vol. 60, no. 2

Primary tabs

Wotume LX


MarcH/APRIL 1996


NEWSPAPER OF THE AMERICAN Givwil LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN GALIFORNIA


aclu news.


Non-Profit


Organization


US Postage


PAID


Permit No. 4424


San Francisco, CA


Ninth Circuit Upholds Ban on Gas Chamber


66 T's is the death knell for lethal


gas executions in this country,"


said attorney Michael


Laurence, former Director of the ACLU-


NC Death Penalty Project.


Laurence was responding to the 3-0


decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of


Appeals on February 21 upholding the


landmark ban on San Quentin's gas cham-


ber. The ruling affirmed the 1994 decision


by U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn Hall


Patel that the gas chamber is "cruel and


unusual punishment" and therefore vio-


lates the U.S. Constitution.


"The District Court's findings of


extreme pain, the length of time this


extreme pain lasts, and the substantial


risk that inmates will suffer this extreme


pain for several minutes requires the con-


clusion that execution by lethal gas is cru-


el and unusual,' wrote Judge Harry.


Pregerson in the 20-page opinion. He was


joined by Judges Melvin Brunetti and


Thomas Nelson.


This is the highest court in the coun-


try to determine that the gas chamber -


or any method of state execution - is


cruel and unusual punishment. The rul-


ing applies to all nine states in the Ninth


Circuit's jurisdiction, one of which -


Arizona - is one of the handful of states


that still allows the gas chamber as a


method of execution.


According to Laurence, who called


the gas chamber a "barbaric form of tor-


ture," the decision will have an effect


nationwide. Although the Attorney


General has 90 days to appeal to the U.S.


Supreme Court, the San Francisco


Chronicle reported that Governor Pete


Wilson was "incensed" by the ruling.


California has employed the gas


chamber to execute 196 prisoners since


1987. In 1992, the state Legislature passed | provided that the gas chamber would be |


a law allowing the state to kill by lethal


injection; the law went into effect on


January 1, 1998. However, the legislation


used unless the condemned prisoner elect-


ed to be executed by lethal injection.


In addition to Laurence, cooperating


attorney Warren George of McCutchen,


Doyle, Brown and Enersen is representing


the Death Row inmates in this suit which


was originally filed in April 1992. @


ver 300 abolitionists gathered outside the gates of San


Quentin Prison on the night of February 22 for a vigil in


protest of the state execution of William Bonin, the first con-


demned prisoner in California to die by lethal injection. Bonin


was executed a few minutes after midnight on February 23.


The death penalty opponents were heartened by the


words of Mike Farrell, President of Death Penalty Focus, Derrel


Myers, a San Francisco father whose 23-year old son was mur-


- ATTHE GATES OF SAN QUE


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


dered in January, Magdaleno Rose-Avila of the Cesar Chavez


Institute and others who spoke out against state killing in the


shadow of the death house. Holding candles and anti-capital


punishment placards, the protestors' songs, prayers and silence


were punctuated by harsh, insulting jeers from a handful of


death penalty supporters.


Staff attorney Kelli Evans (above) was part of the ACLU-NC


staff and chapter activist contingent at the midnight vigil. Hl


TAN MARTIN


SOSSSHSSHSSSHSHSHSHSOSSHSHSHRSHSHOHSHSHSHHHSSHSHSHHHSSSHHSHSHSSHSHSSHSHSHSHSHHHHHOSHEHHFTHOHHSHHHHHSOHSEHOHSSSHSSESSHGESHEH8S8THH8H8ESEH8EH8EHSHEHEHEH8EH8E8TOSGH8TSES8H8SSG8EH82EH88OSEHS EO


Groups Mobilize


to Defeat CCRI


the Anti-Affirmative Action


Initiative


ours after the sponsors of the


H deceptively-titled California Civil


Rights Initiative (CCRI) turned in


their signatures to qualify for the


November 1996 ballot on February 21, a


broad coalition of affirmative action sup-


porters announced their plans to defeat


the measure at the polls.


At a press conference at the ACLU-NC


office, representatives of more than twenty


state and local civil rights, women's and


labor organizations - from the League of


Women Voters to the NAACP to the


California Business Council for Equal


Opportunity - pledged to put their mus-


cle behind a statewide campaign to stop


the initiative.


Members of the


local coalition,


Californians for Affirmative Action, were


joined by Ralph Neas of the National


Leadership Conference on Civil Rights who


pledged national support to defeat the bal-


lot measure.


"This is a fight for the hearts and soul


of what people in California stand for," said


Neas whose organization is the oldest and


largest civil rights coalition in the country.


"Our 185 organizations represent more


than 65 million Americans who care about


equal opportunity," said Neas, "and we all


understand that what happens here in


California will have a profound effect on


the future of affirmative action programs


nationwide."


Californians for Affirmative Action


chair Eva Paterson underscored the grow-


ing opposition from women, labor, and


Continued on page 2


ACLU-NE Annual Reporte


Innocent Man Wins Settlement for 3-Month Jailing


record, he was bound over for trial in


ed Nguyen, a self-employed contrac- | bery. Although he had no arrest or criminal


tor in San Jose, who was arrested |


and jailed for three months solely


because his photograph found its way into


the now-defunct "Asian Mug Book" once


maintained by the San Jose Police


Department, was vindicated on January 23


when the San Jose City Council voted to


award him $150,000 in damages.


The sum was part of a settlement in


Nguyen v. San Jose, the ACLU-NC lawsuit


filed on behalf of Nguyen in March 1992 in


Santa Clara County Superior Court, charg-


ing that officers of the San Jose Police


Department violated his rights to privacy,


due process and equal protection.


Nguyen was represented by ACLU-NC


cooperating attorneys Edward Davis and


Sharon Kirsch of the San Jose office of


Pillsbury, Madison and Sutro; ACLU-NC


Managing Attorney Alan Schlosser and


Richard Konda of the Asian Law Alliance.


"This settlement is extremely significant


for two reasons," said attorney Davis. "First,


it provides a small measure of compensa-


tion for Ted Nguyen who spent 90 days in jail


for a crime he didn't commit because of a


police department practice based on race.


"In addition, it sends a warning to all


other law enforcement agencies that if


they are going to use race-based photo ID


books - they could very well have prob-


lems," Davis added.


"This was discrimination," said Nguyen,


adding that he is happy with the settle-


ment but that he "would feel better about


justice" if they did not "jail and prosecute


an innocent man based on race."


400 VIETNAMESE MEN


The mugbook contained over 400 pic-


tures of Asian men between the ages of 18


and 25, 95% of them Vietnamese, many of


whom had never been arrested or convict-


ed of a crime. It had been used by the San


Jose Police Department since 1989.


Nguyen's picture was in the book


because in the spring of 1990, he drove up


to a friend's house where San Jose police


were conducting a narcotics investigation.


After the police confronted him, he was


detained for questioning and released


without charges. After being questioned,


Nguyen's photo was taken and, without his


knowledge, placed in the Asian Mug Book.


A year later, the police were investigat-


ing a robbery allegedly committed by a


group of Vietnamese men. The victim was


shown the Asian Mug Book and she identi-


fied two photos as being the robbers, one of


which was the photo of Nguyen. The police


did not arrange a line-up to require the vic-


tim to identify Nguyen in person. Rather,


based solely on the identification from the


photograph, Nguyen was arrested, booked


and charged with first degree armed rob-


(c)8208 CCO8SSOHSOCOHSEHESHSSEOH8SEE8O


Board Election...


Continued from page |


held on September 12, 1996.] Members of


the Board may propose additional nomina-


tions. Ifno additional nominations are pro-


posed by Board members, the Board, by a


majority of those present and voting, shall


adopt the Nominating Committee's report.


If additional nominations are proposed, the


Board shall, by written ballot, elect a slate


of nominees with each member being enti-


tled to cast a number of votes equal to the


vacancies to be filled; the Board slate of


nominees shall be those persons, equal in


number to the vacancies to be filled, who


have received the greatest number of votes.


The list of nominees to be placed before the


membership of the Union for election shall


be those person nominated by the Board as


herein provided, together with those per-


Superior Court; bail was set at $500,000.


CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES


After being jailed for over 90 days, Nguyen


was eventually acquitted by a jury of all


charges. In addition to his time in jail and


the thousands of dollars in legal fees, his


business suffered as a result of his arrest


and incarceration.


Groups Mobilize Against CCRI...


Continued from page |


minority voters to the initiative which, she


charged, "would turn back the clock on


equal opportunity in the state of


California."


Ralph Neas (center) of the National Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, joins ACLU-


NC Executive Director Dorothy Ehrlich (seated left), Californians for Affirmative Action


Chair Eva Paterson (seated right) and representatives of more than twenty women s


and civil rights groups at a press conference to launch the campaign to defeat CCRI.


ACLU-NC staff attorney Schlosser not-


ed, "Placing an individual's photo in a mug


book that is shown to crime victims expos-


es that individual to the danger of being


misidentified and prosecuted for a crime


he never committed. That this is not just a


theoretical danger is vividly demonstrated


by this case - for that is exactly what hap-


pened to Ted Nguyen.


"The mug book used by San Jose police


exposed only Asians to this dangerous


We urge all ACLU-NC members to get


involved in the campaign to stop CCRI at


the polls. To find out what you can do, call


your local Chapter (see Field Calendar on


p. 4 for contact numbers), or send in the


coupon below.


Be Prepared...


to Fight for


Affirmative


Action


READ UP -


New Brochure


on Affirmative


Action


The new ACLU brochure Affirmative


Action California: Why It Is Still Necessary, a


collaborative publication of the state's three


ACLU atfiliates, is full of useful facts on the


history and impact of affirmative action as


well as powerful arguments in defense of


the programs.


The 6-page pamphlet is an informative,


easy-to-use tool for speakers and organiz-


ers. More than 5,000 copies have already


been distributed around the state.


To order your copy, send in the coupon


below.


AND SIGN uP!


I Support Affirmative Action


O Keep me posted on ACLU activities


Send me a copy of Affirmative Action California


NAME


ADDRESS


City STATE Zip


PHONE (DAYS) (EVES),


FAX E-MAat


PLEASE FILL OUT AND RETURN TO.


FIELD DEPARTMENT, ACLU-NC, 1663 Mission STREET, #460, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103.


sons nominated by petition as hereafter


provided in Section 4.


Article VII, Section 4: Any fifteen or


more members of the Union in good stand-


ing may themselves submit a nomination to


be included among those voted upon by the


general membership by submitting a writ-


ten petition to the Board not later than


twenty days after the adoption by the Board


of the slate of Board nominees. No member


of the Union may sign more than one such


petition, and each such nomination shall be


accompanied by a summary of qualifica-


tions and the written consent of the nomi-


nee. @


Covarrubiaz


practice," Schlosser explained. "If a non-


Asian had been in the car with Ted when he


was stopped, that person would never had


his photo placed in the book, and exposed


to the risk of being falsely accused.


Furthermore this policy was even more


questionable because photos were includ-


ed of individuals who, like Ted Nguyen, had


not been convicted or even arrested for a


criminal offense.


"Finally there were no due process safe-


guards - persons were not informed that


their photos were in the book and there


was no policy limiting the amount of time


that their photo would stay there. Thus,


Nguyen's photo was placed in the book


without his knowledge or consent, and it


remained there for more than a year when


he was misidentified by the robbery victim.


Only then did Mr. Nguyen even learn that


his photo was part of the Asian mug book,"


Schlosser added. -


MUGBOOK SCRAPPED


In response to what happened to Nguyen,


community and civil rights groups demand-


ed that the Asian mugbook be scrapped. In


February 1992, Police Chief Lou


announced that the


Department would stop using the book and


return all photographs to the computerized


photo file bank.


"Although the Department is no longer


using the Asian mug book, unfortunately


this type of police practice is not limited to


San Jose," Schlosser said. "The ACLU has


investigated a number of instances where,


in the name of combatting gang activities, -


police detain and photograph minority


youth based solely on their ethnicity or


manner of dress. Such practices raise seri-


ous constitutional issues, as well as the


specter of innocent young people ending


up in police files without any objective evi-


dence linking them to criminal activity."


Schlosser noted the ACLU case of


Pham v. City of Garden Grove, where two


Vietnamese high school honor students


were detained and photographed for police


gang files solely on the basis of their race.


The two teenage girls in the Orange


County community were not acting illegally -


nor had they ever been arrested or charged


with any crimes. They were not formally


charged, but their photographs were


entered into a law enforcement computer


gang database - leading to the police


detention of one of the girls for a second


time. That case was settled in U.S. District


Court on February 9, with the Garden


Grove Police Department agreeing to


revise a number of policies and procedures,


including those that govern field inter-


views, photographs and the criteria for


labeling individuals as gang members.


"The tragic ordeal of Ted Nguyen


underscores the dangers of police depart-


ments using race, `gang' profiles or other


loose criteria to put photographs of inno-


cent people in their files," concluded attor-


ney Ed Davis. "This practice simply can't be


tolerated."


ACLU News = Marcn/Apri: 1996 = Pace 2


Wilson, UC Regents


Violate Open


Meetings Law


ACLU affiliates of Southern and


Northern California, filed suit on


February 16, charging that Governor Pete


Wilson and a quorum of the U.C. Board of


Regents violated the Bagley-Keene Open


Meetings Act by secretly committing to


eliminate affirmative action in the


University of California prior to their July


20, 1995 public session. The Daily Nexus v.


UC Regents, filed in San Francisco


Superior Court, maintains that the


Regents' decision abolishing affirmative


action is therefore, "null and void."


Tim Molloy, campus reporter for the


Daily Nexus, the U.C. Santa Barbara stu-


dent newspaper, was informed that Wilson


and between 10 to 15 of the Regents partic-


ipated in a series of private one-on-one


conversations regarding affirmative action


in U.C. admissions and hiring before the


July 20 public hearing. Based on this infor-


mation, Molloy used the California Public


Records Act to request phone numbers


called by Governor Wilson from July 10,


1995, through July 19, 1995.


S tudent reporters, represented by the


"I have tried through nearly thirty _


Public Records Act requests to gather


information that would help answer the


question of whether the Board violated the


Bagley-Keene Act," explained Molloy at a


San Francisco press conference following


the filing of the suit. "But hesitance on the


part of the Governor's Office to release


records I believe should be public, as well


as incongruities in statements from the


Governor's Office, have led me to believe


that this case is the last possible means by


which we can determine what actually led


to the votes.


To date, the newspaper has not


received any of the requested records.


Editor-in-chief Suzanne Garner maintains


that the Daily Nexus is not taking a posi-


tion on affirmative action at the University


but is challenging the Regents' decision


because the state officials violated their


obligation to deliberate in public.


"There is simply no place for backroom


politics in public decision-making.


Officials must be held accountable for


their actions and this becomes impossible


when they deliberate behind closed doors.


You can't get around the public meetings


law by forming a united front through tele-


phone calls before voting," explained


ACLU-NC staff attorney Ed Chen.


In a 1985 case, the California Court of


Appeal ruled that a series of telephone


calls to line up votes in a Stockton redevel-


. opment agency violated the local open


meeting law. The state law contains the


same language as that local version.


The Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act


specifically requires the U.C. Regents'


meetings to be conducted in public and


prohibits a quorum or majority from evad-


ing this requirement by forming a "collec-


tive commitment" to take a particular


action outside a public meeting.


The plaintiffs may seek a court order


blocking implementation of the Regents'


decision pending a court ruling. If the


court declares the Regents' vote void, the


Regents would have to reconsider their


motions to abolish affirmative action at


the University.


The Daily Nexus is represented by


ACLU-SC attorneys Dan Tokaji and Mark


Rosenbaum; ACLU-NC staff attorney Ed


Chen, First Amendment Project attorneys


James Wheaton and Elizabeth Pritzker,


Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights attor-


neys Eva Paterson and Nancy Stuart, Equal


Rights Advocates attorney Judith E. Kurtz,


and Karl Manheim of Loyola Law School.


Register to Vote Now,


at a DMV Near You


By MariA ARCHULETA


egistering to vote has just become


R as simple as walking into the near-


est DMV. On January 22, in the suit


Voting Rights Coalition v. Wilson, the U.S.


Supreme Court denied Governor Pete


Wilson's petition to stop the implementa-


tion of the National Voter Registration Act


(NVRA), the "motor voter" law, which allows


citizens to register to vote by mail and in


person at DMV offices, welfare depart-


ments and other government agencies.


On December 15, 1994 a coalition of


voting rights groups, represented by the


ACLU affiliates of Northern and Southern


California and other public interest


lawyers, filed suit to force implementation


of the measure enacted by Congress in


1998 to address the problem that 37% of


the country's eligible electorate are not


registered to vote. Despite the fact that


California had the lowest rate of registered


voters in the nation, Wilson refused to put


the law into effect. On January 23, 1995, in


a separate suit, the U.S. Department of


Justice also sued California for its failure to


comply. In March, 1995, a U.S District Court


found the "motor voter" law to be constitu-


tional and ordered the state to implement


the law by mid-June; Wilson appealed. In


July, 1995 the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of


Appeals rejected Wilson's appeal, and the


Governor unsuccessfully appealed once


more to the U.S. Supreme Court.


"The door to the voting booth just


opened a lot wider, and Governor Wilson is


not in the way," said Alan Schlosser,


Managing Attorney of the ACLU of


Northern California. "Failure to imple-


ment this law - which was passed to help


close the gap between minority and white


voter registration rates - would have a


particularly harmful effect on minority


communities and the poor," Schlosser


added.


In all seven states (California, Illinois,


Kansas, Michigan, Pennsylvania, South


Carolina, Virginia) where governors had to


be sued to implement the motor voter law,


courts have upheld the measure as consti-


tutional. In California, more than 100,000


people have been registering to vote each


month since the state was forced to imple-


ment the measure last June.


The voting rights coalition was repre-


sented by Schlosser, Mark Rosenbaum and


Dan Tokaji of the ACLU of Southern


California, Lawyers' Committee for Civil


-Rights Associate Director Robert Rubin,


the Asian Law Caucus and other public


interest legal organizations. @


ACLU News = Marcn/Aprit 1996 = Pace 3 :


es)


Heisler Moot Court


Another Successful Tradition for


Monterey Segre


BY LisA MALDONADO


unique program sponsored by the


Aimer County Chapter is ensur-


ing that aspiring lawyers learn how


to advocate for civil liberties even before


they graduate law school.


In 1986, in memory of renowned attor-


ney Francis Heisler, a former Chapter


Board member who died in 1984, the


Chapter established the Heisler Moot


Court at the Monterey College of Law.


Heisler, who taught at the college and


donated his extensive law library to the


school after his retirement, was honored


during his lifetime by both the Chapter and


the affiliate for his outstanding contribu-


tions to civil liberties.


The Heisler Moot Court, which has


become an institution in Monterey County,


is a competition in oral advocacy for law


.students who tackle major law and social


policy issues - ranging from pornography


and the rights of women, to drug testing, to


religion in the schools. Students present


their arguments to a distinguished panel of


judges who question and challenge the stu-


dents on their legal knowledge before a


public audience. The biannual program


also includes a civil liberties address by a


Francis Heisler at the 1977 ACLU-NC


Bill of Rights Day Celebration.


Monterey Chapter activist.


This year the Heisler Moot Court


focused on the timely issue of governmental


regulation of free speech on the internet.


"Our sixth biannual Heisler Moot Court


marks yet another successful result of our


Chapter's efforts to establish ourselves as


an integral presence in the Monterey


County community," said Chapter Chair


Catherine Stoner.


For Monterey Chapter Executive Direc-


ACLIU-NC S@eNOMA CHAPTER


INVITES YOU


FEATURING


former U.S. Representative


DAN HAMBURG


n "Civil Liberties in Two Societies:


U.S. and South Africa"


and


Founder of the UC Berkeley Free


Speech Movement


MArio SAVIO


on "Diversity and Affirmative Action


On and Off Campus"


Chapter Meetings


(Chapter meetings are open to all interested mem-


bers. Contact the Chapter activist listed for your


area.)


B-A-R-K (BERKELEY-ALBANY-RICHMOND-KENSING-


TON) Chapter Meeting: (Usually fourth Thursday)


Volunteers needed for the chapter hotline - call


Tom Sarbaugh at 510/526-6376 for further


details. For more information, time and address of


meetings, contact Jim Chanin at 510/848-4752 or


Rachel Richman at 510/540-5507.


EARL WARREN (OAKLAND/ALAMEDA COUNTY)


CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually first Wednesday) New


meeting location Meet at 7:30 PM at Claremont


House/Activity Room, 4500 Gilbert Street,


Oakland (nr. Rockridge Shopping Center). We


encourage new members to join us as we work on


our high school essay contest, the Oakland civil-


ian review board, affirmative action, and ending


drug prohibition. For more information, call


David Gassman at 510/835-2334.


FRESNO CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually second


Wednesday) For information on date and time of


meetings, call Nadya Coleman at 209/229-7178.


TO ATTEND OUR


For more information, contact Steve Thornton (707) 544-8115


Friday, March 29


No Host Bar and Music


5:30 PM


Dinner 7 pm


Sebastopol Veterans


Memorial Building


$15 tickets before March 15 / $10


low income or kids under 16


after March 15: $20/$15


LESBIAN AND GAY RIGHTS CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually


first Thursday) ACLU-NC office, 1663 Mission


Street, Suite 460, San Francisco. Mailings and oth-


er activities start at 6:30 PM. Speakers at 7:00 PM.


Business meeting starts at 7:30 PM. For more infor-


mation, contact Jeff Hooper at 510/460-0712 or


Burton Weiss at 510/524-6073.


Marin County CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually third


Monday; fourth Monday in March and April) For


more information on meeting times and location,


contact Greg Brockbank at 415/491-0616.


MID-PENINSULA (PALO ALTO AREA) CHAPTER MEETING:


(Usually fourth Thursday) Meet at 7:30 PM at the


California Federal Bank, 2180 El Camino Real,


Palo Alto. For more information, contact Les


Earnest at 415/941-3964.


MONTEREY COUNTY CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually


third Tuesday) Meet at 7:15 PM, Monterey Library.


For more information, contact Richard Criley at


408/624-7562.


NorTH PENINSULA (SAN MATEO AREA) CHAPTER


MeeTING: (Usually third Monday) Meet at 7:30


PM, at 700 Laurel Street, Park Tower Apartments,


top floor. For more information, contact Marshall


Dinowitz at 415/595-5131.


tor Dick Criley, the event is a boon for


chapter visibility as well as public educa-


tion. "I think it important to establish pub-


lic recognition of civil liberties champions


as role models. Too often those receiving


public recognition are among society's


biggest crooks, albeit successful ones."


The Chapter has also established the


presentation of its Ralph Atkinson Award


as a community institution. The award,


now in its 20th year, has become so much a


part of the community that it is often cited


prominently in newspaper profiles or obit-


uaries of former awardees.


In addition to creating community visi-


bility, both Chapter projects have helped


strengthen the Chapter's membership and


board. "Team building takes time,"


acknowledges Criley, who has been active


in the ACLU for five decades. "It's a deli-


cate creative process that requires persis-


tence and continuity." Hl


Oakland Civilian


Review -


over the past year to demand


increased police accountability in


Oakland led to a successful public hearing


on this crucial issue on February 15. More


than 150 residents packed the City Council


chamber to demand a professional and


modern civilian review mechanism. After


three hours of public testimony, the Council


took a small step in the right direction by


directing city staff to respond to community


demands for strengthening a civilian review


by drafting possible legislation.


"This is our biggest accomplishment in


police practices work so far," said Grover


Dye, Chair of the Earl Warren Chapter


which covers Oakland and other East Bay


cities. "It took a tremendous amount of


preparation - we had meeting after meet-


ing. This was really the fruit of lots of peo-


ple's labor.


Dye credits the achievements of the


Chapter to "excellent coalition work with


local community groups," including


|" he efforts of the Earl Warren Chapter


PUEBLO (People United for a Better


Oakland) and the American Friends


Service Committee as well as outstanding


activism from Chapter members Louise


Rothman-Riemer, Emily Nalven, Mimi


McCorkle and others.


The February session was the first


major public hearing on police account-


ability in Oakland in 16 years. "We've been


wanting to target police accountability in


Oakland for a long time," said John Crew,


Director of the ACLU-NC Police Practices


Project. "This is the first step in the fight


for an authentic civilian review process ...


now the really hard work begins."


The effort for civilian review has


breathed new life into the Chapter Board.


"Working with PUEBLO and AFSC has been


such a positive experience for this chap-


ter," said Dye. "We've learned so much from


working with these dedicated community


organizations."


The police accountability effort is not


the only recent success for the Earl Warren


Chapter. A Chapter Committee against


Drug Prohibition has been working to edu-


cate the public on the medical marijuana


initiative, and the Hotline Committee is


"alive, well and moving" according to Dye.


"Keep plugging away,' he advises other


chapter activists, "eventually it will pay


off."


ACLU-NC EARL WARREN CHAPTER


REDwooD (HUMBOLDT COUNTY) CHAPTER MEETING:


(Usually third Thursday) Meet in the Arcata Jacoby


Storehouse at the Bonvenir Ice Cream Parlor at


7:30 PM. For information on upcoming meeting


dates and times, contact Christina Huskey at


707/444-6595.


SACRAMENTO VALLEY CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually first


Wednesday) Meet at 7:00 PM at the Java City in


Sutter Galleria (between 29 and 30, J and K Streets) in


Sacramento. For more information, contact Ruth


Ordas at 916/488-9955.


SAN FRANCISCO CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually third


Tuesday) Meet at 6:45 PM at the ACLU-NC Office,


1663 Mission Street, Suite #460, San Francisco.


For more information on chapter meetings, call


the Chapter Information Line at 415/979-6699.


SANTA CLARA VALLEY CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually first


Tuesday) Meet at 7:00 PM at the Community Bank


Towers, 3rd Floor Conference Room, 111 West St.


John Street, San Jose. Join us for an Affirmative


Action Speak-Out, featuring a keynote address by


workplace diversity expert Byron Kunisawa.


March 16, 9 AM - 2 PM, San Jose Convention


Center. For information contact Dawn Wright,


Commis-sion on the Status of Women, 408/248-


2434. For further chapter information contact


Catherine Wiehe at 408/226-7421.


SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually


third Thursday) Meet at 7:00 PM at the Louden-


ACLU News = Marcn/Aprit 1996 = Pace 4


Nelson Community Center, Santa Cruz. Contact


Lucille Desjardins at 408/425-5828.


Sonoma County CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually third


Wednesday) Meet at 7:30 PM at the Peace and


Justice Center, 540 Pacific Avenue, Santa Rosa.


Join us for our Annual Dinner on March 29 (see


ad this page). Call Steve Thornton at 707/544-


8115 for more information.


Yoto County CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually third


Thursday) Meet at 7:30 PM, 2505 5th Street #154,


Davis. For more information, call Natalie Wormeli


at 916/756-1900 or the Chapter Hotline at


916/756-ACLU.


Field Action Meetin


(All meetings except those noted will be held at


the ACLU-NC Office, 1663 Mission Street, #460,


San Francisco.)


AFFIRMATIVE ACTION GRASSROOTS COALITION: Meet


every other Wednesday night at the ACLU-NC


office. For more information, contact Lisa


Maldonado at 415/621-2493 ext. 46.


STUDENT OUTREACH Committee: Meet to plan out-


reach activities. For more information, contact


Nancy Otto at 415/621-2006 ext. 37.


STUDENT ADvisory Committee: For more informa-


tion, contact Nancy Otto at 415/621-2006 ext. 37.


Page: of 4