Letter from Roger Baldwin, Director, American Civil Liberties Union, to Homer L. Morris, American Friends Service Committee, March 1, 1943

Primary tabs

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION


170 FIFTH AVENUE


NEW YORK CITY


GES 400


Yereh 1, 194%


dr. Homer L. Morris


Americen Friends Service Geant thee


20 South 12 Street


Philadelphia, Pa.


Dear wr. Horris:


- [ am writing as one of the trustees of the Robert Marshall


Civil Liberties Trust, which contributed $1,000 to the fund being


raised by the Friends for the appeal in the case of Gordon |


lirapayashi. It wes stated in your letter that you were endeavor-


ing to raise " fund of $2,000 to earry the case to the 0. .


Susrege Court with wr. Walters of Seattle acting es sttorney.


ir. falters aspesred for him in the Cireuit Court of Appesls


at Sen Franciseo on February 19 end avpsrently disappointed every-


body interested in these cases, One of your own workers, Jorenh


Conard, has exoressed his views in a letter to your Service fom-


mittee members in Seattle, from which I take the Liberty of


quoting: |


"On the other hend I do feel I should write you quite frankly


about Mr. Walters' effectiveness in the trial here. It wes


not only my own ooinion but that of everyone with whom I


have spoken that dr. falters' presentetion was not ohly poor


but pitifully so. I eid judge that hie point of view is


absolutely toos and that he is a grand person, but he was


completely unable to meet the essential issues; he antagonized


the court and resestedly failed to answer legitimate cuestions


asked by the judge. I am sure that everyone here, including


the Friends who were at the trial, Ernest Besig of the Ean


Francisco A.C.L.0., Sirin of the Loe Angeles .C.L.U. and


Rorthern Californie Board members, will join me in hooing that


we try to secure a really high grade, and tf poseible, a


rominent ettorney for eny further heerings. In any case


r. Walters does not seem adequate. `


"It may be that you were not planning to send Welters or that


you are not even involved in this, but in any case I assumed |


that you would want e frank statement, end I trust you will not


think I sm meddling in your plans by writing xs i heve.*


ir, Conard confirms whet our orn representatives at the hearing


-peported. I ghould think it would be wise now, in the event of an


adverse decision which is etpected, to see that somebody else than


ir. Salters argues the esse in the fupreme Court. fe sitowld be


very glad to make recommendations if you #ish.


Sincerely yours,


PNB/sa ; Roger N. Baldwin


ec to Ernest Besig


aa eee _-- Harshall Fund


Page: of 1