vol. 60, no. 2
Primary tabs
Wotume LX
MarcH/APRIL 1996
NEWSPAPER OF THE AMERICAN Givwil LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN GALIFORNIA
aclu news.
Non-Profit
Organization
US Postage
PAID
Permit No. 4424
San Francisco, CA
Ninth Circuit Upholds Ban on Gas Chamber
66 T's is the death knell for lethal
gas executions in this country,"
said attorney Michael
Laurence, former Director of the ACLU-
NC Death Penalty Project.
Laurence was responding to the 3-0
decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals on February 21 upholding the
landmark ban on San Quentin's gas cham-
ber. The ruling affirmed the 1994 decision
by U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn Hall
Patel that the gas chamber is "cruel and
unusual punishment" and therefore vio-
lates the U.S. Constitution.
"The District Court's findings of
extreme pain, the length of time this
extreme pain lasts, and the substantial
risk that inmates will suffer this extreme
pain for several minutes requires the con-
clusion that execution by lethal gas is cru-
el and unusual,' wrote Judge Harry.
Pregerson in the 20-page opinion. He was
joined by Judges Melvin Brunetti and
Thomas Nelson.
This is the highest court in the coun-
try to determine that the gas chamber -
or any method of state execution - is
cruel and unusual punishment. The rul-
ing applies to all nine states in the Ninth
Circuit's jurisdiction, one of which -
Arizona - is one of the handful of states
that still allows the gas chamber as a
method of execution.
According to Laurence, who called
the gas chamber a "barbaric form of tor-
ture," the decision will have an effect
nationwide. Although the Attorney
General has 90 days to appeal to the U.S.
Supreme Court, the San Francisco
Chronicle reported that Governor Pete
Wilson was "incensed" by the ruling.
California has employed the gas
chamber to execute 196 prisoners since
1987. In 1992, the state Legislature passed | provided that the gas chamber would be |
a law allowing the state to kill by lethal
injection; the law went into effect on
January 1, 1998. However, the legislation
used unless the condemned prisoner elect-
ed to be executed by lethal injection.
In addition to Laurence, cooperating
attorney Warren George of McCutchen,
Doyle, Brown and Enersen is representing
the Death Row inmates in this suit which
was originally filed in April 1992. @
ver 300 abolitionists gathered outside the gates of San
Quentin Prison on the night of February 22 for a vigil in
protest of the state execution of William Bonin, the first con-
demned prisoner in California to die by lethal injection. Bonin
was executed a few minutes after midnight on February 23.
The death penalty opponents were heartened by the
words of Mike Farrell, President of Death Penalty Focus, Derrel
Myers, a San Francisco father whose 23-year old son was mur-
- ATTHE GATES OF SAN QUE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dered in January, Magdaleno Rose-Avila of the Cesar Chavez
Institute and others who spoke out against state killing in the
shadow of the death house. Holding candles and anti-capital
punishment placards, the protestors' songs, prayers and silence
were punctuated by harsh, insulting jeers from a handful of
death penalty supporters.
Staff attorney Kelli Evans (above) was part of the ACLU-NC
staff and chapter activist contingent at the midnight vigil. Hl
TAN MARTIN
SOSSSHSSHSSSHSHSHSHSOSSHSHSHRSHSHOHSHSHSHHHSSHSHSHHHSSSHHSHSHSSHSHSSHSHSHSHSHHHHHOSHEHHFTHOHHSHHHHHSOHSEHOHSSSHSSESSHGESHEH8S8THH8H8ESEH8EH8EHSHEHEHEH8EH8E8TOSGH8TSES8H8SSG8EH82EH88OSEHS EO
Groups Mobilize
to Defeat CCRI
the Anti-Affirmative Action
Initiative
ours after the sponsors of the
H deceptively-titled California Civil
Rights Initiative (CCRI) turned in
their signatures to qualify for the
November 1996 ballot on February 21, a
broad coalition of affirmative action sup-
porters announced their plans to defeat
the measure at the polls.
At a press conference at the ACLU-NC
office, representatives of more than twenty
state and local civil rights, women's and
labor organizations - from the League of
Women Voters to the NAACP to the
California Business Council for Equal
Opportunity - pledged to put their mus-
cle behind a statewide campaign to stop
the initiative.
Members of the
local coalition,
Californians for Affirmative Action, were
joined by Ralph Neas of the National
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights who
pledged national support to defeat the bal-
lot measure.
"This is a fight for the hearts and soul
of what people in California stand for," said
Neas whose organization is the oldest and
largest civil rights coalition in the country.
"Our 185 organizations represent more
than 65 million Americans who care about
equal opportunity," said Neas, "and we all
understand that what happens here in
California will have a profound effect on
the future of affirmative action programs
nationwide."
Californians for Affirmative Action
chair Eva Paterson underscored the grow-
ing opposition from women, labor, and
Continued on page 2
ACLU-NE Annual Reporte
Innocent Man Wins Settlement for 3-Month Jailing
record, he was bound over for trial in
ed Nguyen, a self-employed contrac- | bery. Although he had no arrest or criminal
tor in San Jose, who was arrested |
and jailed for three months solely
because his photograph found its way into
the now-defunct "Asian Mug Book" once
maintained by the San Jose Police
Department, was vindicated on January 23
when the San Jose City Council voted to
award him $150,000 in damages.
The sum was part of a settlement in
Nguyen v. San Jose, the ACLU-NC lawsuit
filed on behalf of Nguyen in March 1992 in
Santa Clara County Superior Court, charg-
ing that officers of the San Jose Police
Department violated his rights to privacy,
due process and equal protection.
Nguyen was represented by ACLU-NC
cooperating attorneys Edward Davis and
Sharon Kirsch of the San Jose office of
Pillsbury, Madison and Sutro; ACLU-NC
Managing Attorney Alan Schlosser and
Richard Konda of the Asian Law Alliance.
"This settlement is extremely significant
for two reasons," said attorney Davis. "First,
it provides a small measure of compensa-
tion for Ted Nguyen who spent 90 days in jail
for a crime he didn't commit because of a
police department practice based on race.
"In addition, it sends a warning to all
other law enforcement agencies that if
they are going to use race-based photo ID
books - they could very well have prob-
lems," Davis added.
"This was discrimination," said Nguyen,
adding that he is happy with the settle-
ment but that he "would feel better about
justice" if they did not "jail and prosecute
an innocent man based on race."
400 VIETNAMESE MEN
The mugbook contained over 400 pic-
tures of Asian men between the ages of 18
and 25, 95% of them Vietnamese, many of
whom had never been arrested or convict-
ed of a crime. It had been used by the San
Jose Police Department since 1989.
Nguyen's picture was in the book
because in the spring of 1990, he drove up
to a friend's house where San Jose police
were conducting a narcotics investigation.
After the police confronted him, he was
detained for questioning and released
without charges. After being questioned,
Nguyen's photo was taken and, without his
knowledge, placed in the Asian Mug Book.
A year later, the police were investigat-
ing a robbery allegedly committed by a
group of Vietnamese men. The victim was
shown the Asian Mug Book and she identi-
fied two photos as being the robbers, one of
which was the photo of Nguyen. The police
did not arrange a line-up to require the vic-
tim to identify Nguyen in person. Rather,
based solely on the identification from the
photograph, Nguyen was arrested, booked
and charged with first degree armed rob-
(c)8208 CCO8SSOHSOCOHSEHESHSSEOH8SEE8O
Board Election...
Continued from page |
held on September 12, 1996.] Members of
the Board may propose additional nomina-
tions. Ifno additional nominations are pro-
posed by Board members, the Board, by a
majority of those present and voting, shall
adopt the Nominating Committee's report.
If additional nominations are proposed, the
Board shall, by written ballot, elect a slate
of nominees with each member being enti-
tled to cast a number of votes equal to the
vacancies to be filled; the Board slate of
nominees shall be those persons, equal in
number to the vacancies to be filled, who
have received the greatest number of votes.
The list of nominees to be placed before the
membership of the Union for election shall
be those person nominated by the Board as
herein provided, together with those per-
Superior Court; bail was set at $500,000.
CLEARED OF ALL CHARGES
After being jailed for over 90 days, Nguyen
was eventually acquitted by a jury of all
charges. In addition to his time in jail and
the thousands of dollars in legal fees, his
business suffered as a result of his arrest
and incarceration.
Groups Mobilize Against CCRI...
Continued from page |
minority voters to the initiative which, she
charged, "would turn back the clock on
equal opportunity in the state of
California."
Ralph Neas (center) of the National Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, joins ACLU-
NC Executive Director Dorothy Ehrlich (seated left), Californians for Affirmative Action
Chair Eva Paterson (seated right) and representatives of more than twenty women s
and civil rights groups at a press conference to launch the campaign to defeat CCRI.
ACLU-NC staff attorney Schlosser not-
ed, "Placing an individual's photo in a mug
book that is shown to crime victims expos-
es that individual to the danger of being
misidentified and prosecuted for a crime
he never committed. That this is not just a
theoretical danger is vividly demonstrated
by this case - for that is exactly what hap-
pened to Ted Nguyen.
"The mug book used by San Jose police
exposed only Asians to this dangerous
We urge all ACLU-NC members to get
involved in the campaign to stop CCRI at
the polls. To find out what you can do, call
your local Chapter (see Field Calendar on
p. 4 for contact numbers), or send in the
coupon below.
Be Prepared...
to Fight for
Affirmative
Action
READ UP -
New Brochure
on Affirmative
Action
The new ACLU brochure Affirmative
Action California: Why It Is Still Necessary, a
collaborative publication of the state's three
ACLU atfiliates, is full of useful facts on the
history and impact of affirmative action as
well as powerful arguments in defense of
the programs.
The 6-page pamphlet is an informative,
easy-to-use tool for speakers and organiz-
ers. More than 5,000 copies have already
been distributed around the state.
To order your copy, send in the coupon
below.
AND SIGN uP!
I Support Affirmative Action
O Keep me posted on ACLU activities
Send me a copy of Affirmative Action California
NAME
ADDRESS
City STATE Zip
PHONE (DAYS) (EVES),
FAX E-MAat
PLEASE FILL OUT AND RETURN TO.
FIELD DEPARTMENT, ACLU-NC, 1663 Mission STREET, #460, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103.
sons nominated by petition as hereafter
provided in Section 4.
Article VII, Section 4: Any fifteen or
more members of the Union in good stand-
ing may themselves submit a nomination to
be included among those voted upon by the
general membership by submitting a writ-
ten petition to the Board not later than
twenty days after the adoption by the Board
of the slate of Board nominees. No member
of the Union may sign more than one such
petition, and each such nomination shall be
accompanied by a summary of qualifica-
tions and the written consent of the nomi-
nee. @
Covarrubiaz
practice," Schlosser explained. "If a non-
Asian had been in the car with Ted when he
was stopped, that person would never had
his photo placed in the book, and exposed
to the risk of being falsely accused.
Furthermore this policy was even more
questionable because photos were includ-
ed of individuals who, like Ted Nguyen, had
not been convicted or even arrested for a
criminal offense.
"Finally there were no due process safe-
guards - persons were not informed that
their photos were in the book and there
was no policy limiting the amount of time
that their photo would stay there. Thus,
Nguyen's photo was placed in the book
without his knowledge or consent, and it
remained there for more than a year when
he was misidentified by the robbery victim.
Only then did Mr. Nguyen even learn that
his photo was part of the Asian mug book,"
Schlosser added. -
MUGBOOK SCRAPPED
In response to what happened to Nguyen,
community and civil rights groups demand-
ed that the Asian mugbook be scrapped. In
February 1992, Police Chief Lou
announced that the
Department would stop using the book and
return all photographs to the computerized
photo file bank.
"Although the Department is no longer
using the Asian mug book, unfortunately
this type of police practice is not limited to
San Jose," Schlosser said. "The ACLU has
investigated a number of instances where,
in the name of combatting gang activities, -
police detain and photograph minority
youth based solely on their ethnicity or
manner of dress. Such practices raise seri-
ous constitutional issues, as well as the
specter of innocent young people ending
up in police files without any objective evi-
dence linking them to criminal activity."
Schlosser noted the ACLU case of
Pham v. City of Garden Grove, where two
Vietnamese high school honor students
were detained and photographed for police
gang files solely on the basis of their race.
The two teenage girls in the Orange
County community were not acting illegally -
nor had they ever been arrested or charged
with any crimes. They were not formally
charged, but their photographs were
entered into a law enforcement computer
gang database - leading to the police
detention of one of the girls for a second
time. That case was settled in U.S. District
Court on February 9, with the Garden
Grove Police Department agreeing to
revise a number of policies and procedures,
including those that govern field inter-
views, photographs and the criteria for
labeling individuals as gang members.
"The tragic ordeal of Ted Nguyen
underscores the dangers of police depart-
ments using race, `gang' profiles or other
loose criteria to put photographs of inno-
cent people in their files," concluded attor-
ney Ed Davis. "This practice simply can't be
tolerated."
ACLU News = Marcn/Apri: 1996 = Pace 2
Wilson, UC Regents
Violate Open
Meetings Law
ACLU affiliates of Southern and
Northern California, filed suit on
February 16, charging that Governor Pete
Wilson and a quorum of the U.C. Board of
Regents violated the Bagley-Keene Open
Meetings Act by secretly committing to
eliminate affirmative action in the
University of California prior to their July
20, 1995 public session. The Daily Nexus v.
UC Regents, filed in San Francisco
Superior Court, maintains that the
Regents' decision abolishing affirmative
action is therefore, "null and void."
Tim Molloy, campus reporter for the
Daily Nexus, the U.C. Santa Barbara stu-
dent newspaper, was informed that Wilson
and between 10 to 15 of the Regents partic-
ipated in a series of private one-on-one
conversations regarding affirmative action
in U.C. admissions and hiring before the
July 20 public hearing. Based on this infor-
mation, Molloy used the California Public
Records Act to request phone numbers
called by Governor Wilson from July 10,
1995, through July 19, 1995.
S tudent reporters, represented by the
"I have tried through nearly thirty _
Public Records Act requests to gather
information that would help answer the
question of whether the Board violated the
Bagley-Keene Act," explained Molloy at a
San Francisco press conference following
the filing of the suit. "But hesitance on the
part of the Governor's Office to release
records I believe should be public, as well
as incongruities in statements from the
Governor's Office, have led me to believe
that this case is the last possible means by
which we can determine what actually led
to the votes.
To date, the newspaper has not
received any of the requested records.
Editor-in-chief Suzanne Garner maintains
that the Daily Nexus is not taking a posi-
tion on affirmative action at the University
but is challenging the Regents' decision
because the state officials violated their
obligation to deliberate in public.
"There is simply no place for backroom
politics in public decision-making.
Officials must be held accountable for
their actions and this becomes impossible
when they deliberate behind closed doors.
You can't get around the public meetings
law by forming a united front through tele-
phone calls before voting," explained
ACLU-NC staff attorney Ed Chen.
In a 1985 case, the California Court of
Appeal ruled that a series of telephone
calls to line up votes in a Stockton redevel-
. opment agency violated the local open
meeting law. The state law contains the
same language as that local version.
The Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act
specifically requires the U.C. Regents'
meetings to be conducted in public and
prohibits a quorum or majority from evad-
ing this requirement by forming a "collec-
tive commitment" to take a particular
action outside a public meeting.
The plaintiffs may seek a court order
blocking implementation of the Regents'
decision pending a court ruling. If the
court declares the Regents' vote void, the
Regents would have to reconsider their
motions to abolish affirmative action at
the University.
The Daily Nexus is represented by
ACLU-SC attorneys Dan Tokaji and Mark
Rosenbaum; ACLU-NC staff attorney Ed
Chen, First Amendment Project attorneys
James Wheaton and Elizabeth Pritzker,
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights attor-
neys Eva Paterson and Nancy Stuart, Equal
Rights Advocates attorney Judith E. Kurtz,
and Karl Manheim of Loyola Law School.
Register to Vote Now,
at a DMV Near You
By MariA ARCHULETA
egistering to vote has just become
R as simple as walking into the near-
est DMV. On January 22, in the suit
Voting Rights Coalition v. Wilson, the U.S.
Supreme Court denied Governor Pete
Wilson's petition to stop the implementa-
tion of the National Voter Registration Act
(NVRA), the "motor voter" law, which allows
citizens to register to vote by mail and in
person at DMV offices, welfare depart-
ments and other government agencies.
On December 15, 1994 a coalition of
voting rights groups, represented by the
ACLU affiliates of Northern and Southern
California and other public interest
lawyers, filed suit to force implementation
of the measure enacted by Congress in
1998 to address the problem that 37% of
the country's eligible electorate are not
registered to vote. Despite the fact that
California had the lowest rate of registered
voters in the nation, Wilson refused to put
the law into effect. On January 23, 1995, in
a separate suit, the U.S. Department of
Justice also sued California for its failure to
comply. In March, 1995, a U.S District Court
found the "motor voter" law to be constitu-
tional and ordered the state to implement
the law by mid-June; Wilson appealed. In
July, 1995 the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals rejected Wilson's appeal, and the
Governor unsuccessfully appealed once
more to the U.S. Supreme Court.
"The door to the voting booth just
opened a lot wider, and Governor Wilson is
not in the way," said Alan Schlosser,
Managing Attorney of the ACLU of
Northern California. "Failure to imple-
ment this law - which was passed to help
close the gap between minority and white
voter registration rates - would have a
particularly harmful effect on minority
communities and the poor," Schlosser
added.
In all seven states (California, Illinois,
Kansas, Michigan, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Virginia) where governors had to
be sued to implement the motor voter law,
courts have upheld the measure as consti-
tutional. In California, more than 100,000
people have been registering to vote each
month since the state was forced to imple-
ment the measure last June.
The voting rights coalition was repre-
sented by Schlosser, Mark Rosenbaum and
Dan Tokaji of the ACLU of Southern
California, Lawyers' Committee for Civil
-Rights Associate Director Robert Rubin,
the Asian Law Caucus and other public
interest legal organizations. @
ACLU News = Marcn/Aprit 1996 = Pace 3 :
es)
Heisler Moot Court
Another Successful Tradition for
Monterey Segre
BY LisA MALDONADO
unique program sponsored by the
Aimer County Chapter is ensur-
ing that aspiring lawyers learn how
to advocate for civil liberties even before
they graduate law school.
In 1986, in memory of renowned attor-
ney Francis Heisler, a former Chapter
Board member who died in 1984, the
Chapter established the Heisler Moot
Court at the Monterey College of Law.
Heisler, who taught at the college and
donated his extensive law library to the
school after his retirement, was honored
during his lifetime by both the Chapter and
the affiliate for his outstanding contribu-
tions to civil liberties.
The Heisler Moot Court, which has
become an institution in Monterey County,
is a competition in oral advocacy for law
.students who tackle major law and social
policy issues - ranging from pornography
and the rights of women, to drug testing, to
religion in the schools. Students present
their arguments to a distinguished panel of
judges who question and challenge the stu-
dents on their legal knowledge before a
public audience. The biannual program
also includes a civil liberties address by a
Francis Heisler at the 1977 ACLU-NC
Bill of Rights Day Celebration.
Monterey Chapter activist.
This year the Heisler Moot Court
focused on the timely issue of governmental
regulation of free speech on the internet.
"Our sixth biannual Heisler Moot Court
marks yet another successful result of our
Chapter's efforts to establish ourselves as
an integral presence in the Monterey
County community," said Chapter Chair
Catherine Stoner.
For Monterey Chapter Executive Direc-
ACLIU-NC S@eNOMA CHAPTER
INVITES YOU
FEATURING
former U.S. Representative
DAN HAMBURG
n "Civil Liberties in Two Societies:
U.S. and South Africa"
and
Founder of the UC Berkeley Free
Speech Movement
MArio SAVIO
on "Diversity and Affirmative Action
On and Off Campus"
Chapter Meetings
(Chapter meetings are open to all interested mem-
bers. Contact the Chapter activist listed for your
area.)
B-A-R-K (BERKELEY-ALBANY-RICHMOND-KENSING-
TON) Chapter Meeting: (Usually fourth Thursday)
Volunteers needed for the chapter hotline - call
Tom Sarbaugh at 510/526-6376 for further
details. For more information, time and address of
meetings, contact Jim Chanin at 510/848-4752 or
Rachel Richman at 510/540-5507.
EARL WARREN (OAKLAND/ALAMEDA COUNTY)
CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually first Wednesday) New
meeting location Meet at 7:30 PM at Claremont
House/Activity Room, 4500 Gilbert Street,
Oakland (nr. Rockridge Shopping Center). We
encourage new members to join us as we work on
our high school essay contest, the Oakland civil-
ian review board, affirmative action, and ending
drug prohibition. For more information, call
David Gassman at 510/835-2334.
FRESNO CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually second
Wednesday) For information on date and time of
meetings, call Nadya Coleman at 209/229-7178.
TO ATTEND OUR
For more information, contact Steve Thornton (707) 544-8115
Friday, March 29
No Host Bar and Music
5:30 PM
Dinner 7 pm
Sebastopol Veterans
Memorial Building
$15 tickets before March 15 / $10
low income or kids under 16
after March 15: $20/$15
LESBIAN AND GAY RIGHTS CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually
first Thursday) ACLU-NC office, 1663 Mission
Street, Suite 460, San Francisco. Mailings and oth-
er activities start at 6:30 PM. Speakers at 7:00 PM.
Business meeting starts at 7:30 PM. For more infor-
mation, contact Jeff Hooper at 510/460-0712 or
Burton Weiss at 510/524-6073.
Marin County CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually third
Monday; fourth Monday in March and April) For
more information on meeting times and location,
contact Greg Brockbank at 415/491-0616.
MID-PENINSULA (PALO ALTO AREA) CHAPTER MEETING:
(Usually fourth Thursday) Meet at 7:30 PM at the
California Federal Bank, 2180 El Camino Real,
Palo Alto. For more information, contact Les
Earnest at 415/941-3964.
MONTEREY COUNTY CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually
third Tuesday) Meet at 7:15 PM, Monterey Library.
For more information, contact Richard Criley at
408/624-7562.
NorTH PENINSULA (SAN MATEO AREA) CHAPTER
MeeTING: (Usually third Monday) Meet at 7:30
PM, at 700 Laurel Street, Park Tower Apartments,
top floor. For more information, contact Marshall
Dinowitz at 415/595-5131.
tor Dick Criley, the event is a boon for
chapter visibility as well as public educa-
tion. "I think it important to establish pub-
lic recognition of civil liberties champions
as role models. Too often those receiving
public recognition are among society's
biggest crooks, albeit successful ones."
The Chapter has also established the
presentation of its Ralph Atkinson Award
as a community institution. The award,
now in its 20th year, has become so much a
part of the community that it is often cited
prominently in newspaper profiles or obit-
uaries of former awardees.
In addition to creating community visi-
bility, both Chapter projects have helped
strengthen the Chapter's membership and
board. "Team building takes time,"
acknowledges Criley, who has been active
in the ACLU for five decades. "It's a deli-
cate creative process that requires persis-
tence and continuity." Hl
Oakland Civilian
Review -
over the past year to demand
increased police accountability in
Oakland led to a successful public hearing
on this crucial issue on February 15. More
than 150 residents packed the City Council
chamber to demand a professional and
modern civilian review mechanism. After
three hours of public testimony, the Council
took a small step in the right direction by
directing city staff to respond to community
demands for strengthening a civilian review
by drafting possible legislation.
"This is our biggest accomplishment in
police practices work so far," said Grover
Dye, Chair of the Earl Warren Chapter
which covers Oakland and other East Bay
cities. "It took a tremendous amount of
preparation - we had meeting after meet-
ing. This was really the fruit of lots of peo-
ple's labor.
Dye credits the achievements of the
Chapter to "excellent coalition work with
local community groups," including
|" he efforts of the Earl Warren Chapter
PUEBLO (People United for a Better
Oakland) and the American Friends
Service Committee as well as outstanding
activism from Chapter members Louise
Rothman-Riemer, Emily Nalven, Mimi
McCorkle and others.
The February session was the first
major public hearing on police account-
ability in Oakland in 16 years. "We've been
wanting to target police accountability in
Oakland for a long time," said John Crew,
Director of the ACLU-NC Police Practices
Project. "This is the first step in the fight
for an authentic civilian review process ...
now the really hard work begins."
The effort for civilian review has
breathed new life into the Chapter Board.
"Working with PUEBLO and AFSC has been
such a positive experience for this chap-
ter," said Dye. "We've learned so much from
working with these dedicated community
organizations."
The police accountability effort is not
the only recent success for the Earl Warren
Chapter. A Chapter Committee against
Drug Prohibition has been working to edu-
cate the public on the medical marijuana
initiative, and the Hotline Committee is
"alive, well and moving" according to Dye.
"Keep plugging away,' he advises other
chapter activists, "eventually it will pay
off."
ACLU-NC EARL WARREN CHAPTER
REDwooD (HUMBOLDT COUNTY) CHAPTER MEETING:
(Usually third Thursday) Meet in the Arcata Jacoby
Storehouse at the Bonvenir Ice Cream Parlor at
7:30 PM. For information on upcoming meeting
dates and times, contact Christina Huskey at
707/444-6595.
SACRAMENTO VALLEY CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually first
Wednesday) Meet at 7:00 PM at the Java City in
Sutter Galleria (between 29 and 30, J and K Streets) in
Sacramento. For more information, contact Ruth
Ordas at 916/488-9955.
SAN FRANCISCO CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually third
Tuesday) Meet at 6:45 PM at the ACLU-NC Office,
1663 Mission Street, Suite #460, San Francisco.
For more information on chapter meetings, call
the Chapter Information Line at 415/979-6699.
SANTA CLARA VALLEY CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually first
Tuesday) Meet at 7:00 PM at the Community Bank
Towers, 3rd Floor Conference Room, 111 West St.
John Street, San Jose. Join us for an Affirmative
Action Speak-Out, featuring a keynote address by
workplace diversity expert Byron Kunisawa.
March 16, 9 AM - 2 PM, San Jose Convention
Center. For information contact Dawn Wright,
Commis-sion on the Status of Women, 408/248-
2434. For further chapter information contact
Catherine Wiehe at 408/226-7421.
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually
third Thursday) Meet at 7:00 PM at the Louden-
ACLU News = Marcn/Aprit 1996 = Pace 4
Nelson Community Center, Santa Cruz. Contact
Lucille Desjardins at 408/425-5828.
Sonoma County CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually third
Wednesday) Meet at 7:30 PM at the Peace and
Justice Center, 540 Pacific Avenue, Santa Rosa.
Join us for our Annual Dinner on March 29 (see
ad this page). Call Steve Thornton at 707/544-
8115 for more information.
Yoto County CHAPTER MEETING: (Usually third
Thursday) Meet at 7:30 PM, 2505 5th Street #154,
Davis. For more information, call Natalie Wormeli
at 916/756-1900 or the Chapter Hotline at
916/756-ACLU.
Field Action Meetin
(All meetings except those noted will be held at
the ACLU-NC Office, 1663 Mission Street, #460,
San Francisco.)
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION GRASSROOTS COALITION: Meet
every other Wednesday night at the ACLU-NC
office. For more information, contact Lisa
Maldonado at 415/621-2493 ext. 46.
STUDENT OUTREACH Committee: Meet to plan out-
reach activities. For more information, contact
Nancy Otto at 415/621-2006 ext. 37.
STUDENT ADvisory Committee: For more informa-
tion, contact Nancy Otto at 415/621-2006 ext. 37.