vol. 31, no. 10

Primary tabs

American


Civil Liberties -


Union


Volume XXXI


SAN FRANCISCO, OCTOBER, 1966


Number 10


PROF, ROBERT M. O'NEIL


Six Directors Re-Elected


HOWARD A, FRIEDMAN


Branch


Ke


ee


Boara


Six vacancies on the Branch Board of Directors were filled


last month and six directors


whose terms were expiring


were re-elected. The six new directors are Mrs. Judith Bal-


derston of Berkeley, Howard A. Friedman of Hillsborough,


Dean Robert A. Keller of Stanford, Dr. Robert L. Nolan of


Oakland, Prof. Robert M. O'Neil


of Berkeley and Cecil Thomas of


Albany. Prof. Van D. Kennedy,


chairman of the board, and Prof.


John Henry Merryman, former


chairman, who had both been


filling unexpired terms, were


both elected to three-year terms.


Ralph Atkinson, Leo Borregard,


John Rutherford and Stephen


Thiermann were all re-elected to


three-year terms. Under the By-


Laws, directors may serve two


successive three-year terms after


which they become ineligible for


re-election for one year.


Many Board Changes


Last year, seven directors were


elected who had not seen pre-


vious service. This year, five of


the new directors have not seen


previous service. The present


board has thirty members but


under a so-called "interim plan,"


eight new directors will be


seated from nine chapter areas


after elections which are now


being held. -


The vacancies that were filled


were created by the resignations


of The Rev. Richard Byfield, (c)


Prof. Robert Cole, Richard De-


Lancie, Albert Haas, Jr., and


Prof. Charles Muscatine. The


final vacancy was. created


through the ineligibility for re-


election of attorney Gregory


Stout, who has served two suc-


cessive three-year terms on the


board.


Howard A. Friedman


For two short terms expiring


October 31, 1967, the board elect-


ed Howard A. Friedman and


Prof. Robert M. O'Neil. Mr.


Friedman is former chairman of


the board of directors who was


ineligible for re-election last


year. He is a member of the


firm of Schubart and Friedman,


san Francisco architects,


Prof. Robert M. O'Neil


-Robert M. O'Neil is Professor


of Law at the School of Law at


the University of California,


Berkeley, where he has been lo-


cated for the past three years.


He holds A.B. M.A, and LL.B.


degrees from Harvard. He is a


member of the Massachusetts


Bar and the Americaiu Bar Asso-


ciation. He has previously taught


at San Francisco State (Freedom


of Speech), Tufts (general


speech), and Harvard (American


History). He clerked for Mr. Jus-


tice Brennan during the 1962


term of the U.S. Supreme Court.


His writing has been in the field


of general law and the Bill of


Rights for students and adminis-


trative law for law journals. He


is chairman of the Association


of American Law Schools Com-


mittee on Teaching Law Outside


the Law Schools and has organ-


ized several workshops for teach-


ers on teaching about the Bill of


Rights. :


Biographical information on


-Continued on Page 3


Membership


Dues Increased


By ACLUNC


The board of directors of the


ACLUNC has authorized an in-


crease in the minimum dues.


Three categories are affected.


The basic or "Annual" dues has


been raised to $8 from $7; the


"Student" membership has been


raised to $3 from $2: while the


"Family" membership has been


raised to $15 from $14, Also, an


"Organization" membership cate-


gory has been authorized at $25


dues.


The increase in dues results


from the growing financial needs


of the branch. The current fiscal


year has been saved from a defi-


cit only because of a substantial


bequest. During the coming fis-


cal year, in response to the ure-


ing of the chapters, the branch


is embarking. on a legislative


program. This program will add


$16,000 to the budget. When the


membership. receives the annual


budget appeal at the end of this


month it will be asked to in-


crease its giving in order to


meet not only the inflated cost


of doing business but to finance


this added program of the ACLU.


ROBERT L. NOLAN, M.D.


Forsiner -


seard Case


Concluded


Contrary to expectations, the:


City and County of San Francisco


has not sought any further re-


view from the decision of Justice


Devine for the State District.


Court of Appeal that the City was -


wrong in dismissing James Forst-


ner from his job as a probation


officer at the Youth Guidance


Center because he refused to


shave his beard. This means that


the decision of the District Court


of Appeal (reported in the Sep-


tember ACLU News) is final and


that Forstner will recover slight-


ly over $5,000 in back salary plus


interest on this amount at 7%.


Forstner was kept from his


job nearly nine months until Su-


perior Court Judge Joseph Kar-


esh ordered him back on the job


pending the City's appeal from


Judge Karesh's decision that


there .was no basis for firing


Forstner. In the more than two


years that Forstner has been


working as a probation officer


with his beard there has been no


complaint concerning his work


and he has received special com-


mendation for certain aspects of


his work at the Juvenile Hall.


4 | oo


Biack Panther


Button Banned


In Fremont H.S.


A recurring problem at the


public school level is a prohibi-


tion against the wearing of lapel


buttons, especially peace buttons.


Core buttons have also been in


disfavor with school administra-


tors, and now the Black Panther


party button worn by a 16-year-


old boy at Washington High:


School in Fremont has been dis-


approved. Indeed, Dr. Callahan,


the principal, required the boy


to remove the button or face sus-


pension. His position seems to be


that while there is no regulation


covering the matter, since the


wearing of the button might


lead to a conflict among the stu-


dents it may be banned. In other


words, the administrator is play-


ing it safe.


lf the wearing of lapel buttons


interferes with the educational


process, such as an obtrusive,


platter-sized button, it should, of


course, be banned. But identify-


ing oneself with ideas and causes


by means of buttons (especially


at election time) is a traditional


way of exercising First Amend-


ment freedoms. Such action dis-


turbs no one's peace any more


than. the communication of con-


troversial ideas by other means.


Leo Richard Christensen Case


A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed in Fed-


eral District


Court last~ month


by ACLU staff counsel


Marshall W. Krause on behalf of Leo Richard Christensen


who is an enlisted man in the Navy stationed at Treasure


Island. After reading the petition and memorandum of


authorities Federal District Judge


Stanley Weigel issued an order to


show cause setting the matter for


a hearing in his courtroom on


October 5 at 2:30 p.m.


Administrative Discharge Denied


The petition reveals that Chris-


tensen became a member of the


Society of Friends after he haa


enlisted in the Navy and was


thus precluded by his religious


principles from participating in


the armed forces. He applied for


an administrative discharge as


permitted by Navy regulations


because of his conscientious ob-


jections, but the Director of


Naval personnel informed him


that his request was submitted


" a] q


Halvonik Named


(R) :


Legis. Rep. and


q e q p


Legal Assistant


Paul N. Halvonik of Berkeley


has been selected as the


ACLUNC's new Asst. Staff Coun-


sel and Legislative Representa-


tive. His appointment becomes


effective on November 1.


Halvonik, 27, was born in Los


Angeles and received both his


A.B. and LL.B. degrees from


the University of California in


Berkeley. From 1961-1963 he was


a reader in the Department of


Speech at U.C, for Albert Ben-


dich, Coleman Blease and Joel


Goldfarb. He was also a Research


Assistant at the Law School dur-


ing the same period, At the Law


School he was elected to the


Order of the Coif. He also held


the John Woodman Ayer Fellow-


ship, the Walter Dinkelspiel


Scholarship; and the American


Jurisprudence Award in Consti-


tutional Law. He is a member of


the California Bar.


Halvonik was Administrative


Assistant to State Senator Fred


S. Farr from 1963 to 1965. He as-


sisted Senator Farr in the dis-


charge of his legislative duties in


Sacramento during the 1964


budget session and in his dis-


trict. He managed Sen, Farr's


successful re-election campaign


of 1964.


Halvonik has served as a Dep-


uty Attorney General of the


State of California in the Attor-


ney General's San Francisco of-


fice since 1965. He has had ex-


tensive experience in handling


cases at the appellate level.


Halvonik is married and is


the father of a 64-year-old


daughter


PAUL N. HALVONIK


to the Director of Selective Serv-


ice, who stated that, had Chris-


tensen been a civilian, he would


not be eligible for conscientious


objector status. Therefore, the


Navy denied Christensen an ad-


ministrative discharge.


Special Court-Martial


When Christensen persisted in


holding to the view that his re-


ligious principles prevented him


from participating in the Navy, he


was given a special court-mar-


tial for disobedience to lawful


orders, After hearing all the


testimony, the court-martial pan-


el unanimously voted to sentence


Christensen to "no punishment'.


and to recommend to the Navy


that he be given an administra-


tive discharge because of the sin-


cerity of his conscientious objec-


tions.


Second Court-Martial


This recommendation of the


court-martial was refused and now


Christensen is again faced with a


court-martial for failure to obey


a second order. The petition al-


leges that the trial of tne threat-


ened court-martial would subject


the petitioner to severe punish-


ment and a possible bad conduct


discharge whereas he should have


been discharged as a conscien-


tidus objector and his application


for such a discharge was turned


down for arbitrary or no reasons


and solely to punish him for his


religious beliefs. :


Army Veteran


Christensen was born in Wash-


ington and has already served a


period of three years in the


United States Army and received


an honorable discharge for this


service, He enlisted in the Navy


at a time of great personal stress


and primarily as an attempt to


solve pressing problems with his


family. After his enlistment he


realized that he was in sympathy


with the principles of non-vio-


lence of the Society of Friends


and came to the decision that he


could no longer participate in


any branch of the armed forces,


(The Society of Friends is an


establisbed pacifist church and


takes the official position "that


war and Christianity are incom-


patible; and, therefore, as Chris-


tians they (Friends) cannot un-


der any circumstances, support


ov prepare for war.")


Arbitrary Action


The petition states that there


is no factual basis for the denial


of Christensen's claim to be a


conscientious objector and that


all the evidence indicates that he


is such an objector and would be


awarded such status if he were a


civilian. Also, the petition points


out that he had no opportunity


for hearing before a decision on


his administrative discharge and


no opportunity for review of this


decision or to see the reasons


for the decision.


No Precedent for Challenge


There is no precedent for chal-


- lenging refusal to accord to -a


member of the armed services


an administrative discharge in a


federal court action or in any


other forum. However, the ACLU


argues that since the Supreme


Court of the United States has


Said that the right to judicial


review will be implied for deci.


sions denying conscientious ob


-Continued on Page 4


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION NEWS


Published by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California


Second Class Mail privileges authorized at San Francisco, California


ERNEST BESIG .. . Editor


503 Market Street, San Francisco, California $4105, EXbrook 2-4692


Subscription Rates -- Two Dollars a Year


Twenty Cents Per Copy


po 151


On Oct


Board of Directors of the American Civil Liberties Union


of Northern California


CHAIRMAN: Prof. Van D. Kennedy


VICE-CHAIRMEN: Rabbi Alvin |. Fine


Helen Salz


EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Ernest Besig


Ralph B. Atkinson, John R. May


Dr. Alfred Azevedo Prof. John Henry Merryman


Albert M. Bendich Rey. Rebert J. O'Brien


Leo Borregard Prof. Rebert M. O'Neal


Prof. Jchn Edwards Clarence E. Rust


Howard A. Friedman Jehn Brisbin Rutherford


Rey. Aron 0x00A7. Gilmartin bArs. Alec Skelnick


Evelio Grilic Gregory S. Stout


Mrs. Zora Cheever Gross Stephen Thiermann


Albert Haas, Jr. Richard E. Tuttle


Heward H. Jewel Donald Vial


Ephraim Margelin Richard J. Werthimer


GENERAL COUNSEL: Wayne M. Collins


STAFF COUNSEL: Marshall W. Krause


ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: Mrs. Pamela S. Ford


CHAPTER DIRECTOR: Mrs. Marcia D. Lang


Committee of Sponsors


Reger Kent


Mrs. Ruth Kingman


Prof. Theodore Kreps


Prof. Carlo Lastrucci


Norman Lezin


Rey. Robert W. Moon


Dr. Marvin J. Naman


Prof Hubert Phillips


Prof. Wilson Record


Dr. Norman Reider


Prof. Wallace Steqner


Mrs. Theedosia Stewart


Rt. Rey. Sumner Walters


Henorary Treasurer:


Joseph S$. Thompsen


Honerary Board Member:


Sara Bard Field


Mess. Gladys Brown


Mrs. Paul Couture


John J. Eagan


Joseph Eichler


Morse Erskine


Dr. H. H. Fisher


_ Mrs. Margaret C. Hayes


Prof. Ernest Hilgard


Mrs. Paul Holmer


Mrs. Mary Hutchinson


Richard Johnston


"Clean' Still on the


November Ballot


A joint suit by the American Civil Liberties Union of


Northern and Southern California filed in the State Supreme


Court last month failed to keep the CLEAN initiative meas-


ure, now known as Proposition 16, off the Nevember ballot.


The measure would revise and expand the anti-obscenity


' Jaw in California and is believed


to be unconstitutional by many


lawyers including many not not-


ed for any bias against the valid-


ity of such legislation, such as


the District Attorney of Los An-


geles County and the City At-


torney of the City of San Diego.


The ACLU suit sought a writ of


mandate against Secretary of


State Frank Jordan to prevent


him from wasting the taxpayers'


money by placing the initiative


measure on the ballot when it


was inevitable that, if the meas-


ure passes, it will be declared


unconstitutional. The State Su-


preme Court unanimously de-


clined to entertain the suit, thus


indicating that it wanted to see


whether the initiative would be


passed by the voters before pass-


ing on its legal validity.


No Decision on the Merits


The decision of the State Su-


preme Court is in no sense a de-


cision on the merits of Propo-


sition 16 since it would be an


extraordinary move to refuse to


allow a measure to go on the


` ballet. Although this has been


dene in rare instances in the past,


the State Supreme Court refused


te take such action with respect


te Propesitions 14 and 15 on the


1864 ballot which were subse-


quently declared unconstitu-


tional by that same court. The


ACLU suit maintained that the


declaration of invalidity of the


preposition after it passed (if it


passes) would not adequately


protect First Amendment rights


because in the interim before


`such a ruling could be obtained


there would be many threats of


`prosecution under the broadened


definition and beok and maga-


zine dealers as well as movie


distributors would be intimidated


by the uncertain reach of the


law and would excercise a self-


ACLU NEWS


OCTOBER, 1966


Page 2


censorship damaging to the gen-


eral public.


Growing Opposition


During the last month strong


support has been added to the


ACLU's position that Proposition


16 is unconstitutional and dan-


gerous to freedom of expression.


Meeting in Anaheim, the Board


of Governors of the State Bar of


California warned that the propo-


sition was unconstitutional and


at the same time the 600 dele-


gates representing bar associa-


tions throughout the state at the


State Bar Convention voted over-


whelmingly to confirm and sup-


port the action of the Board of


Governors. Fortunately, Proposi-


tion 16 will not be a partisan


issue as Many incumbents from


both parties have denounced the


measure. Among those recently


announcing their opposition are


Assemblyman William T, Bagley


(Rep. Marin-Sonoma), Republi-


can candidate for Lt. Governor


Robert Finch, and Attorney Gen-


eral Thomas Lynch, However, 26


California senators and assembly-


men are listed on pro-16 litera-


ture as supporting the measure.


A good deal of money is being


raised by those who are using


the easy slogan of "Dollars for


Decency." It is obvious that the


campaign toe pass CLEAN will


spend lavishly on advertising and


work diligently among groups


highly susceptible tc propaganda


slegans and unfamiliar with basic


principles of freedom of expres-


sion.


Ass 2 blyman


John Knox Speaks


Against "Glean"


A public meeting featuring


speakers, both for and against


Propesition 16, including Assem-


blyman John Knox, will be held


at the San Ramon Valley Branch


Library in Danville on Wednes-


day, October 12, starting at 8 p.m.


DiTullio Appeal


To Be Argued


r 14


The case of Professor Edmund


diTullio, former Chico State Col-


lege Professor of History. who


was convicted of disturbing the


peace because of his speech at a


discussion of the war in Vietnam


in the Chico Town Plaza, will be


argued before the Butte County


Superior Court at 10:30 a.m. on


October 14. The judge hearing


the case is the Honorable J. F.


Good and the case will be ar-


gued in the Butte County Court-


house in Oroville. DiTullio's con-


viction for the alleged use of


"vulgar, profane, or indecent"


language in a loud and boister-


ous manner came after a long


jury trial on December 8, 1965.


He was represented then and is


represented now by ACLU staff


counsel Marshall W. Krause.


ACLU Conientions


Long briefs have been filed by


both sides in the diTullio matter


with the Professor's counse] mak-


ing 7 major points. First it is


argued that the standards used


in the statute are so broad and


vague as to violate First Amend-


ment requirements for "narrew


specificity" in regulating the con-


tent of speech and also to violate


the due process clause of the


14th Amendment by not giving


adequate notice of what language


will be deemed to be criminal. It


is also argued that the statute


is unconstitutional in failing to


detail any of the safeguards re-


quired in the First Amendment


area such as taking into account


community standards, the reac-


tion of the average person in-


stead of the specially sensitive


persons, requiring that the clear


and present danger test be ap-


plied and protecting utterances


which have social importance.


Erroneous Instructions


It is next argued that the trial


court's instructions to the jury


were erroneous under the law


and under the Constitution and


encouraged the jury to convict if


it found that diTullio had ut-


tered one "damn" during the


course of his one and a half


hours of moderating and answer-


ing questions on a controversial


topic of public interest. The


briefs also argued the question


of misconduct of the prosecutor,


prejudicial error in the trial


court's refusal to allow three


witnesses for the defendant (one


of whom was an eye witness) to


testify on erroneous grounds, and


a spate of other errors which


combined to prevent the de-


fendant from having a fair trial.


New ACLU In


Nebraska


The American Civil Liberties


Union recently announced the


organization of the Nebraska


Civil Liberties Union as its new-


est affiliate,


Approval of the National ACLU


Beard of Directors was unani-


mous, and John de J. Pemberton,


Jy., Executive Director, noted


that the Nebraska ACLU be-


comes the 38th state affiliate of


the 46-year-old national civil lib-


erties organization. There are 125


local chapters within the various


state groups.


Diablo Valiey


Chapter Meets


On Oct. 9


The Diable Valley Chapter


of ACLUNC will heid its an-


nual meeting for the election


of beard members at Diablo


Valley Cellege on Sunday af-


ternoon, October 9. Marshall


W. Krause, ACLUNC Staff


Counsel, will speak on the


CLEAN initiative. Don San-


ferd, Chairman of the chapter


beard, urges full attendance


of the membership at this im-


portant meeting.


Cle an Tr icl c


One and only one initiative measure will appear on the


November State Ballot-Proposition 16, the so-called "Clean'"'


Amendment which qualified through petitions circulated by


a Southern California organization whose awkwardly con-


trived name. `California League Enlisting Action Now,"


acrostically titled the amendment.


Outside of those who circulated and signed the petition,


this anti-pornography measure seems to have generated little


enthusiasm. It has been endorsed by Ronald Reagan, the Re-


publican candidate for Governor, by the Southern Baptist


General Convention of California, and by various rightist


groups.


Its detractors, on the other hand, are numerous and vigor- |


ous, including Robert H. Finch, the Republican candidate .


for Lieutenant Governor. The American Civil Liberties Un-


ion, the California District Attorneys Association, the Cali-


fornia State Bar and numerous churchmen have spoken out


against it.


ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1964.batch ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1965.batch ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1966.batch ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1964.batch ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1965.batch ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1966.batch ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log we


_ The backers of Proposition 16 argue that it is necessary


to protect children against a flood of obscene matter that is


pouring over the State. Its opponents commend this osten-


sible purpose but argue that the measure goes too far and is


self-defeating in its very excessiveness. _


_ Lawyers oppose it on the grounds that it is unconstitu-


tional and presents serious enforcement problems. District


Attorneys cry it down because it compels them to press


charges, no matter how ludicrous at the behest of any citizen,


no matter how eccentric, or face a civil suit. ("This,"' says


Candidate Finch, himself a lawyer "is declaring open season


on prosecutors and handing a hunting license te every neu-


rotic in the state.")


ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1964.batch ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1965.batch ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1966.batch ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1964.batch ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1965.batch ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1966.batch ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1964.batch ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1965.batch ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1966.batch ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log


Judges would also be painfully hobbled by provisions of


Proposition 16. They would be prohibited from dismissing


any obscenity proceeding because of a lack of evidence, and


from setting aside a guilty verdict on the same grounds. The


power to fix sentence would be stripped from the judge and


vested solely in the jury.


It has been well said that the proponents of the Clean


Amendment are playing dirty pool with the voters, that their


measure is a foray into the realm of free-wheeling censorship


and a radical overturning of established law. To vote no on


16 is not to vote yes on pornography; to vote yes on 16 is to


revoke all local obscenity ordinances and to prejudice the


passage of reasonable legislation in this field.


-Editorial, San Francisco Chronicle, September 25, 1966.


The Fatal Defects In Prop. 16


Proposition 16, the anti-obscenity amendment on the


November state ballot, contains such serious dangers to lib-


erty that we have no choice but to oppose it.


Yet we support the intent of the measure vigorously, and


greatly wish that it had been drafted with more care.


Moreover, we predict-and hope-it will receive a huge


vote. A big, vote will express the public's angry disapproval


of the growing flood of obscene materials all around us-and _


most particularly the obscenity aimed at children and teen-


agers.


__ So great is this concern among the citizenry that Propo-


sition 16 could even win a majority vote, in which even the


California Supreme Court would again be confronted with


the painful duty of invalidating a measure adopted by the


people. (The editorial then sets forth arguments against the


initiative made by Robert H. Finch, Republican nominee for -


lieutenant governor.)


It is quite difficult to write effective anti-obscenity legis-


lation without imposing objectionable censorship or provid-


ing bluenoses a field day. We regret that the sponsors of


Proposition 16 missed the mark. But miss they did, and by


a wide margin.


Let us hope that Proposition 16 will at least serve the


useful purpose of spurring the Legislature to produce a fair


and effective anti-obscenity state -Excerpts from an editorial


in the September 25, 1966, issue of the San Francisco Ex-


aminer.


No Beards


Allowed In


`Anti-'Clean'


Forces Organize


S.F. State Band


Students with beards are being


banned from the San Francisco


State College Band by Dr. Edwin


Kruth, Dr. Kruth admitted to


the ACLU that there is no Col-


lege rule against wearing beards


and that the band rule is of his


own making. Said he, "It's my


band." Music majors are required


te take band or orchestra in or-


der to graduate. As the "News"


`goes to press the ACLU is await-


ing a reply to a protest it filed


with the College president.


In Eastbay


An Eastbay committee against


the so-called "CLEAN" initiative


(Proposition No. 16) is in the


process of organization under the


leadership of Mr. Arthur Aron,


2430 Dwight Way, Apartment


208, Berkeley.


An organizing meeting of a


widely representative group of


individuals from Berkeley, Rich-


mond, E] Cerrito, Oakland and


nearby cities will be held at Ply-


mouth House, Durant and Dana


Streets, Berkeley, Sunday, Octo-


ber 2, at 7:30 p.m.


Oe Oe OC ED


BB rae


Ae eee Ae Nw i


Pte ay ee we


Elect Six New M


To Branch Board


Continued from Page 1-


the four remaining new board


members is as follows:


Mrs, Judith Baldersten


Mrs. Judith Balderston is the


wife of a U.C. professor and the


mother of four children. She was


educated in New York City pub-


lic schools, Swarthmore College


and Columbia University; she has


professional training and research


experience in mathematics, eco-


nomics, and statistics. She has


been active in local community


affairs in Berkeley, including the


ACLU, School Resource Volun-


teers and League of Women


Voters. She is currently teach-


ing as a mathematics specialist


in a special elementary educa-


tion project for the disadvan-


taged.


Dean Robert A. Keller


-Rebert A. Keller has been As-


sistant Dean of the Stanford Law


Schoo] since 1965. After gradu-


ating from the University of


Oklahoma in 1951, he served on


active duty as a lieutenant in ~


the U.S. Naval Reserve from


1951-1955. He was graduated


from Stanford Law Schoo] in


1958, where he was elected to


the Order of the Coif and served


on the Stanford Law Review. He


served as an attorney with the


San Francisco law firm of Or-


rick, Dahlquist, Herrington and


Sutcliffe from 1958 to 1965. He


is a member of the Palo Alto


Human Relations Council.


Robert L. Nolan, M.D.


Dr. Robert L. Nolan of Oak-


jand is a physician who special-


izes in Pediatrics. He was born


in New York City Feb. 12, 1926.


He received his A.B. degree from


Election Day Editorials


New York University and his


M.D. from Yale. He alse received


an M.P.H. from the University


of California in 1961. He was a


member of the Oakland Board


of Education from 1961 to 1965


and he has been since 1962 a


member of the Alameda County


Democratic Central Committee.


He belongs te a number of pro-


fessional organizations and is a .


member of the Council of Social


Planning of Alameda County and


at one time served on the Board


of Directors, Citizens Committee


for Fair Housing in Oakland. He


has received various civic awards


and citations. He is a mem-


ber of the Medical Corps, US.


Naval Reserve. He is also a Con-


sultant, Maternal and Child Health


Research Unit, School of Public


Health, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley,


and Clinical Instructor in Pedi-


atrics, Univ. of Calif., School of


Medicine, San Francisco, and


Stanford Univ. School of Medi-


cine, Palo Alto. He is married


and has four children.


Ceci] Thomas


Cecil Thomas resides in Albany


and presently is on leave from


his position as Associate Peace


Secretary for the American


Friends Service Committee in


San Francisco. At this writing,


he is Acting Executive Secretary


of the National Committee on


US.-China Relations in New


York City. Mr. Thomas holds


an A.B. degree from Cedarville


College and an M.A, from North-


western. He received his Ph.D.


from Ohio State University. He


served as Executive Secretary of


the Ohio State University YMCA


for ten years and later was


Associate Executive Secretary at


Stiles Hall in Berkeley.


High Court Uphold's s Right


To Comment on Issues ,


. The U.S. Supreme Court recently set aside criminal


charges against the editor of a Birmingham, Alabama, daily


newspaper for publishing "an editorial on election day urg-


ing people to vote a certain way on issues submitted to


them." The particular editorial urged the ee to replace


the commission form of govern-


ment with a mayor-council gov-


ernment, An Alabama statute


made it an offense "to do any


electioneering or to solicit any


votes . . . in support of or in


opposition to any proposition


that is being voted on on the


day on which the election affect-


ing such candidates or proposi-


tions is being held."


Justice Huge L, Black's opin-


ion for the court declares that


"Whatever differences may exist


about interpretations of the First


' Amendment, there is practically


_ universal agreement that a ma-


jor purpose of that Amendment


i fort is also being made to se-


CLEAN Debate


In Palo Alto


October 26


The Mid-Peninsula Chapter


of ACLUNC will held a pub-


lic meeting to discuss Propeo-


sition 16, the CLEAN initia-


tive on the November ballot,


it has been announced by Dr.


John Wiicox, Temporary Pro-


gram Chairman. The meeting


will be held on October 26 at


8 p.m. at Palo Alte High


School, E] Camino and Aros-


tedero streets.


Speaking against Prop. 16


will be Anthony Boucher of


Berkeley, the distinguished


writer, and atterney James


Stewart of San Jese. An ef-


cure a speaker who supports


the proposal.


The meeting will be presid-


`ed over by Dr. John Marquis,


chairman of the Mid-Penin-


sula Chapter, -


was to protect ie fitter discussion


of governmental affairs. This of


course includes discussions of


candidates, structures, and forms


of government, the' manner in


which government is:operated or


should be operated, and all such


matters relating to political proc-


esses. The Constitution specifi-


cally selected the press, which


includes not only newspapers,


books, and magazines, but also


humble leaflets and circulars


to play an important role in the


discussion of public affairs. Thus


the press serves and was de-


signed to serve as a powerful


antidote te any abuses of power


by governmental officials and as


a constitutionally chosen means


for keeping officials elected by


the people responsible to ali the


people whom they were selected


to serve. Suppression of the right


of the press te praise or criticize


governmental agents and to


clamor and contend for or against


change, which is all that this


editorial did, muzzles one of the


very agencies the Framers of


our Constitution thoughtfully


and deliberately selected to im-


prove our society and keep it


free. The Alabama Corrupt Prac-


tices Act by providing criminal


penalties for publishing editori-


als such as the one here silences


the press at a time when it can


be most effective. It is difficult


fo conceive of a more obvious (c)


and flagrant abridgment of the


constitutionally guaranteed free-


dom of the press."


The court went to some pains


to point out that the question be-


fore it "in no way involves the


extent of a State's power to reg-


ulate conduct in and around the


polis in order to maintain peace,


order and decorum there."


|] nari's address will be "The


Champagne


Reception


On Oct. 23


The Hen. John D. Molinari,


judge of the State District


Ceurt of Appeal in San Fran-


cisce, will be the featured


speaker at the Mid-Peninsula


Chapter's annual Champagne


Reception which will be held


on Sunday, October 23, from


2:00 to 5:00 p.m. at the home


of Clarence Heller, 98 Avon


Road, Atherton.


The subject of Judge Moli-


Civil Liberties of Mental Pa-


tients." In addition, Dr. Ger-


shen Berman will speak on the


changes in the Welfare and In-


stitutions Cede prepesed by


the Mid-Peninsula Chapter to


protect the civil liberties of


mental patients.


The public is invited, Bena-


tion $1.60.


Hearing Granted


In Parrish


`Bed Check' Case


The State Supreme Court has


agreed to hear the appeal of


Benny Max Parrish from his in-


voluntary termination as a `so-


cial worker in Alameda County.


The reason Parrish was termi-


nated was that he refused to


participate in an early morning


"ped check" of persons on wel-


fare rolls to determine whether


or not there was a "man in the


' house." The action of the State


Supreme Court came after the


District Court of Appeal had


refused to set aside the firing of


Parrish, as reported in the July


ACLU News.


The District Court of Appeal


had held that Parrish and other


social workers were not being


`required to violate any person's


constitutional rights because be-


fore a "bed check" was made,


the social workers were instruct:


ed to obtain the "consent" of


the welfare recipient for a


search. This theory was strongly


attacked in briefs filed by Par-


rish's attorneys, Albert Bendich


and Coleman Blease, and by the


ACLUNC im an amicus curiae


brief prepared by Robert Laws


and Bonafacio Yturbide. These


briefs point out that blanket


`searches without probable cause


are themselves invalid and that


"consent" from persons totally


dependent upon keeping in good


graces with the Welfare Depart-


ment is not a free and voluntary


act. It is expected that the Par-


rish case will be decided by the


California Supreme Court before


the end of the year.


Chapter Areas


Now Electing


Board Directors


The election of branch direc-


tors is now taking place in eight


chapter areas in northern Cali-


fornia. Mt. Diablo Chapter is


the only one which has chosen


not te elect a director from its


area for a one-year trial period.


Special notices were sent re-


cently to all members in the re-


maining chapter areas inviting


them to suggest the names of


qualified persons to their nomi-


nating committees, Nominating


committees have now reported


to their Chapter boards. These


reports indicate that few mem-


bers suggested candidates. In the


cases of outlying chapters, nomi-


hating committees have appar-


ently had difficulty in finding


qualified candidates whe were


willing and able to run. Five of


the eight participating chapters


report, as we go to press, that


they will offer only one nominee


on their ballots. Although. the


chapter membership was notified


that any five members could also


Tenth ACLUNC Chepter


Final steps in establishing ACLUNC's tenth chapter, a


Fresno area group, will be taken at a membership meeting


to be held at the Fresno County Free Public Library on


Thursday evening, October 6, at eight o'clock. The Rev.


Aron S. Gilmartin, a member of the branch board, will attend


_and speak on the rele of a chap-


ter in advancing the program of


the ACLU.


A second speaker, Dr. William


' Dienstein, will speak on the


CLEAN initiative. Dr. Dienstein


is a member of the faculty of the


Criminology Department at Fres-


ne State College and President


of the Fresno Board of Educa-


tion.


Proposed By-Laws


Members will be asked to-ap-


prove proposed By-Laws for the


new chapter which have been


prepared by a local organizing


committee and approved by the


branch at its September 8 meet-


ing. All members residing in the


area covered by the chapter have


been invited to attend the meet-


ing and to participate in chapter


activities.


The proposed By-Laws de-


scribe the jurisdiction of the


Fresno Area chapter as embrac-


ing the extensive area of Madera,


Fresno, Tulare and Kings coun-


ties. The By-Laws go on to say,


however, that such jurisdiction


shall continue until in the judg-


ment of the branch board of di-


rectors the growth of member-


ship in any of the three counties


other than Fresro warrants the


establishment of a separate chap- -


ter. ab A.


Election of Board


Besides adopting By-Laws, the


membership will also elect an


eighteen-member board of direc-


tors which will meet briefly im-


mediately following the member-


ship meeting in order to elect its


officers, select leadership for key


committees and conduct other


essential business.


The Organizing Committee has


been under the inspired leader-


ship of Russell K. Grove, owner


of a Fresno insurance `agency,


who, with the support of an ex-


cellent committee, also headed


the area's highly successful


Spring membership campaign


which resulted in a 70% increase


in membership and a total mem-


bership on September 1 of 134.


The Organizing Committee has


prepared a program of activities


and goals for the coming year to


present to the October 6 meeting


for consideration, appointed a


nominating committee to prepare


a Slate of candidates for the first


board of directors, and has taken


steps to enlist the support of


members in the communities sur-


rounding Fresno.


Slate of Candidates


The proposed slate of candi-


dates includes Alan Amend, Hu-


nominate a candidate by submit-


ting his name and acceptance


in writing to their chapter chair-


man, at this writing no petitions


have been receved.


A ballot will be mailed to each


chapter member in good stand-


ing after October 1 together


with two envelopes for their re-


turn. After voting, members are


required to seal their ballots in


the ballot envelope and place it


in the addressed return envel-


ope, which must be signed. Bal-


lot envelopes will be opened and


counted by each chapter's elec-


tion committee, and the persons


elected will be seated at the


November meeting of the branch


Board of Directors,


manities teacher at Fresno High


School; Ernest Aronstein, M.D.,


a retired radiologist, who, before -


entering into private practice in


Fresno, was associated with the


Department of Radiology at Stan-


ford Hospital in San Francisco,


San Francisco General Hospital


and medical work in Germany


prior to 1934; Dr. A. Ralph Barr,


a research specialist in Ento-


mology with the Univ. of Califor-


nia, formerly Supervisor of Vec-


tor Research with the Calif. De-


partment of Public Health, and


on the faculties of the University


of Minnesota and the University


of Kansas; Mrs. Roslyn Dienstein,


attorney at law; Mrs. Louise


Dodgson, proprietor of a Fresno


book store; William A. Doyle, a


social worker with the Fresno


County Dept. of Public Welfare,


formerly a teacher of English


and Drama in Selma and Victor-


ville High Schools; Noel Frod-


`sham, History teacher, Fresno


City College, President of board


of Fresno Teachers' Credit Un-


ion, Editor of Federalist, pub-


lished by Fresno AFT and a


former Fulbright lecturer in Den-


mark; Morris Futlick, attorney


at Jaw; Russell K. Grove, owner


of insurance agency; Mrs. Sallie


Hurst, a registered nurse with


the Veterans Hospital, a member


of the Negro Political Action As-


sociation of California, the Wom-


en's Advisory Committee to the


FEPC, the United Nations As-


sociation and the Council for Civ- -


ic Unity of Fresno; Renald Jer-


dan, graduate student in English


at Fresno State College, member


of the Student Senate and very


active in the ACLU membership


drive, recruiting a number of


student members; Dr. Russell


Leavenworth, Professor of En-


glish at Fresno State College;


' Mrs. Werner J. Lipton, a law stu-


dent before her marriage to a


plant physiologist, now engaged


in a variety of community activi-


ties; Robert McCartney, attorney


at law; Kenneth Milton May, a


part-time graduate student at


Fresno State College in Business


Administration, presently with


the Army Reserve in the 828th


Station Hospital in Fresno, and


working in the accounting de-


partment of Pacific Telephone


Co.; Rebert Revilla, Jr., Consult-


ing Engineer, President of Val-


ley Builders, Inc., General and


Engineering Contractors, a mem-


ber of the Fresno County Grand


Jury, active in the Mental Health


Association and the Fresno Arts


Center; Hunter Scott, retired,


President of Hunter Scott Ad-


vertising Agency, Fresno, for-


merly with NBC as San Fran-


cisco News and Special Events.


Manager, active with the Ameri-


can Friends Service Committee


on Migrant Labor Housing; Jun-


ior Chamber of Commerce and


The Fresno Youth Center among


other organizations; Robert E.


Speer, owner of a Fresno insur-


ance agency, a retired Air Force


Lt. Col., and active in many com-


munity affairs.


The chapter Organizing Com-


mittee reports that many other


members in the Fresno area


stand ready to serve on commit-


tees, to assist in chapter educa-


tional projects and to assume


board posts in the future.


ACLU NEWS


OCTOBER, 1966


Page 3


- Painter Child Custody Case


Request For Hic


The American Civil Liberties Union last month urged


the U.S. Supreme Court to review an Iowa Supreme Court


decision awarding custody of a seven-year-old boy to his


grandparents, both in their sixties, because they could offer


the child a more stable life than his "Bohemian" father, |


The civil liberties group and its


affiliated Iowa Civil Liberties


Union filed a friend-of-the-court


brief with the high tribunal on


behalf of Harold Painter, father


of young Mark Painter, arguing


that "the determination by the


Towa Supreme Court in this case


is in derogation of the constitu-


tional rights of the father and


child involved ... and a usur-


pation by the State of the pa-


rental rights and obligations of


one who concededly is a fit and


proper parent."


The ACLU brief also argued


that the state court's use of


Painter's religious and political


beliefs to justify its action vio-


lated the First and Fourteenth


Amendments to the Constitution.


Job Corps Photographer


Harold Painter, a 35-year-old


Job Corps photographer in Pleas-


anton, California, asked Mr. and


Mrs. Dwight Bannister, Mark's


maternal grandparents, to care


for the boy temporarily after his


wife was killed in an automobile


accident in December 1962. A


year after Mark went to stay with


the Bannisters, Painter became


engaged and asked for the child's


return, which was refused. When


Painter and his second wife, a


college graduate who had con-


siderable experience with chil-


- dren, were married and bought


a home for Mark and themselves,


they again unsuccessfully sought


his return. Finally taking the


case to court, Mr. Painter was


found to be a fit parent who had


not abandoned his son and was


awarded custody of the boy by


an Lowa district court. But


Mark's grandparents appealed to


the State Supreme Court, which


last spring reversed custody on


the ground that the Bannisters


could provide a more convention-


al, middle-class atmosphere for


the boy.


Not Unfit Parent


The ACLU brief challenged


the state high court's decision to


turn Mark over to his grandpar-


ents "in the child's best interest"


even though the court conceded


that Painter had not abandoned


the boy nor was he in any way an


unfit parent. Charging that the


right of a fit parent to raise his


child is protected by the Four-


teenth Amendment's provision


against the deprivation of "life,


liberty, or property without due


process of law," the brief assert-


ed that the "role of the court as


protector of children against


their. natural parents is limited


to cases involving mistreatment


or mishandling by the parent that


will in some way endanger the


child's health or welfare.' The


Bannisters were granted custody,


the Union brief contended, "on


the totally invalid assumption


that the court had the right and


obligation, purportedly in the


child's best interests, to deter-


mine whether someone other


than the child's natural parent


could provide him with a supe-


rior environment."


The Union's charge was backed


by the words of the Iowa Su-


preme Court that Mark should


- live with his grandparents be-


ACLU NEWS


OCTOBER, 1966


Page 4


eause life with his father "would


be unstable, unconventional, arty,


Bohemian, and probably intellec-


tually stimulating."


Wealthier and More Conservative


The ACLU brief argued: "An


appellate court's supposition that


a child's welfare will be ad-


vanced by turning him over to


someone wealthier and more con-


servative than his natural parent


is not a sufficiently grave reason


for depriving the parent of cus-


tody. The general maxim that a.


child is a ward of the court and


that the court should act in what


it deems to be in the child's best


interests may not be stretched:


to justify the court's assuming


the role of a parent's surrogate,


when the parent is able and


wishes to take care of the child


himself."


Father's Philosophies


The Union also maintained that


the First Amendment was vio-


lated when the state high court,


in making its decision, "ex-


amined several of Harold Paint-


er's `philosophies,' which it felt


were `important as they relate


custody of his child."


were Painter's interest in Zen


Buddhism and the fact that he


"is either an agnostic or atheist


and has no concern for formal .


religious training," unlike the


Bannisters, who plan to send -


Mark to a Congregational


Church, "The court thus made


it plain,' the ACLU brief said,


"that a father who wishes to


keep or regain the custody of his .


child, should observe certain


forms of religion approved by the


court or have his personal relig-


ious beliefs, atheism or agnosti-


cism, count against him." The


brief added that "the Constitu-


tion forbids any coercion to fol-


low a creed or to practice a form


of worship, even by indirection."


Political Liberal


The brief charged further First


Amendment violations in the


state court's consideration of


Painter's political attitudes "as


a relevant, if not controlling fac-.


tor in determining his right to


custody of his child."


Hearing For


Navy Objector


Continued from Page 1-


jector status to civilians even


though Congress said that the


administrative decision in such


`matters shall be "final," the same


legal reasoning should require


that there be judicial review of


such an application by a member


uf the armed services, Otherwise,


there would be no way to review


totally arbitrary decisions as the


decision in the Christensen case


seems to be.


Impressive Support


Accompanying the petition were


letters of recommendation from


an impressive group of people,


including members of the court-


martial panel, Christensen's Com-


manding Officer, a Navy Chap-


lain, and three members of the


society of Friends, all support-


ing Christensen's position and


attesting to his sincerity and


strength of belief.


Membership Another Arrest in.


At Record


High of 6948


The paid-up membership of


the ACLU of Northern Califor-


nia climbed to a record high, on


August 31, of 6948. This was an


increase of 219 since a year ago.


In addition, the branch had 216


separate subscribers to the


"News." The paid mailing list


totals 7104.


Most of the Union's support is


concentrated in 49 communities


having 20 or more members.


About 52% of the membership


lived in areas where the branch


had chapters. Most of the chap-


ter areas have shown a gain in


membership. The greatest gains


were made by the Mid-Peninsu-


la chapter which showed a net


gain of 93 supporters. Santa


Clara Valley gained 29 mem-


bers, Santa Cruz County 16, Mon-


terey County 15, Mt. Diablo 8,


and Stockton 2, The remaining


three chapters suffered losses in


membership. Berkeley - Albany


lost 8 members, Marin County 7


members and Sacramento Valley


49 members.


On August 31, the chapters had


the following mailing lists (mem-


bers and subscribers): Berkeley-


Albany, 1300; Mid - Peninsula,


671; Marin County, 477; Sacra-


mento Valley, 362; Santa Clara


Valley, 280; Mt. Diablo, 239;


Santa Cruz, 141; Monterey Coun-


ty, 115; and Stockton, 81. The


new Fresno Chapter starts with


a membership of 134,


Santa Rosa increased its mem-


bership from 22 to 57. The mem-


bership made a substantial jump


in Sonoma County principally


because of the efforts of the Rev.


Geoffrey P. Selth. A movement


is under way in Sonoma County


to petition for establishment of


a chapter, Outside of Santa Rosa,


however, the membership is


scattered.


Following is the list of commu-


nities in which the ACLUNC


has 20 or more supporters:


Increase


or


1966 1965 Decrease


San Francisco 1436 1459 (23)


Berkeley 1265 1281 . (16)


Oakland 339 306 33


Palo Alto 295 248 47


Sacramento 201 220 (19)


San Jose 142 122 0x00B0 20


Mill Valley 128-131 = 3)


Fresno dike 35


Menlo Park 107 97 #410


' Davis 9 96 (1)


Stanford 94, GT 27


El Cerrito 93: 97 (euro 4)


Santa Cruz 87 OTT 10


San Mateo 56 of 1D


Los Altos 85 = 82 3


San Rafael 82. 8%. 5)


Stockton 81 3679 2


Sausalito 66:66.


Los Gatos 638 45 18


Livermore 59 66 ( 7)


Orinda 58 55 a


Redwood City 58 39 19


Santa Rosa Of 22, 239


Walnut Creek 50 47 3


Richmond 49 53 ( 4)


Carmel 45 44 1


Napa 41 43 ( 2)


Lafayette 40 41 (1)


Hillsborough Si. 45 (euro8)


Mountain View 36 27 9


Albany' 3) 2h 7


Portola Valley .35 25 pound10


Fremont oa) 22 dE:


Hayward 3a. 30 3


San Anselmo 32 34 -( 2)


Chico 31 s s


Monterey | 31 = -


Aptos 30 "25 5


Kenttield 800x00B0 25 5


Castro Valley 29-25 4


Daly City 29 20 Qe


Concord 26 290x00B0 (3)


Modesto 25 29 (4)


Carmichael 24 24 0x00A7 28


Sunnyvale 23-30 ( 71)


Burlingame 210x00B0 30- (9)


Saratoga 2h 21:


Corte Madera 20- 20. 2-


Tiburon 20-23 (3)


( ) indicates a decrease.


*Not on the list last year, so


exact increase not known,


"The Beard' Play Case


About a week after Michael McClure's play "The Beard"


was presented to an audience of 600 at a Berkeley theater,


the cast was again arrested and charged with engaging in


lewd or dissolute conduct in public. The Berkeley arrests


evidently were triggered by


Municipal Court Judge Lawrence


_ Mana to throw out the charges


. against the two actors when ar-


rests were made after the per-


formance of the play in San


Francisco. As in San Francisco,


the east, Richard Bright and Bil-


lie Dixon, were released without


bail and legal moves were prom-


ised to attempt to throw out the


charge before the case came to


trial,


ACLU Representation


The American Civil Liberties


Union is representing the two


actors in both eases and will


claim in writ proceedings to be


filed in higher courts that the


attempt to pick out parts of the


play and charge that the actor


and actress engaged in some for-


bidden' conduct violates First


Amendment standards requiring


that an artistic creation be con-.


sidered as a whole and that the


other safeguards of First Amend-


`ment freedoms be applied to any


artistic expression. Further per-


formances of the play will await


the outcome of the legal proceed-


ings. Attorneys Malcolm Burn-


stein and Douglas Hill are act-


ing as volunteer counsel for the


case in Alameda County,


Critic's Views


The Berkeley Gazette's critic


Fred Wyatt. found the play


"lucid, coherent, convincing and


of prodigious impact." The gifted


Richard Bright as Billy the Kid


and Billie Dixon as Jean Harlow


must have been rehearsed to


near the breaking point by Di-


rector Mark Estrin. ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1964.batch ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1965.batch ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1966.batch ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1964.batch ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1965.batch ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1966.batch ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log ACLUN_1946 ACLUN_1946.MODS ACLUN_1946.batch ACLUN_1947 ACLUN_1947.MODS ACLUN_1947.batch ACLUN_1948 ACLUN_1948.MODS ACLUN_1948.batch ACLUN_1949 ACLUN_1949.MODS ACLUN_1949.batch ACLUN_1950 ACLUN_1950.MODS ACLUN_1950.batch ACLUN_1951 ACLUN_1951.MODS ACLUN_1951.batch ACLUN_1952 ACLUN_1952.MODS ACLUN_1952.batch ACLUN_1953 ACLUN_1953.MODS ACLUN_1953.batch ACLUN_1954 ACLUN_1954.MODS ACLUN_1954.batch ACLUN_1955 ACLUN_1955.MODS ACLUN_1955.batch ACLUN_1956 ACLUN_1956.MODS ACLUN_1956.batch ACLUN_1957 ACLUN_1957.MODS ACLUN_1957.batch ACLUN_1958 ACLUN_1958.MODS ACLUN_1958.batch ACLUN_1959 ACLUN_1959.MODS ACLUN_1959.batch ACLUN_1960 ACLUN_1960.MODS ACLUN_1960.batch ACLUN_1961 ACLUN_1961.MODS ACLUN_1961.batch ACLUN_1962 ACLUN_1962.MODS ACLUN_1962.batch ACLUN_1963 ACLUN_1963.MODS ACLUN_1963.batch ACLUN_1964 ACLUN_1964.MODS ACLUN_1964.batch ACLUN_1965 ACLUN_1965.MODS ACLUN_1965.batch ACLUN_1966 ACLUN_1966.MODS ACLUN_1966.batch ACLUN_1967 ACLUN_1967.MODS ACLUN_1968 ACLUN_1968.MODS ACLUN_1969 ACLUN_1969.MODS ACLUN_1970 ACLUN_1970.MODS ACLUN_1971 ACLUN_1971.MODS ACLUN_1972 ACLUN_1972.MODS ACLUN_1973 ACLUN_1973.MODS ACLUN_1974 ACLUN_1974.MODS ACLUN_1975 ACLUN_1975.MODS ACLUN_1976 ACLUN_1976.MODS ACLUN_1977 ACLUN_1977.MODS ACLUN_1978 ACLUN_1978.MODS ACLUN_1979 ACLUN_1979.MODS ACLUN_1980 ACLUN_1980.MODS ACLUN_1981 ACLUN_1981.MODS ACLUN_1982 ACLUN_1982.MODS ACLUN_1983 ACLUN_1983.MODS ACLUN_1984 ACLUN_1984.MODS ACLUN_1985 ACLUN_1985.MODS ACLUN_1986 ACLUN_1986.MODS ACLUN_1987 ACLUN_1987.MODS ACLUN_1988 ACLUN_1988.MODS ACLUN_1989 ACLUN_1989.MODS ACLUN_1990 ACLUN_1990.MODS ACLUN_1991 ACLUN_1991.MODS ACLUN_1992 ACLUN_1992.MODS ACLUN_1993 ACLUN_1993.MODS ACLUN_1994 ACLUN_1994.MODS ACLUN_1995 ACLUN_1995.MODS ACLUN_1996 ACLUN_1996.MODS ACLUN_1997 ACLUN_1997.MODS ACLUN_1998 ACLUN_1998.MODS ACLUN_1999 ACLUN_1999.MODS ACLUN_ladd ACLUN_ladd.MODS ACLUN_ladd.bags ACLUN_ladd.batch add-tei.sh create-bags.sh create-manuscript-bags.sh create-manuscript-batch.sh fits.log Per-


haps "The Beard" disturbs sedate


eyes and ears somewhat the way


Dizzy Gillespie and the other


bopsters once disturbed minds


accustomed to the more melodi-


ous jazz called swing."


ACLU Position


The ACLU argued before


Judge Mana that he ought to sus-


tain a demurrer and dismiss the


complaint, but the judge -sus-


tained. the . District Attorney's


position that if an act otherwise


punishable as a crime occurs on


the stage it does not matter that


it was part of the larger play,


and it can be punished separate-


ly. As to the difference between


Photocopying


Machine Needed


By ACLU


If any reader knows of a dry-


process photocopying machine


that is available at a reasonable


price, please call ACLU (EX-


brook 2-4692). Our present ma-


shine has become inefficient and


is costly and time-consuming.


The budget does not allow for a


new machine and we, therefore,


seek to purchase one that is


used,


The first right of a citizen


Is the right


To be responsible


the failure of San Francisco


doing an act and representing an


"act on the stage, the judge and


the District Attorney were of the


opinion that this was a matter


of proof at the trial and not a


matter which could be gone into


in pretrial proceedings.


STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP


MANAGEMENT AND CIRCULATION


(Act of October 23, 1962; Section


4363, Title 39, United States Code)


1. Date of filing. Sept. 19, 1966.


2. Title of Publication - American


Civil Liberties Union News.


3. Frequency of Issue-Monthly.


4. Location of Known Office of


Publication (Street, city, county,


state, zip code)-503 Market St., San


Francisco, Calif. 94105.


5. Location of the Headquarters or


General Business Offices of the Pub-


lishers (Not printers)-503 Market St.,


San Francisco, Calif. 94105.


6. Names and Addresses of Pub-


lisher, Editor, and Managing Editor-


Publisher (Name and address) Amer-


ican Civil Liberties Union of North-


ern Calif., Inc., 503 Market St., San


Francisco, Calif. Editor (Name and


address) Ernest Besig, 503 Market


St., San Francisco, Calif. 94105. Man-


aging Editor (Name and address)


None.


7. Owner (If owned by a corpora-


tion, its name and address must be


stated and also immediately there-


under the names and addresses of


stockholders owning or holding 1 per-


cent or more of total amount of stock.


If not Owned by a corporation, the


names and addresses of the individual


owners must be given. If owned by a


partnership or other unincorporated


firm, its name and address, as well as


that of each individual must be


given.)-American Civil Liberties Un-


jon of No. .Calif., Inc., 503 Market St.,


San Francisco, Calif. 94105. No Stock-


holders. Es


8. Known bondholders, Mortgagees,


and other Security Holders Owning or


Holding 1 Percent or More of Total


Amount of Bonds, Mortgages or Other


Securities (If there are none, so state)


-None. 5


9. Paragraphs 7 and 8 include, in


cases where the stockholder or secu~


rity holder appears upon the books


of the company as trustee or in any


other fiduciary relation, the name of


the person or corporation for whom


such trustee is acting, also the state-


ments in the two paragraphs show the


affiant's full knowledge and belief as


to the circumstances and conditions


under which stockholders and security


holders who do not. appear upon the


books. of the company as_ trustees,


hold stock and securities in a Ccapac-


ity other than that of a bona fide


owner. Names and addresses of indi-


viduals who are stockholders of @


corporation which itself is a stock-


holder or holder of bonds, mortgages


or other securities of the publishing


corporation have been included in


paragraphs 7 and 8 when the interests


of such individuals are equivalent to


i percent or more of the total amount


of the stock or securities of the pub-


lishing corporation. eae!


10. This item must be completed for


all publications except those which do


not carry advertising other than the


publisher's own and which are named


in Sections 132.231, 182.232 and 132.233,


Postal Manual (Sections 4355a, 4355b;


and 4356 of Title 39, United States


Code). : i


A. Total No. Copies Printed (Net


Press' Run). Average No. copies each


issue during preceding 12 months-


9583. Single issue nearest to filing


date-9000.


B. Paid Circulation 3 :


1. Sales throubh dealers and car-


riers, street vendors and counter


sales-None. :


2, Mail subscriptions-6603; 6807.


C. Total Paid Circulation-6603, 6807.


D. Free Distribution (including


samples) by Mail, Carrier or Other


Means-2480, 993. :


pound. Total Distribution (Sum of euro


and D)-9083, 7800.


EF. Office Use, Left-over, Unaccount-


ed, Spoiled after Printing-500, 1200.


G. Total. (Sum of E and F-should


oe net press run as shown in A)-


, 9000.


I certify that the statements made


by me above are correct and complete.


ERNEST BESIG


8


N TODAY


G0 151


JO!


AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION -


3 OF


Patron Membership


NORTHERN CALIFORNIA


wee te ee ee ee POO


Sustaining Membership .......0..45. Pe oe OU


Business and Professional Membership .........+.0++ 20


Family MMWembersiio -... 42.2.0) 3 , 1S


Associate Membership ,...2.23.6...252.5-02. ss 0


Anadal Membership .....-.; 5. 50.1, -. a


Student Membership ...... foe ee 5


ACLU News Subscription"... ........


NAME.


eee oHPHCCHTTH HR EHO THO HEECHOHHE HHH HEE


POORER


_ TELEPHONE NUMBER. -. 2...


oe 6 0 6 (c) 6 eo oo 99 2 OG,


foe a 2 00


ee oeeeoee Fee 760% 2988


0s 8008 eo Oe


ee AMT ENCLOSED


503 Market Street


San Francisco, 94105


Page: of 4