vol. 14, no. 2

Primary tabs

American


Civil


Union-News


Liberties


Free Assemb


Free Speec! :


lage


"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty."


Vol. XIV


SAN FRANCISCO, FEBRUARY, 1949


No. 2


ene gee


poi


Tenney Promises Reforms


In "Red Hunt' Procedures


Senator Jack B. Tenney has promised to reform


his red hunting State Senate Committee on un-


American Activities, according to a story in the


January 19 issue of the San Francisco News


written by its star political reporter, Mary Ellen


Leary.


"The chief point on which the senator agreed


his committee has erred," says Miss Leary, "is


in smearing persons who have never been formal-


ly charged with any wrong-doing or tracked


down by his committee, but have been named


haphazardly for `questionable' alliances on which


they have never had a chance to testify.


""Names that some witnesses brought out, or


names that appeared on letterheads, or names


that just popped into testimony have sometimes


been smeared in public opinion because they came


out in our report, Senator Tenney is quoted as


saying.


" "We have gotten the largest amount of criti-


cism for this. I personally think it's a meritorious


eriticism, | oS


Hereafter, the committee plans to make a very


careful separation of its "report,'' which contains


opinions and judgments which the committee


forms on persons related to un-Americanism, and


the testimony offered on which that report is


based. "We're going to ignore the whoie letter


head brigade of Communist fronts," Sen. Tenney


is reported as saying.


All persons named in testimony hereafter will


have a transcript of such testimony sent to them


and a chance to put their reply in the record.


The Tenney committee does not intend to per-


mit cross-examination because the senator con-


siders Communists "would abuse the privilege."


As for granting a witness the right to consult


- eounsel when before his committee, Senator Ten-


ney says that is followed now.


oo


Suits Filed to Stop Summary


Removal of 2 Issei to Japan


Writs of habeas corpus were filed in the


federal court in San Francisco on January 13


in behalf of two Issei who were taken into


custody by the Immigration Service for removal


to Japan as "dangerous enemy aliens." The


petitions will not be heard until March 7. In the


meantime, Judge Michael J. Roche has ordered


the men freed pending a final determination of


their cases so that they may return to their


homes.


The suits were brought by Frank Y. Miyazawa,


Seattle business man, and Makio Kobayashi, Og-


den laundrymen. The men are represented by at-


torneys Wayne M. Collins, George Olshausen and


Theodore Tamba of San Francisco.


The Government is proceeding under the Alien


Enemy Act of 1797, which permits the President


to arrest and summarily deport enemy aliens


during wartime. Last year, the U. S. Supreme


Court, in a 5 to 4 decision, held that the operation


of the Act does not end with the cessation of


hostilities.


Kobayashi has resided in this country since


August 21, 1919. Miyazawa has resided here


since February 9, 1909.


The two men are the last of a group of 59


Japanese long-time legal residents of the United


States, who were interned during the war. Mr.


Collins negotiated the release of 20 men (many


with families) who had been interned for six


years. The removal of the remaining 39 was


stayed by the filing of a habeas corpus suit in the


federal court in Philadelphia. Thereafter, the


Government released another dozen internees,


and the remaining 27 were paroled into the cus-


tody of Mr. Collins while the Philadelphia case


was pending on appeal. Last fall, the Justice


Department finally ordered the release of all but


Kobayashi and Miyazawa, and the Philadelphia


suit was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.


A Survey of Proposals Affecting Civil


Liberties Introduced in the Cal. Legislature


Civil liberties bills at the current session of


the California Legislature fall into three catego-


ries - red-hunting bills, race relations measures


and a miscellaneous group of proposals. The


good bills are essentially in the racial field.


This survey does not undertake to cover the


bills introduced during the last week of the first


session of the Legislature which has adjourned


until March. Since there is a veritable deluge of


bills introduced during the last week of the first


session, the following article can only give about


half of the picture at this point.


Also, in submitting this information, it should


be borne in mind that the Union's Executive Com-


mittee has not had an opportunity to pass upon


the various measures, so any opinions expressed


are merely those of the writer of this article.


Alleged Racial Discrimination


By Draft Board Probed


The ACLU of Northern California is trying to


find out whether the Placer County Selective


Board at Auburn, California, is engaging in racial


discrimination in making its draft calls. Thus


far, nine men have been inducted into the Army


from that Board, of whom eight were of Japanese


ancestry.


The State Director of the Selective Service


System, Col. K. H. Leitch, in response to the


Union's request for an investigation, declared,


"We have looked into the matter and find no


irregularities and no departure from the Regu-


lations." -


The Union requested a further examination of


the matter, in view of the fact that Placer County


does not have a preponderance of Japanese in its


population, and especially because Placer County


at one time had the reputation of being violently


anti-Japanese in its sentiments. The Union asked


to be supplied with the total registration of


the board as well as the number of Japanese


registrants.


Col. Charles F. Going, Deputy State Director


of Selective Service, late last month advised the


Union that `the total registration. for Local


Board No. 17 is two thousand four hundred sixty-


one, of whom nine have been inducted. Hight


were of Japanese ancestry and the ninth was not.


Of the one hundred forty-five registrants of


Japanese ancestry in that local board, seventeen


are in I-A, ninety-five are deferred or exempted,


twenty-four are unclassified, and as stated above,


eight were inducted and one other enlisted. The


local board so far has ordered forty-five regis-


trants for pre-induction physical examination, of


which twenty-one were of Japanese ancestry and


twenty-four were not.


"As stated in our previous correspondence,"


said Col. Going, `"`we see no evidence whatsoever


of the board's having acted arbitrarily or capri-


ciously. The explanation appears to lie in the fact


-that there was a preponderance of registrants


of Japanese ancestry in the older age groups from


which the board is bound to make its first selec-


tions."


Section 631.7 of the Selective Service regula-


tions provides that registrants shall be selected


and ordered to report for induction in the order


of their dates of birth, with the oldest being


selected first. The Board in question has seven


Nisei who were born in 1922, twenty-seven who


were born in 1923, twenty who were born in 1924,


and twenty-two who were korn in 1925.


General Lewis B. Hershey, national director of


the Selective Service System, has also been re-


quested to investigate the matter. On the basis


of the available information, it is still not clear


why eight out of nine of the board's inductees


were persons of Japanese ancestry, unless there


were practically no Caucasians in the 1922 and


1923 age groups who were subject to induction.


-and Stalin. ~


Senator Jack B. Tenney of Los Angeles, has


introduced his usual quota of red-hunting bills.


Heading the list, of course, is a resolution to


extend the life of the Senate Committee on un-


American Activities for another two years. This


year, however, he has asked for the fantastic


sum of $150,000 with which to finance the com-


mittee's operations-more than the Committee


has spent to this point since its creation on Janu-


ary 21, 1941. Mr. Tenney, no doubt, will be ready


to settle for $100,000, which would still be $5500


more than committee's of this type have cost


during the eight years of their existence.


Assemblyman Elliott and others have intro-


duced Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 6


lambasting the Tenney Committee and declaring


it to be a legislative policy to discontinue such


committees, and to refer matters of subversive


activities to law enforcement agencies.


Seven bills have been introduced on the sub-


ject of loyalty oaths and loyalty checks. A. B. 255


requires all public employees to take loyalty oaths.


Senator Tenney and ten of his supporters have


introduced S. B. 280 which would require public


employees to file an affidavit every year declar-


ing they were not Communists.


Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 13 calls


upon members of the Legislature voluntarily to


file affidavits declaring that they are not Com-


munists, and under a proposed constitutional


amendment No. 14, introduced by Senator Tenney


and others, all public officials would be required


to take an oath that they were not Communists


and that they did `not openly or secretly sup-


port any organization which advocates, advises


or practices the political theories of Marx, Lenin


Assembly Constitutional Amend-


ment No. 32 proposed by Mr. Butters and others


is similar to that of Mr. Tenney's.


Another one of Senator Tenney's bills, S. B. 132,


would require all candidates for public office to


swear that they had not "at any time within the


five years next preceding the making of this


declaration, advocated, promulgated, taught or


practiced the communism of Marx, Lenin and


Stalin.


Finally, applicants for the State bar and law-


yers would be subject to a loyalty check and,


after a hearing, could be denied membership in


the State bar.


Another series of bills introduced by Senator


Tenney is also aimed at "subversive activities."


S. B. 129 defines what is communism and what


is a "communist." For example, anybody who


attended a meeting where communism was ad-


vocated would be a communist.


S. B. 1380 would make it a crime ``to teach com-


munism, nazism, fascism, or any other system or


plan of government ... with intent to indoctri-


nate any pupil..." If such a bill were adopted,


it would become mighty dangerous to mention


anything about these subjects in a classroom.


S. B. 297 would "require public records of at-


tendance to be had of secret meetings of organi-


(Continued on Page 3, Column 2)


;


Final Action in Nisei Citizenship `


Renunciation Cases Set for Feb. 25


Federal Judge Louis Goodman of San Fran-


cisco on January 25 granted the Justice Depart-


ment until February 25 in which to designate the


names of those Nisei renunciants it claims ``acted


freely and voluntarily" in renouncing their U. S.


citizenship. It seems highly improbable that


Judge Goodman will grant the Government a


further extension on February 25, but that he


will sign the final order restoring citizenship to


the Nisei who renounced under duress. Attorney


Wayne M. Collins of San Francisco represents


more than five thousand renunciants involved


in the case.


Page 2


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS


Union Urges D.A. to Prosecute


Brutal S.F. Police Officers


The ACLU last month urged District Attorney


Edmund G. Brown of San Francisco to file crim-


inal charges against two police officers who are


charged with brutally beating one Stewart Bring-


hurst. The officers have been suspended from


their jobs pending a hearing before the Police


Commission, which may result in disciplinary


action.


The police officers defended themselves by


stating that such "workings over" were a com-


mon practice on San Francisco's waterfront. This


led the Union to request "a broad investigation


into police practices in San Francisco." :


The Union's letter to District Attorney Brown


reminded him that the Union's Executive Com-


mittee had recently adopted a resolution `"pro-


testing the inaction of your office in alleged


police brutality cases. While we are not unmind-


ful that such cases present difficult problems for


the prosecutor," the letter went on to say, `"`we


are not convinced that your office has taken


proper action to end lawless enforcement of the


- law by police officers in San Francisco."


The District Attorney recently stated to Ernest


Besig, the Union's director, that there is no police


- brutality problem in San Francisco. The Union


contended that recent occurrences "would appear


to cast serious doubt upon the accuracy of your


conclusions."


In answering the letter, Mr. Brown gave as-


surances that his office would `not in the slight-


est degree tolerate police brutality." At the same


time, he suggested that the problem was properly


one for the Police Department. `"They are charged


' with the duty of investigating all crimes, whether


committed by policemen or anyone else. If they


fail to act, then this office is willing to move into


the picture."


In the present case, Mr. Brown stated, "I think


it is far wiser to await the outcome of the Police


Commission hearing, and if they fail to act we


can proceed by criminal complaint. I have sug-


gested such a procedure to the attorney for the


complaining witness. If he does not believe that


this course is advisable, I am quite willing to re-


_ consider."" My. Brown believes the hearing before


the Police Commission will be speedily disposed of.


In certain police brutality cases that arose last


fall, the Union brought the complainants to the


District Attorney's office. They were ready to


sign complaints but nothing was ever done despite


the urging of the Union. The same lack of inter-


est was shown by the District Attorney's office


in the case of Constantine Theodus, which arose


the latter part of September.


It appears to be a common practice for the


San Francisco Police Department to whitewash


police brutality cases. When cases arise, the


police conduct an investigation or "rinky do" as it


is known in the department, and the officers and


the department are thoroughly whitewashed.


-S.F. Police Claim `Traffic


Checks' Are Not 'Road Blocks'


The San Francisco Police Commission last


month denied it has revived its former practice


of setting up "road blocks' to check automobiles


for violations of the Vehicle Code. It claimed it


is merely conducting a "traffic check" in which


"vehicular traffic is required to slow down at a


given location so that the officers may have an


opportunity to observe the conduct of the driver


of the vehicle."


The Union had protested against an alleged


"road block" on December 24 in which 553 auto-


mobiles were inspected. Under the law, motor-


ists are entitled to use the highways "without


interruption or search," unless a public officer


has "probable cause" for believing that the occu-


pants are violating the law. What the Commis-


sion appears to be saying is that requiring auto-


mobiles to slow down for a `"`traffic check' is not


the kind of interruption which the law prohibits.


Last month the Union also received an ac-


knowledgment of its protest against "road blocks"


maintained by the California Highway Patrol.


Commissioner Clifford E. Pterson advised the


Union he was having a study made of the legal


question before deciding the matter.


we CO


Union's First National Conference Now


Scheduled for New York March 19-21


The first national conference of representatives


of the American Civil Liberties Union will be


held in New York City from March 19 to 21.


_ Ernest Besig, the Union's local director, will


attend.


The object of the conference, according to the


Union's national office, is to discuss the position


of the Union in relation to certain debatable


public issues and, particularly, the internal rela-


tionships of the Union's governing bodies, affili-


ates and members.


nae 2


Communist in '30s Ruled


Against in Loyalty Case


The latest loyalty case to come to the attention


of the ACLU of Northern California is that of


an employee of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.


The Interior Department Loyalty Board found


against him and an appeal is presently pending


before the Secretary of the Interior.


It was not charged that the employee was


presently a member of the Communist Party. It


was alleged, however, that he had been a member


of the party in the early '30s; that he signed a


petition to place the party on the ballot; that he


held Communist meetings in his home; that he


loaned the Communists a loud speaker; and that


he purchased copies of the People's World in


1940.


The employee sent a frank answer admitting


membership in the Communist Party for eight


months. "I admit," said he, "to having been


taken in by them for a short time." He also


admitted he had bought the People's World on


newsstands "to find out what they were hatch-


ing up."


Unfortunately, the employee failed to request


a hearing and the matter was speedily disposed


of by the departmental loyalty board. His neglect


to ask for a hearing, in the Union's opinion, can


be charged to a lack of understanding of the


proceedings and a total absence of advice until


the time to request a hearing has lapsed. The


man is not aggressive, and at the time he re-


ceived the charges had no place to turn for assist-


ance or advice. Incidentally, he receives a salary


of $3025 a year on which he helps support his


mother. He is an honorably discharged veteran


of the last war.


The Union has urged the Secretary of the In-


terior to remand the case to the departmental


Loyalty Board for a hearing "in order to obtain


a proper record in the case." If that is not pos-


sible, the Union has asked that the man be


granted the privilege of filing affidavits. And,


if neither of these requests can be granted, then


the Union will try to secure Washington counsel


to argue the matter before the Secretary of the


Interior.


)


S. F. Nudist Mag. Distributor


Goes on Trial February 17


Troy Gillespie, operator of the Troy News


Agency, will go on trial before a jury in the San


Francisco Municipal Court on February 17 on a


charge of violating the local obscenity ordinance.


Two members of the police juvenile detail, on


the strength of a search warrant, on January 3


seized 2102 copies of various nudist magazines


and arrested Gillespie. He was released on a


$250 bond posted by the American Civil Liberties


Union.


Attorney James Martin MacInnis, prominent


San Francisco criminal attorney, who success-


fully defended the bookseller in the prosecution


involving "The Memoirs of Hecate County," has


been retained as counsel. His fee is being paid


by the publishers and the magazine distributor.


Among the 2102 seized nudist magazines were


1832 copies of "Sunshine and Health," 250 copies


of "Sunbathing," a reprint of an English maga-


zine, published in Chicago, and "Natural Herald,"


published by Ivan Brovont in Sacramento.


Ernest Besig, local director of the Union, con-


ferred with District Attorney Edmund G. Brown


and urged dismissal of the prosecution, on the


ground that nudist magazines contain no obseene


pictures or text. Mr. Brown was asked to point


out any obscene matter in the magazine but de-


clined to do so.


During Mr. Brown's term of office, unsuccess-


ful obscenity prosecutions have involved the mo-


tion pictures "Furia," "The Outlaw," and "Nar-


cotics," the book "`The Memoirs of Hecate Coun-


ty," and the Sally Rand show.


In 1940, The U. 8. Court of Appeals decided


that the book "Nudism in Modern Life' was not


obscene despite containing the pictures of nudes.


In its opinion, the court stated "It cannot be as-


sumed that nudity is obscene per se and under


all circumstances. ... And, from the teachings of


psychology and sociology, we know that the con-


trary view is held by social scientists.


"Nudity in art has long been recognized as the


reverse of obscene. Art galleries and art cata-


logues contain many nudes, ancient and modern.


Even such a conservative source book as Ency-


clopaedia Brittannica, contains nudes, full front


view, male and female, and nude males and fe-


males pictured together and in physical contact.


"The use of nude figures and photographs in


medical treatises and textbooks is also commonly


practiced today. ... It is apparent, therefore, that


civilization has advanced far enough, at last, to


permit picturization of the human body for


scientific and educational purposes."


ae


C.O. Forced to L


Veteran Furloughed Without


Pay Pending Loyalty Hearing


The Post Office Department on December 7


filed loyalty proceedings against a $212 a month


substitute mail handler at the Rincon Annex Post


Office in San Francisco. On December 29 he was


"furloughed without pay" pending a hearing on


the charges. Obviously his job is not a "sensi-


tive' one, and it is the first Post Office case han-


dled by the Union in which the employee has been


suspended pending a hearing on loyalty charges.


The man served in the Armed Forces for 51%


years and is only 28 years of age. The furlough


works a particular hardship upon him because


his income has been cut off just at a time when


he needs it to take care of his pregnant wife who


is scheduled to have her baby in March.


The employee received an honorable discharge


from the Army on February 11, 1947, and is a


member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Fol-


lowing his discharge, he told the Veterans Admin-


istration he wanted to get some schooling under


the GI Bill of Rights. They discouraged him, how-


ever, on the ground that all the schools were


crowded and he would not be able to enter. He


is a colored boy and has had little schooling.


Nevertheless, another colored boy, who was at-


tending the California Labor School, which is


now on the Attorney General's subversive list,


referred him there and he was accepted on March


17, 1947. When the school was no longer ap-


proved, he quit on July 7, 1947.


In the meantime, however, while attending the


school, he was enrolled in the American Youth


for Democracy, Fillmore branch, the alleged suc-


cessor of the Young Communist League and also


on the Attorney General's subversive list. He


states he paid a dollar for which he received a


membership card, but that he never attended any


meetings. Now the Government is charging this


veteran with disloyalty for briefly attending a


school which it approved, and for paying $1 for


a membership card in an alleged subversive youth


eroup. |


The veteran filled out a set of interrogatories


he received from the Regional Loyalty Board of


the U. S. Civil Service Commission, but failed to


ask for a hearing. And, it was not until early last


month that he came to the Civil Liberties Union


for help.


. The Union immediately requested a hearing


for the man, and because the notice of the loy-


alty proceedings failed to set a time limit to re-


quest a hearing, one has now been granted. The


Union also appealed to the Postmaster General


to reinstate the man in his job pending a final de-


termination of the matter, but received a curt re-


ply from V. C. Burke, First Assistant Postmaster


General, that its letter had been referred to the


Loyalty Board. The man has held his appoint- |


ment as temporary substitute mail handler (he


slings sacks of mail around on the platform at


Rincon Annex) since October 30,1947. _


Late last month, Ernest Besig, the Union's


local director, appeared as counsel in three other


loyalty proceedings. Hearings were held on three


successive days before a three-man panel that


was merely empowered to take testimony and send


that testimony on to Washington for a determi-


nation by the departmental loyalty board. The


testimony was taken on a wire recorder. It would


seem desirable for such a panel to make a recom-


mendation since it has heard the witnesses testify


and is in a position to judge their demeanor on


the stand.


cve


U.C. for Refusing to Drill


Walter Fitch was compelled to drop out of the


`University of California last month because he


refused to take a course in military training in


the ROTC. During his first year in college, Fitch


took such drill, but by the time his second year


came along, he had become a pacifist.


Two weeks before the end of the semester the


Dean of Men gave him the choice of withdrawing


from the University or being dismissed. He with-


drew and plans to attend some other school until


he obtains upper division standing.


Military training is required of all U. C. citi-


zen male students of lower division standing,


under 24, and without certain military creden-


tials. In the '30s, the Civil Liberties Union car-


ried the Hamilton case to the U.S. Supreme


Court in which it was decided that the University


could require such military training.


U. C. has never made any provision for con-


scientious objectors, on the ground that it was


not in a position to determine the sincerity of a


student's views. It has been suggested that at


the present time at least, the University ought


to accept the determination of a draft board that |


a student is a sincere conscientious objector. Such


a rule would have to be put into effect by the


Board of Regents.


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS


Page 3


`Customs' Silent About Its Lie


Detector, Truth Serum Tests


Congressman Franck R. Havenner of San


Francisco has undertaken to assist the A. C. L. U.


in securing information about the use of lie de-


tector tests and the, attempted use of truth serum


tests on personnel of the United States Customs


Service in San Francisco. Frank Dow, Acting


Commissioner of Customs in Washington has re-


fused to furnish the Union any information con-


cerning the matter. `The investigation," said


Mr. Dow, "was in connection with an adminis-


trative problem of the Customs Service. Since


you have not established that you represent, as


attorney or otherwise, any of the Customs per-


sonnel concerned, the Bureau is unable to furnish


you any information in the matter."


After receiving vague reports of lie detector


and truth serum tests on reluctant personnel in


the Bureau of Customs in San Francisco, the


Union made an inquiry last year of Paul R. Leake,


local Collector of Customs. He replied that ``the


Customs Agency Service has already given the


lie detector test in investigating the disappear-


ance of a small amount of money. The tests were


taken by the men voluntarily. Mr. Fred Gardner,


who is head of the Customs Agency Service, tells


me that he does not plan to give the truth serum


test."


The Union then inquired as to the circumstanc-


`es under which the lie detector tests were given,


and as to whether the employees were requested


to take the truth serum tests. The Union would


like to know what would have happened to any


employee who refused to take a lie detector test.


It also wanted to know whether such investiga-


tory procedures "have specific approval from


Washington, or whether you are proceeding un-


der general authority." If there were written


regulations governing the matter, the Union


wanted to examine them.


The local Customs officials declined to answer


these questions, as did the Acting Commissioner


of Customs. The Union has informed Mr. Dow


that "the public is entitled to know how its busi-


ness is being run. Asa matter of fact, the Union's


local committee has not yet taken a position on


the main issue and is waiting to obtain full in-


formation before doing so."


a


ACLU Protests Detroit =


Loyalty Oaths for Reporters


The ACLU last month protested the ruling of


the police commissioner of Detroit that news-


papermen must file loyalty certificates in order


to obtain police cards. In a letter to Police Com-


missioner Harry 8S. Toy, the Union said, "We


can hardly conceive of any action which more


immediately strikes at freedom of the press than


the one you propose.


"The security of the Nation will not be en-


hanced by any such arbitrary orders which in


effect subjugate journalists to the whims and


fancies of local police authorities. ... What may


be permissible for a department of the Govern-


- ment, whose function necessarily involves reten-


tion of information and material whose dis-


closure might operate to our country's disadvan-


tage, is not to be construed as a license to every


local police official to install a system which in


the guise of patriotism is of the essence of cen-


sorship and thereby `un-American.'


"We are calling upon all elements of the press


to resist your order. We trust that you will see


fit to revoke it." The Union pointed out that if


Toy succeeds in enforcing his order, police and


fire reporters would be in danger of police retalia-


tion if they write anything uncomplimentary and


a controlled press by local officials could be the


eventual result."


@


Baraona Gase Hearing


Postponed Until April 10


Argument on the motion of Rafael L. Baraona


to dismiss the indictment pending against him


in the Federal Court in San Francisco has been


postponed until April 10.


Baraona was indicted last October 28 on a


charge of securing his former federal job by


fraud. In filling out Standard Form 57, he denied


that he had ever been a member of any organ-


ization that advocates the overthrow of the gov- -


ernment by force and violence. The government


claims he did belong to such a group because he


subsequently admitted he had been a member of


the Communist Party. On the other hand, no


court has as yet held that the Communist Party


advocates the violent overthrow of the govern-


ment. That matter may be determined in the


sedition trial now in progress in the federal court


in New York City.


Baraona continues at liberty on $1000 bail


posted by the American Civil Liberties Union.


A Survey of Proposals


Liberties Introducec


(Continued from Page 1)


zations that are oo), communist, fascist


or subversive .


And, lastly, S. B. 300 declares any building in


which subversive organizations hold meetings to


constitute a nuisance, which shall be abated.


The Union has not yet received other bills noted


in the public press which Senator Tenney has in-


troduced on the subject of "subversive activities."'


Included in the lot is a measure empowering labor


unions to expel Communists, another allowing


employees to discharge or refuse employment to


Communists, and a third establishing loyalty


checks for State employees.


In the field of race relations, Assemblyman


Maloney and Mrs. Niehouse have introduced


A. B. 739 to establish a race relations commis-


sion to investigate and do educational work.


$50,000 would be appropriated for the Commis-


sion.


Mr. Elliott has introduced A. B. 821 making it


a crime to place racial restrictive covenants in


property agreements, and A. B. 451 would repeal


the sections of the Civil Code prohibiting mis-


cegenous marriages which have already been held


unconstitutional by the California Supreme Court.


Three measures have been introduced to elimi-


nate segregation in the National Guard. A. B. 807


has the names of 18 legislators on it. A. B. 151


is the same measure, while Assembly Constitu-


tional Amendment No. 2 by Augustus Hawkins


would solve the problem by adopting a constitu-


tional amendment.


Two bills would make it a punishable offense


for insurers to require colored people to pay more


for automobile insurance that others. A. B. 22


has the names of nineteen assemblymen as co-


authors. A. B. 32 was introduced by Messrs.


Hawkins and Rumford.


Assemblyman Rosenthal is responsible for a


couple of bills, on which he has other authors


which are designed to eliminate race and religious


hatred. A. B. 403 would make it an offense to say


anything against any religious faith, while A. B.


529 would make it unlawful for any person or


persons to disseminate hatred against any person


or group because of his race or religion. . In pre-


vious sessions of the State Legislature Mr. Ten-


ney introduced bills of this kind which were


defeated.


Finally there is a miscellaneous group of bills


which cover various subjects. A. B. 131 by Elliott


and others would establish a Division of Inspec-


Comic Book Ordinance


To Be Considered February 1


The City Council of Turlock is scheduled to


consider a comic book ordinance on February 1


which contains all of the faults of comic book


ordinances proposed in San Francisco, Sacra-


mento and other communities, besides a couple


that the Union has never seen before.


The proposal would make it unlawful to fur-


nish to any person under the age of eighteen


years any. publication in which there is "promi-


nently featured" (whatever that is) an account


of crime, etc. That is the mildest provision of the


proposal copied from ordinances proposed in


other cities.


Another section of the ordinance makes it a


crime to furnish such a minor "any newspapers,


_pamphlets or other printed paper devoted to the


7


publication of criminal news, police reports, or


criminal deeds . . ." While newspapers are speci-


fically exempted from the terms of this proposal,


it would apply to detective stories and books dis-


tributed by newsdealers and libraries. Sir Arthur


Conan Doyle's stories could not be furnished to


children under the age of eighteen.


Possibly the most fantastic section of the pro-


posal makes it an offense to "exhibit upon any


public street or highway or other public place or


any other place within the view of children pass-


ing on any public street or highway or frequent-


ing any public place any book, pamphlet or other .


printed paper or thing devoted to the publication


of criminal news, police reports or crimirial deeds."


This ordinance is sponsored by the Ministerial


Association of Turlock, the chairman of which is


the Rev. A. Axel Anderson. The Union wrote to


Mr. Anderson, pointing out how the proposal


violates the freedom of the press, but failed to


receive a response.


The proposal was presented for adoption at


the Council meeting on January 4, but a motion


to that effect failed to receive a second. A mo-


tion was then adopted to table the matter until


the Council meeting on February 1. The ACLU


has filed an argument with the Council opposing


the eae


in the Cal


Affecting


: Legislature


tion in the Department of Justice to investigate


and. prosecute violations of "civil rights and bru-


tality." A. B. 160 bearing the names of more than


half of the Assemblymen would guarantee women


equal pay for equal work in private employment.


A. B. 264 would make it an offense to employ


aliens subject to deportation. This is a foolish


bill because such aliens are often eligible for sus--


pension of deportation and their families would


suffer if they were not permitted to work.


A. B. 677 provides that "In all public schools, -


at least five minutes daily shall be devoted to


reading aloud from the Bible, without comment."


The passages would be selected by the State


Board of Education, with the advice of the three


principal faiths. Pupils could be excused from


attendance at such readings upon the written ap-


plication of their parents or guardians, and the in-


struction would allegedly not be sectarian.


Lastly, Assemblyman Thompson of San Jose


has introduced A. B. 833. which would make it a


misdemeanor for the operator of a nudist camp


to admit minors, or for the parents of such minors


to take them to such camps.


Copies of the bills mentioned above may be se-


cured from the Legislative Bill Room, Capitol,


Sacramento, Calif.


6


Flavenner's Libel Suit Against |


Hearst Ignored by Press


On December 28, 1948, a libel suit was filed by


Congressman Franck R. Havenner of San Fran-


cisco against the Hearst Publishing Company.


The matter was virtually ignored by the daily


press.


The suit was filed in the federal district court


in San Francisco, because the company is in- -


corporated in another state. The suit seeks dam-


ages in the sum of $350,000 for an article that


appeared in the San Francisco Examiner in the


final days of the Congressional election, on Oc-


tober 26, 1948. Two days later Mr. Havenner


demanded a retraction, but a weasel-worded re-


traction was not published until after the elec-


tion, even though there was plenty of time to do


so before the election.


The story in question was headed, "A Vote for


Havenner Is A Vote for Bridges." The story


went on to say, "Some of the political elements


which tried to conceal Franck Havenner's Com-


munist and pinko support in the mayoralty cam-


`paign are now trying to alibi what cannot be


concealed any longer. Havenner again is the


candidate of the Communists and of Harry


Bridges and of all the factions that the Commu- -


nists and Bridges represent. . . . In this election


the voters of the Fourth Congressional District,


by eliminating Franck Havenner from Congress,


can strike a double blow at Bridges and the Com-


munist followers of Bridges and Havenner.


"A vote for Havenner is a vote for Bridges


and the Kremlin."


The San Francisco News was the only daily


paper that carried any notice of the suit, and


that was only a small paragraph on an inside


page. The San Francisco Chronicle managing


editor agreed with the Union that the suit was


news, but they did not want to encourage libel


suits against newspapers.


There is no question of freedom of the press


in connection with this suppression of the news.


The press is private and can print what it


chooses, but at the same time it should be re-


minded that it is hardly in a position to cry out


against suppression of news by the government,


as it has, if it also practices suppression of the


news. It is in the interest of a free press to print


all of the news, even the kind that the press does


not like.


ee


Appeal Attempt to Restore


Armenian Children to Parents


The American Civil Liberties Union last month


joined the fight to uphold the right of a father


to retain custody of his children. The Union


entered a brief as `friend of the court' in the


Appellate Division of the New York County


Supreme Court, where a father is attempting to


have his three children released from two Roman


Catholic institutions in New York and restored


to him in Soviet Armenia. The five-judge court


is expected to render a decision soon.


The case concerns three children, seven `to


fourteen years old, of Hamportzoon Choolokian,


a fifty-year-old shoemaker who abandoned his


naturalized U. S. citizenship and returned to his


native Soviet Armenia in November, 1947. The


case, according to the Union, involves the right (c)


of parents to the custody of their children as


against the claims of institutions.


0x00B0


Page 4


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-NEWS


American Civil Liberties Union-News


Published monthly at 461 Market St., San Francisco 5,


Calif., by the American Civil Liberties Union


of Northern California.


Phone: EXbrook 2-3255


ERNEST BESIG Editor


Entered as second-class matter, July 31, 1941, at the


Post Office at San Francisco, California,


under the Act of March 3, 1879


Subscription Rates-One Dollar a Year.


Ten Cents per Copy


Union Condemns


Communist Sedition Trial


The trial of twelve Communist leaders in the


U. S. District Court in New York set for January


17, was scored last month in a statement by the


American Civil Liberties Union as "an unwar-


ranted use of the only peace-time sedition law


in American history since 1798."" A conviction,


the Union said, would "drive the entire Commu-


nist movement in this country underground."


The Union, which will take no part in the trial,


announced that in the event of convictions, it


would offer its aid to the defense "solely on the


constitutional issue of the sedition act of 1940."


Roger N. Baldwin, director of the American


Civil Liberties Union, stated that "the Union is


in no way sympathetic with the Communist Party


but is acting entirely in the interests of civil


liberties for all Americans."


Baldwin stated that the Union had also op-


posed the only other use of the 1940 act when


a group of `Trotskyites'' were prosecuted' in


Minneapolis in 1941 and when "an asserted group


of pre-war alleged Nazi sympathizers" were tried


in Washington, D. C., in 1942 and 1943.


The so-called Trotskyites were convicted and


the U. S. Supreme Court three times refused to


review the case. The case against the alleged


Nazi sympathizers was dropped after a mistrial


due to the death of the presiding judge. The


Union noted that the Communist Party "while


bitterly opposing the present prosecutions, vigor-


ously supported the government's efforts to jail


their opponents in the other two cases."


In his statement Mr. Baldwin said: "The gov-


ernment's prosecution of twelve Communist lead-


ers under the sedition act of 1940 rests solely on


the utterances and publications of the Communist


Party. Not a single overt act of any sort is


charged. The Party is held by the indictment


to be a conspiracy to accomplish unlawful objects.


Those objects, whose advocacy is made criminal


by the 1940 act, are the overthrow of govern-


ment by violence and incitement to disaffection


in the armed forces.


"Tt has always been the position of our courts,


`as well as sound policy, that no language, pub-


lications or propaganda are punishable unless


they constitute a clear and present danger of


unlawful acts. The Supreme Court has held that


the danger must be great and the prospect of


action immediate to justify the penalties on free-


dom of speech and press. Nothing in the indict-


ments suggests any such danger. They are based


on what the Communists have for years been


advocating. :


"The Civil Liberties Union is wholly opposed


to the entire Communist political philosophy of


police-state dictatorship. It excludes Commu-


nists, among other anti-democratic forces, from


its councils. But it is also opposed to restricting


the freedom of Communist propaganda in the


absence of unlawful acts. It takes that position,


not only on the ground of legal rights but also


on the practical ground that it is far better for


a democracy to encourage such movements to


operate in the open than to drive them into


secret underground channels.


"The effect of the government's prosecution,


if successful, will be to drive the whole Commu-


nist movement underground in this country, for


the Party itself would be held an unlawful con-


spiracy. In the interest of our traditional Amer-


ican principles of freedom of speech and press,


`even for the thought we hate,' the Union will use


its efforts to prevent any such result."


(c))


"Objectors' Given 3-Month Sentences


For Refusal to Register for Draft


Robert S. McInnes, 21-year-old theological


student at the Pacific School of Religion, was


sentenced to three months in the County Jail by


Federal Judge Michael J. Roche on January 13


for refusing to register for the draft.


Bob Meyners, co-pastor of the San Francisco


Fellowship Church of All Peoples, who also re-


fused to register for the draft, was likewise sen-


tenced to three months in the San Francisco


county jail. His case was heard by Federal Judge


Louis Goodman on January 6.


The sentences given McInnes and Meyners com-


pare favorably with the harsh three-year sen- .


tences given to four members of peace churches


by Federal Judge Pierson Hall in Los Angeles.


Oakland City Council -


Kills FEPC Proposal


The Oakland City Council last month practically


killed a proposed FEPC ordinance. On January


5 the Council, by a vote of 5 to 4, defeated the


proposal, but then referred it to a vote of the


people at the April municipal primary election.


Finally, on January 25, the Council voted to


rescind its previous action on advice of the city


attorney, because of legal technicalities.


The proposal made racial discrimination in


city employment or employment on municipal


contracts a misdemeanor punishable by a $500


fine or six months in prison. It provided for a


Commission of three members, to be appointed


by the Mayor with the approval of the City


Council. The Commission was empowered to in-


vestigate complaints of such racial discrimina-


tion and either adjust them or to recommend


prosecution.


ee


ACLU Adopts Statement


On Defense Principles


In order to clarify the use of words such as


"Fascism" and "Communism" in relation to civil


liberties, the Board of Directors of the Union


agreed last month on a statement' making clear


that it takes no position on practices which do not


affect civil liberties. The statement reads:


"The ACLU as a champion of civil liberties is


opposed to any governmental or economic sys-


tem which denies fundamental civil liberties and


human rights. It is therefore opposed to any form


of the police state or the single-party state, or


any movement in support of them, whether fas-


cist, Communist, or known by any other name.


In opposing those dictatorial, totalitarian sys-


tems, the ACLU takes no position on their eco-


nomic, social or political practices or policies not


affecting civil liberties."


ee


In Recognition of


The Board of Directors of the ACLU at its


first meeting following the death of Laurence


Duggan voted a resolution of appreciation of his


services to the cause of civil liberties as a mem-


ber of the Union's Board of Directors and as


chairman of its Committee on Civil Rights in


American Colonies.


The Board noted that Mr. Duggan since his


retirement from the State Department had been


"`a devoted supporter of the principles of civil


liberties" and had assisted particularly in the


problems affecting the civil rights of the natives


of the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico and the Virgin


Islands. Mr. Duggan served as a member of the


Union's Board of Directors from 1947 to the


fall of 1948. He resigned because of the press of


official duties as director of the International


Institute of Education.


New York Court Clears


United Nations Pickets


The Appellate Term of New York City's Spe-


cial Sessions Court on January 4 reversed the


conviction of six men who picketed a United


Nations luncheon at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel


in October, 1946. The American Civil Liberties


Union paid court costs for the appeal.


The six men were part of a larger group of


men and women who carried posters outside the


Waldorf-Astoria protesting U. S. membership


in the United Nations. They belonged to a "Com-


mittee for Non-violent Revolution," a pacifist or-


ganization claiming that this country will be


drawn closer to another war through United


Nations involvement.


---__-- 8 -__-_-


New York City Board of Education


Bars IWO From Schools


The New York City Board of Education on


January 20, with six of its nine members present,


took the unprecedented step of barring from the


use of public school rooms classes in Jewish


culture organized by the International Workers


Order solely because that organization is on the


Attorney General's `subversive list." The Board


had in 1947 refused to pass a resolution barring


the use of schools to `Nazi, Fascist and Com-


munist agencies." The ACLU, through its New


York City Committee, had urged the Board to


adhere to the principle expressed in its previous


resolution, pointing out that the Attorney Gen-


eral's list was prepared only in relation to fed-


eral employment and without giving organiza-


tions the chance to contest "arbitrary findings."


It is likely that the issue will be taken into the


courts.


Supreme Court Hears Hawaii


Foreign Language Case


The constitutionality of a Hawaiian law pro-


hibiting children from studying foreign languages


was challenged last week in the U. S. Supreme


Court. The case, in which Hawaiian government


authorities appealed a district court decision de-


claring the law unconstitutional, involved a Chi-


nese language school. :


The original case was brought against Hawaiian


authorities by Mo Hock Ke Lok Po, an official


of the Chinese language school. The law pro-


hibited teaching of any language other than Eng-


lish to children under the fifth grade who had


not passed standard English requirements. The


law claimed to protect children from `serious


emotional disturbances, conflicts and maladjust-


ments."


The ACLU in a brief in the Supreme Court con-


tended that parents have a constitutional right


to send their children to schools of their choice


and that by implication the law threatens ``the


teaching of biology, the theory of evolution, in-


deed the truths of the equality of man and in


many cases the basic tenets upon which the na-


tion was founded." The ACLU brief was written


by Osmond K. Fraenkel, counsel and member of


the Union's board of directors.


Puerto Rico Spanish


Language Issue Settled


A controversy of long standing over the im-


position of English as the language of instruction


in Puerto Rican schools came to an end last


month following the inauguration of the Island's


first elected governor, Luis Munoz Marin, when


his new Commissioner of Education ordered that


all instruction should be in Spanish, with English


as a compulsory study from the lower grades up.


Several years ago the Puerto Rican legislature


passed a bill to the same effect but it was vetoed


by President Truman. A contest in the courts


over the validity of the veto was terminated


_ when the change of the Island's governorship was


j,imminent. The new Commissioner of Education,


Laurence Duggan t


Marino Villaronga, whose nomination had pre-


viously been rejected by the U. 8S. Senate, had


long been committed to the principle of teaching


in Spanish. Under the new law, the commissioner


is appointed by the governor.


The ACLU supported throughout the proceed-


ings in the courts and before the President the


principle of teaching in the native language.


ACLU Comments on Supreme


Court Closed Shop Decision


The Supreme Court decision announced on


January 3 upholding state anti-closed shop laws


leaves open only to Congress the power to permit


closed union shops, according to comment of


ACLU lawyers. The Court rejected arguments


that the anti-closed shop laws strike at freedom


of contract of both unions and employers, and up-


held the right of workers not to join unions to


obtain employment.


The ACLU position has been that closed shop


contracts do not violate civil liberties if unions


are open freely to workers without discrimina-


tion, at reasonable dues and with assurance of.


democratic rights to members. The Union is


opposed to closed shops where those conditions


are not met, but not to their general outlawry.


It is expected that the tactics of the trade


unions will be to turn to Congress to make pos-


sible in interstate industry what the Supreme


Court has outlawed within the states. The ACLU


will exert its efforts to attach to any such legis-


lation conditions protecting the rights of trade


union members. 3


MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION


American Civil Liberties Union of No. CaHf..


461 Market Street,


San Francisco 5, Calif.


1. Please enroll me as a member at dues of


Sos for the current year. (Types of mem-


bership: Associate Member, $3; Annual Mem-


ber, $5; Business and Professional Member,


$10; Family Membership, $25; Contributing


Member, $50; Patron, $100 and over. Mem-


bership includes subscription to the `American


Civil Liberties Union-News" at $1 a year.)


. I pledge 0x00A7............ per month a or $2. per yr.


. Please enter my subscription to the NEWS, $1


per year)... oe


Hnelosed please find $..=.. Please bill


City and Zone


Page: of 4