vol. 14, no. 2
Primary tabs
American
Civil
Union-News
Liberties
Free Assemb
Free Speec! :
lage
"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty."
Vol. XIV
SAN FRANCISCO, FEBRUARY, 1949
No. 2
ene gee
poi
Tenney Promises Reforms
In "Red Hunt' Procedures
Senator Jack B. Tenney has promised to reform
his red hunting State Senate Committee on un-
American Activities, according to a story in the
January 19 issue of the San Francisco News
written by its star political reporter, Mary Ellen
Leary.
"The chief point on which the senator agreed
his committee has erred," says Miss Leary, "is
in smearing persons who have never been formal-
ly charged with any wrong-doing or tracked
down by his committee, but have been named
haphazardly for `questionable' alliances on which
they have never had a chance to testify.
""Names that some witnesses brought out, or
names that appeared on letterheads, or names
that just popped into testimony have sometimes
been smeared in public opinion because they came
out in our report, Senator Tenney is quoted as
saying.
" "We have gotten the largest amount of criti-
cism for this. I personally think it's a meritorious
eriticism, | oS
Hereafter, the committee plans to make a very
careful separation of its "report,'' which contains
opinions and judgments which the committee
forms on persons related to un-Americanism, and
the testimony offered on which that report is
based. "We're going to ignore the whoie letter
head brigade of Communist fronts," Sen. Tenney
is reported as saying.
All persons named in testimony hereafter will
have a transcript of such testimony sent to them
and a chance to put their reply in the record.
The Tenney committee does not intend to per-
mit cross-examination because the senator con-
siders Communists "would abuse the privilege."
As for granting a witness the right to consult
- eounsel when before his committee, Senator Ten-
ney says that is followed now.
oo
Suits Filed to Stop Summary
Removal of 2 Issei to Japan
Writs of habeas corpus were filed in the
federal court in San Francisco on January 13
in behalf of two Issei who were taken into
custody by the Immigration Service for removal
to Japan as "dangerous enemy aliens." The
petitions will not be heard until March 7. In the
meantime, Judge Michael J. Roche has ordered
the men freed pending a final determination of
their cases so that they may return to their
homes.
The suits were brought by Frank Y. Miyazawa,
Seattle business man, and Makio Kobayashi, Og-
den laundrymen. The men are represented by at-
torneys Wayne M. Collins, George Olshausen and
Theodore Tamba of San Francisco.
The Government is proceeding under the Alien
Enemy Act of 1797, which permits the President
to arrest and summarily deport enemy aliens
during wartime. Last year, the U. S. Supreme
Court, in a 5 to 4 decision, held that the operation
of the Act does not end with the cessation of
hostilities.
Kobayashi has resided in this country since
August 21, 1919. Miyazawa has resided here
since February 9, 1909.
The two men are the last of a group of 59
Japanese long-time legal residents of the United
States, who were interned during the war. Mr.
Collins negotiated the release of 20 men (many
with families) who had been interned for six
years. The removal of the remaining 39 was
stayed by the filing of a habeas corpus suit in the
federal court in Philadelphia. Thereafter, the
Government released another dozen internees,
and the remaining 27 were paroled into the cus-
tody of Mr. Collins while the Philadelphia case
was pending on appeal. Last fall, the Justice
Department finally ordered the release of all but
Kobayashi and Miyazawa, and the Philadelphia
suit was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.
A Survey of Proposals Affecting Civil
Liberties Introduced in the Cal. Legislature
Civil liberties bills at the current session of
the California Legislature fall into three catego-
ries - red-hunting bills, race relations measures
and a miscellaneous group of proposals. The
good bills are essentially in the racial field.
This survey does not undertake to cover the
bills introduced during the last week of the first
session of the Legislature which has adjourned
until March. Since there is a veritable deluge of
bills introduced during the last week of the first
session, the following article can only give about
half of the picture at this point.
Also, in submitting this information, it should
be borne in mind that the Union's Executive Com-
mittee has not had an opportunity to pass upon
the various measures, so any opinions expressed
are merely those of the writer of this article.
Alleged Racial Discrimination
By Draft Board Probed
The ACLU of Northern California is trying to
find out whether the Placer County Selective
Board at Auburn, California, is engaging in racial
discrimination in making its draft calls. Thus
far, nine men have been inducted into the Army
from that Board, of whom eight were of Japanese
ancestry.
The State Director of the Selective Service
System, Col. K. H. Leitch, in response to the
Union's request for an investigation, declared,
"We have looked into the matter and find no
irregularities and no departure from the Regu-
lations." -
The Union requested a further examination of
the matter, in view of the fact that Placer County
does not have a preponderance of Japanese in its
population, and especially because Placer County
at one time had the reputation of being violently
anti-Japanese in its sentiments. The Union asked
to be supplied with the total registration of
the board as well as the number of Japanese
registrants.
Col. Charles F. Going, Deputy State Director
of Selective Service, late last month advised the
Union that `the total registration. for Local
Board No. 17 is two thousand four hundred sixty-
one, of whom nine have been inducted. Hight
were of Japanese ancestry and the ninth was not.
Of the one hundred forty-five registrants of
Japanese ancestry in that local board, seventeen
are in I-A, ninety-five are deferred or exempted,
twenty-four are unclassified, and as stated above,
eight were inducted and one other enlisted. The
local board so far has ordered forty-five regis-
trants for pre-induction physical examination, of
which twenty-one were of Japanese ancestry and
twenty-four were not.
"As stated in our previous correspondence,"
said Col. Going, `"`we see no evidence whatsoever
of the board's having acted arbitrarily or capri-
ciously. The explanation appears to lie in the fact
-that there was a preponderance of registrants
of Japanese ancestry in the older age groups from
which the board is bound to make its first selec-
tions."
Section 631.7 of the Selective Service regula-
tions provides that registrants shall be selected
and ordered to report for induction in the order
of their dates of birth, with the oldest being
selected first. The Board in question has seven
Nisei who were born in 1922, twenty-seven who
were born in 1923, twenty who were born in 1924,
and twenty-two who were korn in 1925.
General Lewis B. Hershey, national director of
the Selective Service System, has also been re-
quested to investigate the matter. On the basis
of the available information, it is still not clear
why eight out of nine of the board's inductees
were persons of Japanese ancestry, unless there
were practically no Caucasians in the 1922 and
1923 age groups who were subject to induction.
-and Stalin. ~
Senator Jack B. Tenney of Los Angeles, has
introduced his usual quota of red-hunting bills.
Heading the list, of course, is a resolution to
extend the life of the Senate Committee on un-
American Activities for another two years. This
year, however, he has asked for the fantastic
sum of $150,000 with which to finance the com-
mittee's operations-more than the Committee
has spent to this point since its creation on Janu-
ary 21, 1941. Mr. Tenney, no doubt, will be ready
to settle for $100,000, which would still be $5500
more than committee's of this type have cost
during the eight years of their existence.
Assemblyman Elliott and others have intro-
duced Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 6
lambasting the Tenney Committee and declaring
it to be a legislative policy to discontinue such
committees, and to refer matters of subversive
activities to law enforcement agencies.
Seven bills have been introduced on the sub-
ject of loyalty oaths and loyalty checks. A. B. 255
requires all public employees to take loyalty oaths.
Senator Tenney and ten of his supporters have
introduced S. B. 280 which would require public
employees to file an affidavit every year declar-
ing they were not Communists.
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 13 calls
upon members of the Legislature voluntarily to
file affidavits declaring that they are not Com-
munists, and under a proposed constitutional
amendment No. 14, introduced by Senator Tenney
and others, all public officials would be required
to take an oath that they were not Communists
and that they did `not openly or secretly sup-
port any organization which advocates, advises
or practices the political theories of Marx, Lenin
Assembly Constitutional Amend-
ment No. 32 proposed by Mr. Butters and others
is similar to that of Mr. Tenney's.
Another one of Senator Tenney's bills, S. B. 132,
would require all candidates for public office to
swear that they had not "at any time within the
five years next preceding the making of this
declaration, advocated, promulgated, taught or
practiced the communism of Marx, Lenin and
Stalin.
Finally, applicants for the State bar and law-
yers would be subject to a loyalty check and,
after a hearing, could be denied membership in
the State bar.
Another series of bills introduced by Senator
Tenney is also aimed at "subversive activities."
S. B. 129 defines what is communism and what
is a "communist." For example, anybody who
attended a meeting where communism was ad-
vocated would be a communist.
S. B. 1380 would make it a crime ``to teach com-
munism, nazism, fascism, or any other system or
plan of government ... with intent to indoctri-
nate any pupil..." If such a bill were adopted,
it would become mighty dangerous to mention
anything about these subjects in a classroom.
S. B. 297 would "require public records of at-
tendance to be had of secret meetings of organi-
(Continued on Page 3, Column 2)
;
Final Action in Nisei Citizenship `
Renunciation Cases Set for Feb. 25
Federal Judge Louis Goodman of San Fran-
cisco on January 25 granted the Justice Depart-
ment until February 25 in which to designate the
names of those Nisei renunciants it claims ``acted
freely and voluntarily" in renouncing their U. S.
citizenship. It seems highly improbable that
Judge Goodman will grant the Government a
further extension on February 25, but that he
will sign the final order restoring citizenship to
the Nisei who renounced under duress. Attorney
Wayne M. Collins of San Francisco represents
more than five thousand renunciants involved
in the case.
Page 2
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS
Union Urges D.A. to Prosecute
Brutal S.F. Police Officers
The ACLU last month urged District Attorney
Edmund G. Brown of San Francisco to file crim-
inal charges against two police officers who are
charged with brutally beating one Stewart Bring-
hurst. The officers have been suspended from
their jobs pending a hearing before the Police
Commission, which may result in disciplinary
action.
The police officers defended themselves by
stating that such "workings over" were a com-
mon practice on San Francisco's waterfront. This
led the Union to request "a broad investigation
into police practices in San Francisco." :
The Union's letter to District Attorney Brown
reminded him that the Union's Executive Com-
mittee had recently adopted a resolution `"pro-
testing the inaction of your office in alleged
police brutality cases. While we are not unmind-
ful that such cases present difficult problems for
the prosecutor," the letter went on to say, `"`we
are not convinced that your office has taken
proper action to end lawless enforcement of the
- law by police officers in San Francisco."
The District Attorney recently stated to Ernest
Besig, the Union's director, that there is no police
- brutality problem in San Francisco. The Union
contended that recent occurrences "would appear
to cast serious doubt upon the accuracy of your
conclusions."
In answering the letter, Mr. Brown gave as-
surances that his office would `not in the slight-
est degree tolerate police brutality." At the same
time, he suggested that the problem was properly
one for the Police Department. `"They are charged
' with the duty of investigating all crimes, whether
committed by policemen or anyone else. If they
fail to act, then this office is willing to move into
the picture."
In the present case, Mr. Brown stated, "I think
it is far wiser to await the outcome of the Police
Commission hearing, and if they fail to act we
can proceed by criminal complaint. I have sug-
gested such a procedure to the attorney for the
complaining witness. If he does not believe that
this course is advisable, I am quite willing to re-
_ consider."" My. Brown believes the hearing before
the Police Commission will be speedily disposed of.
In certain police brutality cases that arose last
fall, the Union brought the complainants to the
District Attorney's office. They were ready to
sign complaints but nothing was ever done despite
the urging of the Union. The same lack of inter-
est was shown by the District Attorney's office
in the case of Constantine Theodus, which arose
the latter part of September.
It appears to be a common practice for the
San Francisco Police Department to whitewash
police brutality cases. When cases arise, the
police conduct an investigation or "rinky do" as it
is known in the department, and the officers and
the department are thoroughly whitewashed.
-S.F. Police Claim `Traffic
Checks' Are Not 'Road Blocks'
The San Francisco Police Commission last
month denied it has revived its former practice
of setting up "road blocks' to check automobiles
for violations of the Vehicle Code. It claimed it
is merely conducting a "traffic check" in which
"vehicular traffic is required to slow down at a
given location so that the officers may have an
opportunity to observe the conduct of the driver
of the vehicle."
The Union had protested against an alleged
"road block" on December 24 in which 553 auto-
mobiles were inspected. Under the law, motor-
ists are entitled to use the highways "without
interruption or search," unless a public officer
has "probable cause" for believing that the occu-
pants are violating the law. What the Commis-
sion appears to be saying is that requiring auto-
mobiles to slow down for a `"`traffic check' is not
the kind of interruption which the law prohibits.
Last month the Union also received an ac-
knowledgment of its protest against "road blocks"
maintained by the California Highway Patrol.
Commissioner Clifford E. Pterson advised the
Union he was having a study made of the legal
question before deciding the matter.
we CO
Union's First National Conference Now
Scheduled for New York March 19-21
The first national conference of representatives
of the American Civil Liberties Union will be
held in New York City from March 19 to 21.
_ Ernest Besig, the Union's local director, will
attend.
The object of the conference, according to the
Union's national office, is to discuss the position
of the Union in relation to certain debatable
public issues and, particularly, the internal rela-
tionships of the Union's governing bodies, affili-
ates and members.
nae 2
Communist in '30s Ruled
Against in Loyalty Case
The latest loyalty case to come to the attention
of the ACLU of Northern California is that of
an employee of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
The Interior Department Loyalty Board found
against him and an appeal is presently pending
before the Secretary of the Interior.
It was not charged that the employee was
presently a member of the Communist Party. It
was alleged, however, that he had been a member
of the party in the early '30s; that he signed a
petition to place the party on the ballot; that he
held Communist meetings in his home; that he
loaned the Communists a loud speaker; and that
he purchased copies of the People's World in
1940.
The employee sent a frank answer admitting
membership in the Communist Party for eight
months. "I admit," said he, "to having been
taken in by them for a short time." He also
admitted he had bought the People's World on
newsstands "to find out what they were hatch-
ing up."
Unfortunately, the employee failed to request
a hearing and the matter was speedily disposed
of by the departmental loyalty board. His neglect
to ask for a hearing, in the Union's opinion, can
be charged to a lack of understanding of the
proceedings and a total absence of advice until
the time to request a hearing has lapsed. The
man is not aggressive, and at the time he re-
ceived the charges had no place to turn for assist-
ance or advice. Incidentally, he receives a salary
of $3025 a year on which he helps support his
mother. He is an honorably discharged veteran
of the last war.
The Union has urged the Secretary of the In-
terior to remand the case to the departmental
Loyalty Board for a hearing "in order to obtain
a proper record in the case." If that is not pos-
sible, the Union has asked that the man be
granted the privilege of filing affidavits. And,
if neither of these requests can be granted, then
the Union will try to secure Washington counsel
to argue the matter before the Secretary of the
Interior.
)
S. F. Nudist Mag. Distributor
Goes on Trial February 17
Troy Gillespie, operator of the Troy News
Agency, will go on trial before a jury in the San
Francisco Municipal Court on February 17 on a
charge of violating the local obscenity ordinance.
Two members of the police juvenile detail, on
the strength of a search warrant, on January 3
seized 2102 copies of various nudist magazines
and arrested Gillespie. He was released on a
$250 bond posted by the American Civil Liberties
Union.
Attorney James Martin MacInnis, prominent
San Francisco criminal attorney, who success-
fully defended the bookseller in the prosecution
involving "The Memoirs of Hecate County," has
been retained as counsel. His fee is being paid
by the publishers and the magazine distributor.
Among the 2102 seized nudist magazines were
1832 copies of "Sunshine and Health," 250 copies
of "Sunbathing," a reprint of an English maga-
zine, published in Chicago, and "Natural Herald,"
published by Ivan Brovont in Sacramento.
Ernest Besig, local director of the Union, con-
ferred with District Attorney Edmund G. Brown
and urged dismissal of the prosecution, on the
ground that nudist magazines contain no obseene
pictures or text. Mr. Brown was asked to point
out any obscene matter in the magazine but de-
clined to do so.
During Mr. Brown's term of office, unsuccess-
ful obscenity prosecutions have involved the mo-
tion pictures "Furia," "The Outlaw," and "Nar-
cotics," the book "`The Memoirs of Hecate Coun-
ty," and the Sally Rand show.
In 1940, The U. 8. Court of Appeals decided
that the book "Nudism in Modern Life' was not
obscene despite containing the pictures of nudes.
In its opinion, the court stated "It cannot be as-
sumed that nudity is obscene per se and under
all circumstances. ... And, from the teachings of
psychology and sociology, we know that the con-
trary view is held by social scientists.
"Nudity in art has long been recognized as the
reverse of obscene. Art galleries and art cata-
logues contain many nudes, ancient and modern.
Even such a conservative source book as Ency-
clopaedia Brittannica, contains nudes, full front
view, male and female, and nude males and fe-
males pictured together and in physical contact.
"The use of nude figures and photographs in
medical treatises and textbooks is also commonly
practiced today. ... It is apparent, therefore, that
civilization has advanced far enough, at last, to
permit picturization of the human body for
scientific and educational purposes."
ae
C.O. Forced to L
Veteran Furloughed Without
Pay Pending Loyalty Hearing
The Post Office Department on December 7
filed loyalty proceedings against a $212 a month
substitute mail handler at the Rincon Annex Post
Office in San Francisco. On December 29 he was
"furloughed without pay" pending a hearing on
the charges. Obviously his job is not a "sensi-
tive' one, and it is the first Post Office case han-
dled by the Union in which the employee has been
suspended pending a hearing on loyalty charges.
The man served in the Armed Forces for 51%
years and is only 28 years of age. The furlough
works a particular hardship upon him because
his income has been cut off just at a time when
he needs it to take care of his pregnant wife who
is scheduled to have her baby in March.
The employee received an honorable discharge
from the Army on February 11, 1947, and is a
member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Fol-
lowing his discharge, he told the Veterans Admin-
istration he wanted to get some schooling under
the GI Bill of Rights. They discouraged him, how-
ever, on the ground that all the schools were
crowded and he would not be able to enter. He
is a colored boy and has had little schooling.
Nevertheless, another colored boy, who was at-
tending the California Labor School, which is
now on the Attorney General's subversive list,
referred him there and he was accepted on March
17, 1947. When the school was no longer ap-
proved, he quit on July 7, 1947.
In the meantime, however, while attending the
school, he was enrolled in the American Youth
for Democracy, Fillmore branch, the alleged suc-
cessor of the Young Communist League and also
on the Attorney General's subversive list. He
states he paid a dollar for which he received a
membership card, but that he never attended any
meetings. Now the Government is charging this
veteran with disloyalty for briefly attending a
school which it approved, and for paying $1 for
a membership card in an alleged subversive youth
eroup. |
The veteran filled out a set of interrogatories
he received from the Regional Loyalty Board of
the U. S. Civil Service Commission, but failed to
ask for a hearing. And, it was not until early last
month that he came to the Civil Liberties Union
for help.
. The Union immediately requested a hearing
for the man, and because the notice of the loy-
alty proceedings failed to set a time limit to re-
quest a hearing, one has now been granted. The
Union also appealed to the Postmaster General
to reinstate the man in his job pending a final de-
termination of the matter, but received a curt re-
ply from V. C. Burke, First Assistant Postmaster
General, that its letter had been referred to the
Loyalty Board. The man has held his appoint- |
ment as temporary substitute mail handler (he
slings sacks of mail around on the platform at
Rincon Annex) since October 30,1947. _
Late last month, Ernest Besig, the Union's
local director, appeared as counsel in three other
loyalty proceedings. Hearings were held on three
successive days before a three-man panel that
was merely empowered to take testimony and send
that testimony on to Washington for a determi-
nation by the departmental loyalty board. The
testimony was taken on a wire recorder. It would
seem desirable for such a panel to make a recom-
mendation since it has heard the witnesses testify
and is in a position to judge their demeanor on
the stand.
cve
U.C. for Refusing to Drill
Walter Fitch was compelled to drop out of the
`University of California last month because he
refused to take a course in military training in
the ROTC. During his first year in college, Fitch
took such drill, but by the time his second year
came along, he had become a pacifist.
Two weeks before the end of the semester the
Dean of Men gave him the choice of withdrawing
from the University or being dismissed. He with-
drew and plans to attend some other school until
he obtains upper division standing.
Military training is required of all U. C. citi-
zen male students of lower division standing,
under 24, and without certain military creden-
tials. In the '30s, the Civil Liberties Union car-
ried the Hamilton case to the U.S. Supreme
Court in which it was decided that the University
could require such military training.
U. C. has never made any provision for con-
scientious objectors, on the ground that it was
not in a position to determine the sincerity of a
student's views. It has been suggested that at
the present time at least, the University ought
to accept the determination of a draft board that |
a student is a sincere conscientious objector. Such
a rule would have to be put into effect by the
Board of Regents.
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS
Page 3
`Customs' Silent About Its Lie
Detector, Truth Serum Tests
Congressman Franck R. Havenner of San
Francisco has undertaken to assist the A. C. L. U.
in securing information about the use of lie de-
tector tests and the, attempted use of truth serum
tests on personnel of the United States Customs
Service in San Francisco. Frank Dow, Acting
Commissioner of Customs in Washington has re-
fused to furnish the Union any information con-
cerning the matter. `The investigation," said
Mr. Dow, "was in connection with an adminis-
trative problem of the Customs Service. Since
you have not established that you represent, as
attorney or otherwise, any of the Customs per-
sonnel concerned, the Bureau is unable to furnish
you any information in the matter."
After receiving vague reports of lie detector
and truth serum tests on reluctant personnel in
the Bureau of Customs in San Francisco, the
Union made an inquiry last year of Paul R. Leake,
local Collector of Customs. He replied that ``the
Customs Agency Service has already given the
lie detector test in investigating the disappear-
ance of a small amount of money. The tests were
taken by the men voluntarily. Mr. Fred Gardner,
who is head of the Customs Agency Service, tells
me that he does not plan to give the truth serum
test."
The Union then inquired as to the circumstanc-
`es under which the lie detector tests were given,
and as to whether the employees were requested
to take the truth serum tests. The Union would
like to know what would have happened to any
employee who refused to take a lie detector test.
It also wanted to know whether such investiga-
tory procedures "have specific approval from
Washington, or whether you are proceeding un-
der general authority." If there were written
regulations governing the matter, the Union
wanted to examine them.
The local Customs officials declined to answer
these questions, as did the Acting Commissioner
of Customs. The Union has informed Mr. Dow
that "the public is entitled to know how its busi-
ness is being run. Asa matter of fact, the Union's
local committee has not yet taken a position on
the main issue and is waiting to obtain full in-
formation before doing so."
a
ACLU Protests Detroit =
Loyalty Oaths for Reporters
The ACLU last month protested the ruling of
the police commissioner of Detroit that news-
papermen must file loyalty certificates in order
to obtain police cards. In a letter to Police Com-
missioner Harry 8S. Toy, the Union said, "We
can hardly conceive of any action which more
immediately strikes at freedom of the press than
the one you propose.
"The security of the Nation will not be en-
hanced by any such arbitrary orders which in
effect subjugate journalists to the whims and
fancies of local police authorities. ... What may
be permissible for a department of the Govern-
- ment, whose function necessarily involves reten-
tion of information and material whose dis-
closure might operate to our country's disadvan-
tage, is not to be construed as a license to every
local police official to install a system which in
the guise of patriotism is of the essence of cen-
sorship and thereby `un-American.'
"We are calling upon all elements of the press
to resist your order. We trust that you will see
fit to revoke it." The Union pointed out that if
Toy succeeds in enforcing his order, police and
fire reporters would be in danger of police retalia-
tion if they write anything uncomplimentary and
a controlled press by local officials could be the
eventual result."
@
Baraona Gase Hearing
Postponed Until April 10
Argument on the motion of Rafael L. Baraona
to dismiss the indictment pending against him
in the Federal Court in San Francisco has been
postponed until April 10.
Baraona was indicted last October 28 on a
charge of securing his former federal job by
fraud. In filling out Standard Form 57, he denied
that he had ever been a member of any organ-
ization that advocates the overthrow of the gov- -
ernment by force and violence. The government
claims he did belong to such a group because he
subsequently admitted he had been a member of
the Communist Party. On the other hand, no
court has as yet held that the Communist Party
advocates the violent overthrow of the govern-
ment. That matter may be determined in the
sedition trial now in progress in the federal court
in New York City.
Baraona continues at liberty on $1000 bail
posted by the American Civil Liberties Union.
A Survey of Proposals
Liberties Introducec
(Continued from Page 1)
zations that are oo), communist, fascist
or subversive .
And, lastly, S. B. 300 declares any building in
which subversive organizations hold meetings to
constitute a nuisance, which shall be abated.
The Union has not yet received other bills noted
in the public press which Senator Tenney has in-
troduced on the subject of "subversive activities."'
Included in the lot is a measure empowering labor
unions to expel Communists, another allowing
employees to discharge or refuse employment to
Communists, and a third establishing loyalty
checks for State employees.
In the field of race relations, Assemblyman
Maloney and Mrs. Niehouse have introduced
A. B. 739 to establish a race relations commis-
sion to investigate and do educational work.
$50,000 would be appropriated for the Commis-
sion.
Mr. Elliott has introduced A. B. 821 making it
a crime to place racial restrictive covenants in
property agreements, and A. B. 451 would repeal
the sections of the Civil Code prohibiting mis-
cegenous marriages which have already been held
unconstitutional by the California Supreme Court.
Three measures have been introduced to elimi-
nate segregation in the National Guard. A. B. 807
has the names of 18 legislators on it. A. B. 151
is the same measure, while Assembly Constitu-
tional Amendment No. 2 by Augustus Hawkins
would solve the problem by adopting a constitu-
tional amendment.
Two bills would make it a punishable offense
for insurers to require colored people to pay more
for automobile insurance that others. A. B. 22
has the names of nineteen assemblymen as co-
authors. A. B. 32 was introduced by Messrs.
Hawkins and Rumford.
Assemblyman Rosenthal is responsible for a
couple of bills, on which he has other authors
which are designed to eliminate race and religious
hatred. A. B. 403 would make it an offense to say
anything against any religious faith, while A. B.
529 would make it unlawful for any person or
persons to disseminate hatred against any person
or group because of his race or religion. . In pre-
vious sessions of the State Legislature Mr. Ten-
ney introduced bills of this kind which were
defeated.
Finally there is a miscellaneous group of bills
which cover various subjects. A. B. 131 by Elliott
and others would establish a Division of Inspec-
Comic Book Ordinance
To Be Considered February 1
The City Council of Turlock is scheduled to
consider a comic book ordinance on February 1
which contains all of the faults of comic book
ordinances proposed in San Francisco, Sacra-
mento and other communities, besides a couple
that the Union has never seen before.
The proposal would make it unlawful to fur-
nish to any person under the age of eighteen
years any. publication in which there is "promi-
nently featured" (whatever that is) an account
of crime, etc. That is the mildest provision of the
proposal copied from ordinances proposed in
other cities.
Another section of the ordinance makes it a
crime to furnish such a minor "any newspapers,
_pamphlets or other printed paper devoted to the
7
publication of criminal news, police reports, or
criminal deeds . . ." While newspapers are speci-
fically exempted from the terms of this proposal,
it would apply to detective stories and books dis-
tributed by newsdealers and libraries. Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle's stories could not be furnished to
children under the age of eighteen.
Possibly the most fantastic section of the pro-
posal makes it an offense to "exhibit upon any
public street or highway or other public place or
any other place within the view of children pass-
ing on any public street or highway or frequent-
ing any public place any book, pamphlet or other .
printed paper or thing devoted to the publication
of criminal news, police reports or crimirial deeds."
This ordinance is sponsored by the Ministerial
Association of Turlock, the chairman of which is
the Rev. A. Axel Anderson. The Union wrote to
Mr. Anderson, pointing out how the proposal
violates the freedom of the press, but failed to
receive a response.
The proposal was presented for adoption at
the Council meeting on January 4, but a motion
to that effect failed to receive a second. A mo-
tion was then adopted to table the matter until
the Council meeting on February 1. The ACLU
has filed an argument with the Council opposing
the eae
in the Cal
Affecting
: Legislature
tion in the Department of Justice to investigate
and. prosecute violations of "civil rights and bru-
tality." A. B. 160 bearing the names of more than
half of the Assemblymen would guarantee women
equal pay for equal work in private employment.
A. B. 264 would make it an offense to employ
aliens subject to deportation. This is a foolish
bill because such aliens are often eligible for sus--
pension of deportation and their families would
suffer if they were not permitted to work.
A. B. 677 provides that "In all public schools, -
at least five minutes daily shall be devoted to
reading aloud from the Bible, without comment."
The passages would be selected by the State
Board of Education, with the advice of the three
principal faiths. Pupils could be excused from
attendance at such readings upon the written ap-
plication of their parents or guardians, and the in-
struction would allegedly not be sectarian.
Lastly, Assemblyman Thompson of San Jose
has introduced A. B. 833. which would make it a
misdemeanor for the operator of a nudist camp
to admit minors, or for the parents of such minors
to take them to such camps.
Copies of the bills mentioned above may be se-
cured from the Legislative Bill Room, Capitol,
Sacramento, Calif.
6
Flavenner's Libel Suit Against |
Hearst Ignored by Press
On December 28, 1948, a libel suit was filed by
Congressman Franck R. Havenner of San Fran-
cisco against the Hearst Publishing Company.
The matter was virtually ignored by the daily
press.
The suit was filed in the federal district court
in San Francisco, because the company is in- -
corporated in another state. The suit seeks dam-
ages in the sum of $350,000 for an article that
appeared in the San Francisco Examiner in the
final days of the Congressional election, on Oc-
tober 26, 1948. Two days later Mr. Havenner
demanded a retraction, but a weasel-worded re-
traction was not published until after the elec-
tion, even though there was plenty of time to do
so before the election.
The story in question was headed, "A Vote for
Havenner Is A Vote for Bridges." The story
went on to say, "Some of the political elements
which tried to conceal Franck Havenner's Com-
munist and pinko support in the mayoralty cam-
`paign are now trying to alibi what cannot be
concealed any longer. Havenner again is the
candidate of the Communists and of Harry
Bridges and of all the factions that the Commu- -
nists and Bridges represent. . . . In this election
the voters of the Fourth Congressional District,
by eliminating Franck Havenner from Congress,
can strike a double blow at Bridges and the Com-
munist followers of Bridges and Havenner.
"A vote for Havenner is a vote for Bridges
and the Kremlin."
The San Francisco News was the only daily
paper that carried any notice of the suit, and
that was only a small paragraph on an inside
page. The San Francisco Chronicle managing
editor agreed with the Union that the suit was
news, but they did not want to encourage libel
suits against newspapers.
There is no question of freedom of the press
in connection with this suppression of the news.
The press is private and can print what it
chooses, but at the same time it should be re-
minded that it is hardly in a position to cry out
against suppression of news by the government,
as it has, if it also practices suppression of the
news. It is in the interest of a free press to print
all of the news, even the kind that the press does
not like.
ee
Appeal Attempt to Restore
Armenian Children to Parents
The American Civil Liberties Union last month
joined the fight to uphold the right of a father
to retain custody of his children. The Union
entered a brief as `friend of the court' in the
Appellate Division of the New York County
Supreme Court, where a father is attempting to
have his three children released from two Roman
Catholic institutions in New York and restored
to him in Soviet Armenia. The five-judge court
is expected to render a decision soon.
The case concerns three children, seven `to
fourteen years old, of Hamportzoon Choolokian,
a fifty-year-old shoemaker who abandoned his
naturalized U. S. citizenship and returned to his
native Soviet Armenia in November, 1947. The
case, according to the Union, involves the right (c)
of parents to the custody of their children as
against the claims of institutions.
0x00B0
Page 4
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS
American Civil Liberties Union-News
Published monthly at 461 Market St., San Francisco 5,
Calif., by the American Civil Liberties Union
of Northern California.
Phone: EXbrook 2-3255
ERNEST BESIG Editor
Entered as second-class matter, July 31, 1941, at the
Post Office at San Francisco, California,
under the Act of March 3, 1879
Subscription Rates-One Dollar a Year.
Ten Cents per Copy
Union Condemns
Communist Sedition Trial
The trial of twelve Communist leaders in the
U. S. District Court in New York set for January
17, was scored last month in a statement by the
American Civil Liberties Union as "an unwar-
ranted use of the only peace-time sedition law
in American history since 1798."" A conviction,
the Union said, would "drive the entire Commu-
nist movement in this country underground."
The Union, which will take no part in the trial,
announced that in the event of convictions, it
would offer its aid to the defense "solely on the
constitutional issue of the sedition act of 1940."
Roger N. Baldwin, director of the American
Civil Liberties Union, stated that "the Union is
in no way sympathetic with the Communist Party
but is acting entirely in the interests of civil
liberties for all Americans."
Baldwin stated that the Union had also op-
posed the only other use of the 1940 act when
a group of `Trotskyites'' were prosecuted' in
Minneapolis in 1941 and when "an asserted group
of pre-war alleged Nazi sympathizers" were tried
in Washington, D. C., in 1942 and 1943.
The so-called Trotskyites were convicted and
the U. S. Supreme Court three times refused to
review the case. The case against the alleged
Nazi sympathizers was dropped after a mistrial
due to the death of the presiding judge. The
Union noted that the Communist Party "while
bitterly opposing the present prosecutions, vigor-
ously supported the government's efforts to jail
their opponents in the other two cases."
In his statement Mr. Baldwin said: "The gov-
ernment's prosecution of twelve Communist lead-
ers under the sedition act of 1940 rests solely on
the utterances and publications of the Communist
Party. Not a single overt act of any sort is
charged. The Party is held by the indictment
to be a conspiracy to accomplish unlawful objects.
Those objects, whose advocacy is made criminal
by the 1940 act, are the overthrow of govern-
ment by violence and incitement to disaffection
in the armed forces.
"Tt has always been the position of our courts,
`as well as sound policy, that no language, pub-
lications or propaganda are punishable unless
they constitute a clear and present danger of
unlawful acts. The Supreme Court has held that
the danger must be great and the prospect of
action immediate to justify the penalties on free-
dom of speech and press. Nothing in the indict-
ments suggests any such danger. They are based
on what the Communists have for years been
advocating. :
"The Civil Liberties Union is wholly opposed
to the entire Communist political philosophy of
police-state dictatorship. It excludes Commu-
nists, among other anti-democratic forces, from
its councils. But it is also opposed to restricting
the freedom of Communist propaganda in the
absence of unlawful acts. It takes that position,
not only on the ground of legal rights but also
on the practical ground that it is far better for
a democracy to encourage such movements to
operate in the open than to drive them into
secret underground channels.
"The effect of the government's prosecution,
if successful, will be to drive the whole Commu-
nist movement underground in this country, for
the Party itself would be held an unlawful con-
spiracy. In the interest of our traditional Amer-
ican principles of freedom of speech and press,
`even for the thought we hate,' the Union will use
its efforts to prevent any such result."
(c))
"Objectors' Given 3-Month Sentences
For Refusal to Register for Draft
Robert S. McInnes, 21-year-old theological
student at the Pacific School of Religion, was
sentenced to three months in the County Jail by
Federal Judge Michael J. Roche on January 13
for refusing to register for the draft.
Bob Meyners, co-pastor of the San Francisco
Fellowship Church of All Peoples, who also re-
fused to register for the draft, was likewise sen-
tenced to three months in the San Francisco
county jail. His case was heard by Federal Judge
Louis Goodman on January 6.
The sentences given McInnes and Meyners com-
pare favorably with the harsh three-year sen- .
tences given to four members of peace churches
by Federal Judge Pierson Hall in Los Angeles.
Oakland City Council -
Kills FEPC Proposal
The Oakland City Council last month practically
killed a proposed FEPC ordinance. On January
5 the Council, by a vote of 5 to 4, defeated the
proposal, but then referred it to a vote of the
people at the April municipal primary election.
Finally, on January 25, the Council voted to
rescind its previous action on advice of the city
attorney, because of legal technicalities.
The proposal made racial discrimination in
city employment or employment on municipal
contracts a misdemeanor punishable by a $500
fine or six months in prison. It provided for a
Commission of three members, to be appointed
by the Mayor with the approval of the City
Council. The Commission was empowered to in-
vestigate complaints of such racial discrimina-
tion and either adjust them or to recommend
prosecution.
ee
ACLU Adopts Statement
On Defense Principles
In order to clarify the use of words such as
"Fascism" and "Communism" in relation to civil
liberties, the Board of Directors of the Union
agreed last month on a statement' making clear
that it takes no position on practices which do not
affect civil liberties. The statement reads:
"The ACLU as a champion of civil liberties is
opposed to any governmental or economic sys-
tem which denies fundamental civil liberties and
human rights. It is therefore opposed to any form
of the police state or the single-party state, or
any movement in support of them, whether fas-
cist, Communist, or known by any other name.
In opposing those dictatorial, totalitarian sys-
tems, the ACLU takes no position on their eco-
nomic, social or political practices or policies not
affecting civil liberties."
ee
In Recognition of
The Board of Directors of the ACLU at its
first meeting following the death of Laurence
Duggan voted a resolution of appreciation of his
services to the cause of civil liberties as a mem-
ber of the Union's Board of Directors and as
chairman of its Committee on Civil Rights in
American Colonies.
The Board noted that Mr. Duggan since his
retirement from the State Department had been
"`a devoted supporter of the principles of civil
liberties" and had assisted particularly in the
problems affecting the civil rights of the natives
of the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico and the Virgin
Islands. Mr. Duggan served as a member of the
Union's Board of Directors from 1947 to the
fall of 1948. He resigned because of the press of
official duties as director of the International
Institute of Education.
New York Court Clears
United Nations Pickets
The Appellate Term of New York City's Spe-
cial Sessions Court on January 4 reversed the
conviction of six men who picketed a United
Nations luncheon at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
in October, 1946. The American Civil Liberties
Union paid court costs for the appeal.
The six men were part of a larger group of
men and women who carried posters outside the
Waldorf-Astoria protesting U. S. membership
in the United Nations. They belonged to a "Com-
mittee for Non-violent Revolution," a pacifist or-
ganization claiming that this country will be
drawn closer to another war through United
Nations involvement.
---__-- 8 -__-_-
New York City Board of Education
Bars IWO From Schools
The New York City Board of Education on
January 20, with six of its nine members present,
took the unprecedented step of barring from the
use of public school rooms classes in Jewish
culture organized by the International Workers
Order solely because that organization is on the
Attorney General's `subversive list." The Board
had in 1947 refused to pass a resolution barring
the use of schools to `Nazi, Fascist and Com-
munist agencies." The ACLU, through its New
York City Committee, had urged the Board to
adhere to the principle expressed in its previous
resolution, pointing out that the Attorney Gen-
eral's list was prepared only in relation to fed-
eral employment and without giving organiza-
tions the chance to contest "arbitrary findings."
It is likely that the issue will be taken into the
courts.
Supreme Court Hears Hawaii
Foreign Language Case
The constitutionality of a Hawaiian law pro-
hibiting children from studying foreign languages
was challenged last week in the U. S. Supreme
Court. The case, in which Hawaiian government
authorities appealed a district court decision de-
claring the law unconstitutional, involved a Chi-
nese language school. :
The original case was brought against Hawaiian
authorities by Mo Hock Ke Lok Po, an official
of the Chinese language school. The law pro-
hibited teaching of any language other than Eng-
lish to children under the fifth grade who had
not passed standard English requirements. The
law claimed to protect children from `serious
emotional disturbances, conflicts and maladjust-
ments."
The ACLU in a brief in the Supreme Court con-
tended that parents have a constitutional right
to send their children to schools of their choice
and that by implication the law threatens ``the
teaching of biology, the theory of evolution, in-
deed the truths of the equality of man and in
many cases the basic tenets upon which the na-
tion was founded." The ACLU brief was written
by Osmond K. Fraenkel, counsel and member of
the Union's board of directors.
Puerto Rico Spanish
Language Issue Settled
A controversy of long standing over the im-
position of English as the language of instruction
in Puerto Rican schools came to an end last
month following the inauguration of the Island's
first elected governor, Luis Munoz Marin, when
his new Commissioner of Education ordered that
all instruction should be in Spanish, with English
as a compulsory study from the lower grades up.
Several years ago the Puerto Rican legislature
passed a bill to the same effect but it was vetoed
by President Truman. A contest in the courts
over the validity of the veto was terminated
_ when the change of the Island's governorship was
j,imminent. The new Commissioner of Education,
Laurence Duggan t
Marino Villaronga, whose nomination had pre-
viously been rejected by the U. 8S. Senate, had
long been committed to the principle of teaching
in Spanish. Under the new law, the commissioner
is appointed by the governor.
The ACLU supported throughout the proceed-
ings in the courts and before the President the
principle of teaching in the native language.
ACLU Comments on Supreme
Court Closed Shop Decision
The Supreme Court decision announced on
January 3 upholding state anti-closed shop laws
leaves open only to Congress the power to permit
closed union shops, according to comment of
ACLU lawyers. The Court rejected arguments
that the anti-closed shop laws strike at freedom
of contract of both unions and employers, and up-
held the right of workers not to join unions to
obtain employment.
The ACLU position has been that closed shop
contracts do not violate civil liberties if unions
are open freely to workers without discrimina-
tion, at reasonable dues and with assurance of.
democratic rights to members. The Union is
opposed to closed shops where those conditions
are not met, but not to their general outlawry.
It is expected that the tactics of the trade
unions will be to turn to Congress to make pos-
sible in interstate industry what the Supreme
Court has outlawed within the states. The ACLU
will exert its efforts to attach to any such legis-
lation conditions protecting the rights of trade
union members. 3
MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION
American Civil Liberties Union of No. CaHf..
461 Market Street,
San Francisco 5, Calif.
1. Please enroll me as a member at dues of
Sos for the current year. (Types of mem-
bership: Associate Member, $3; Annual Mem-
ber, $5; Business and Professional Member,
$10; Family Membership, $25; Contributing
Member, $50; Patron, $100 and over. Mem-
bership includes subscription to the `American
Civil Liberties Union-News" at $1 a year.)
. I pledge 0x00A7............ per month a or $2. per yr.
. Please enter my subscription to the NEWS, $1
per year)... oe
Hnelosed please find $..=.. Please bill
City and Zone