and the


Sierra Club.


Field Program


Monthly Meetings


Chapter Meetings


(Chapter meetings are open to all inter-


ested members. Contact the chapter


activist listed for your area.)


B-A-R-K (Berkeley-Albany-Richmond-


Kensington) Chapter Meeting:


(Usually fourth Thursday) Meet on


Thursday, February 27 and March 26.


Volunteers needed for the chapter


hotline - call Florence Piliavin at


510/848-5195 for further details. For


more information, time and address of


meetings, contact Julie Houk, 510/848-


4752.


Earl Warren (Oakland/Alameda County)


Chapter Meeting: (Usually second


Wednesday) Meet on Wednesday,


February 12 and March 11. The Earl


Warren Chapter is sponsoring a high


school essay contest. Chapter Hotline,


510/534-ACLU is now available 24


hours. For time and address of meet-


ings, please call Irv Kermish, 510/836-


4036 or Abe Feinberg, 510/451-1122.


Fresno Chapter Meeting: (Usually


third Monday) Meet on Monday,


February 17 and March 16 at 6:30 PM


at San Joaquin Law School. New mem-


bers always welcome! For more infor-


mation, call Nadya Coleman at 209/


229-7178 (days) or A.J. Kruth at 209/


432-1483 (evenings).


Lesbian and Gay Rights Chapter


Meeting: (Usually first Thursday) Meet


on Thursday, February 6 and March 5 at


the ACLU Office, 1663 Mission, #460,


San Francisco at 7:00 PM. February 6


mailing party will start at 5:30 PM For


more information, contact Teresa


Friend, 510/272-9700.


Marin County Chapter Meeting:


(Third Monday) Meet Monday,


February 17 and March 16 at 7:30 PM,


Westamerica Bank, East Blithedale and ~


Sunnyside Avenues, Mill Valley. For


more information, contact Harvey


Dinerstein, 415/381-6129.


Mid-Peninsula (Palo Alto area)


Chapter Meeting: (Usually fourth


Thursday) Meet Thursday, February 27


and March 26 at 7:30 PM at the


California Federal Bank, El Camino


Real, Palo Alto. New members wel-


come! For more information, contact


Harry Anisgard, 415/856-9186 or call


the Chapter Hotline at 415/328-0732.


Monterey County Chapter Meeting:


(Usually first Tuesday) Meet on


Tuesday, February 4 and March 3 at


7:30 PM at the Monterey Library,


Community Room, Pacific and Madison


Streets, Monterey. For more informa-


tion, contact Richard Criley, 408/624-


762.


Mt. Diablo (Contra Costa County)


Chapter Meeting: (Usually fourth


Thursday) No meeting in February.


Meeting on Thursday, March 26 at 7:30


PM. For more information, contact


Mildred Starkie, 415/934-0557.


North Peninsula (San Mateo area)


Chapter- Meeting: (Usually third


Monday) Meet on Monday, February 17


and March 16 at 7:30 PM at the offices


of Planned Parenthood, 2211 Palm


Avenue, San Mateo. Note: The North


Pen Chapter has a new Hotline num-


ber: 579-1789. For more information,


contact Emily Skolnick at 340-9834.


North Valley (Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehema,


and Trinity Counties) Chapter


Meeting: (Usually third Wednesday)


Meet on Wednesday, February 19 at


6:30 PM at Harry's Restaurant,


Redding. Date for March meeting to be


announced. For more information con-


tact interim Chairperson Tillie Smith at


916/549-3998.


Redwood (Humboldt County) Chapter


Meeting: (Usually third Monday) The


new Redwood Chapter will meet on


Monday, March 16 at Humboldt State


University, Science B Building, Room


135 at 7:15 PM. Call for information on


February meeting or other information


contact Christina Huskey at 707/445-


7034,


Sacramento Valley Chapter Meeting:


(Usually second Wednesday) Meet on


Wednesday, February 12 and March 11


at 7:00 PM at Hearing Room 1,


Sacramento County Offices, 700 H


Street. Meeting on April 8 will be a


panel discussion on The Right To


Privacy. For more information, contact


Ruth Ordas, 916/488-9956


San Francisco Chapter Meeting:


(Usually third Monday) Meeting on


Monday, February 24 and March 16 at


7:00PM. at ACLU office, 1663


Mission, 460, San Francisco. For more


information, call the Chapter


Information Line at 415/979-6699.


Santa Clara Valley Chapter Meeting:


(Usually first Tuesday) Meet on


Tuesday, February 4 and March 3 at


7:00 PM at the Community Bank


Building, 3rd Floor Conference Room,


comer of Market/St. John Streets, San


Jose. Contact John Cox 408/226-7421,


for further information.


Santa Cruz County Chapter Meeting:


(Usually third Tuesday) Meet on


Tuesday, February 18 and March 17.


Chapter will continue to work on com-


bating Hate Crimes. Contact Keith


Lesar, 408/688-1666, for further infor-


mation.


Sonoma County Chapter Meeting:


(Third Thursday of the month) Meet


Thursday, February 20 and March 19 at


7:30 Pm at the Peace and Justice


Center, 540 Pacific Avenue, Santa


Rosa. All members welcome. Contact


Len Bronstein, at 707/527-9018 for fur-


ther information. ~


Yolo County Chapter Meeting: (Third


Thursday of the month) Meet on


Thursday, February 20 and March 19.


For more information, contact Alan


Brownstein at 916/752-2586.


Field Action Meetings


(All meetings except those noted will be


held at the ACLU-NC Office, 1663


Mission Street, Suite 460, San


Francisco.) :


Student Outreach Committee:(Usually


third Saturday) Meet on Saturday,


February 15, March 14 and March 21.


Contact Marcia Gallo, at ACLU-NC


415/621-2493, for more information.


Civil Rights Committee:


(Fourth Saturday) Meeting on Saturday,


February 22 and March 28 from 10:00


AM to 11:30 AM. RSVP to Nancy Otto


at ACLU-NC 415/621-2493.


First Amendment Committee:


(Fourth Saturday) Meeting on Saturday,


February 22 and March 28 from 12:00


PM to 1:30 PM. RSVP to Nancy Otto at


ACLU-NC 415/621-2493.


Pro-Choice Action Campaign:


Contact Nancy Otto at the ACLU-NC


415/621-2493.


Death Penalty Action Campaign


Contact Nancy Otto at the ACLU-NC


415/621-2493.


Page: of 8