vol. 80, no. 1
Primary tabs
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Page 7 |
ALegal |
Victory |
PG
Ct Se
ue
Tay dT,
2 A Personal Story of Bill of Rights Day
5 An Inside look at Know Your Rights
Trainings
6 New Cases and Legal Victories
10 Legislative Update
PAID
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation
39 Drumm Sct.
San Francisco, CA 94111
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
of NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Too.
CATHOLIC HOSPITALS CONTINUE
TO ENDANGER PATIENTS IN THE
NAME OF RELIGION
ebecca Chamorro was over eight months pregnant when a judge in
he San Francisco Superior Court ruled in early January that she didn't
have a right to basic reproductive health care at her local hospital.
Chamorro lives in Redding with her husband and her
two young children. She's a patient at the only hospital in
Redding with a labor and delivery ward, Dignity Health's
Mercy Medical Center.
Along with the birth control pill, tubal ligation-known
familiarly as "getting one's tubes tied" -is the contraceptive
method most chosen by American women. One out of
every four women who use contraception opt for a tubal
ligation; and an estimated 600,000 women undergo this
procedure each year. Ifa pregnant person decides to have a
tubal ligation, it's the medical standard of care to provide it
immediately after the baby is delivered.
CONTINUED ON PAGE 9
ACLU BOOSTING VOTER
REGISTRATION AT CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES
By Leslie Fulbright
L her years of work with people with disabilities, Roxy Ortiz says voter
registration is something that has historically been overlooked. And that's
exactly why she takes her job so seriously ee
At the Eastern Los Angeles Regional Center, Ortiz is
working with the ACLU to remove some of the barriers to
voting for people with disabilities. By increasing awareness
and providing the tools, she now ensures that every client
of the center is given the opportunity to register.
"Voter registration was not done on a consistent basis,
we barely had any registration cards," says Ortiz, the cen-
ter's Information and Training Specialist. "Now it is built
in to our system. We are ordering cards by the thousands
in 10 different languages."
The ACLU of California's Voting Rights Project has
been working with people like Ortiz throughout the
state to implement the National Voter Registration Act
(NVRA). The law, aimed at removing some of the obstacles
to participation, requires state government agencies to of-
fer registration to people when they access public assistance
or use regional centers that provide services to people with
disabilities.
CONTINUED ON PAGE 9
eA Ae US
BILL OF RIGHTS DAY PHOTOS BY MARTHA WINNACKER
BILL OF RIGHTS DAY
t this year's Bill of Rights Day celebration Dec. 13, 2015, at Impact Hub in Oakland, we
onored two leaders in the fight for civil rights and civil liberties: Dorsey Nunn, for his
commitment to the rights of the formerly incarcerated, especially in voting rights and for catalyzing
the nation's "ban the box" movement; and Dr. Milton Estes, for his leadership and decades of service
to the ACLU both in Northern California and nationally.
The following is an excerpt of Dorsey Nunns speech accepting
the Chief Justice Earl Warren Civil Liberties Award at the
ACLU of Northern Californias annual Bill of Rights Day
celebration.
H0x00B0* anybody here ever told a lie? Raise your hand if
you ever told a lie.
Now suppose I would go around introducing you, "This
is so-and-so, the liar."
Suppose I would do that to you. Then expect that you're
going to get a good business deal. `Then expect to get a decent
partner who believes you every time you come home late.
Membership ($25 and up) includes a subscription to
the ACLU News. For membership information call
(415) 621-2493 or visit www.aclunc.org
Beverly Tucker CHAIR
Abdi Soltani EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Rebecca Farmer EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Gigi Pandian MANAGING EDITOR
DESIGNER
Jessie Seyfer PROOFREADER
39 IDeuaen Soret, Sem Franco, CA O41 11
(562122493 |e piren@eruNne ore
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Sometimes when I travel they ask me, "Are you a return-
ing citizen?" My question is much deeper. My question is,
"Am I an American citizen?"
Because if I don't have the right to vote, I don't partici-
pate on juries, I don't get to run for office, I don't have the
basic rights that come with citizenship, I don't know if 'm
a returning citizen.
So when I'm checking off that box that asks, "Have you
ever been convicted?" I know it's something structurally
being asked of me. It's not necessarily being checked off by
other people.
In 1975, I decided to return from San Quentin Prison to
my community as an asset instead of a liability.
So I'm extremely grateful for this award. 'm even more
grateful for a continuous relationship with the ACLU.
I'm grateful for last year when we expanded the right to
vote for 40 - 60,000 Californians. ''m grateful for when
we expanded the right to vote for people in the county jail
several years ago.
I don't go to bed filled with hatred. I don't generally
go to bed filled with the notion of discriminating against
people. I don't go to bed with that. But when you ask me,
"are you rehabilitated?" I want to yell out, "Are yall?"
After 9/11, how many of us become un-American? |
think that we're making too many people not Americans.
And we need to think about: how did your neighbor next
door become not American based on 9/11? I may not be an
American, based on how I'm treated regularly by society. @
Dorsey Nunn is the executive director of Legal Services for
Prisoners with Children and the co-founder of All of Us or
None, a grassroots organization that fights for the rights of
formerly and currently incarcerated people and their families.
LEFT: Chief Justice Earl Warren Civil Liberties Award
recipeient Dorsey Nunn
ABOVE: ACLU-NC Board Chair Beverly Tucker with the winner of
the Lola Hanzel Courageous Advocacy Award, Dr. Milton Estes.
BELOW: The Santa Clara Valley Chapter accepting the
Dick Criley Activism Award.
"
OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Cie or Nomen @alitenmatciapteneiders came
together in regional meetings over three weekends
in January and February to learn about organizing
opportunities and to begin to plan for the next year of
local advocacy. In the coming weeks, chapter leaders will
work closely with staff and community partners to develop
strategic campaigns in key issue areas:
Government Spying and Surveillance: An
increasing number of cities and counties are acquiring
surveillance equipment like drones, stingrays (cell site
simulators), automatic license plate readers and specialized
facial recognition software-with nearly no public input or
oversight. This equipment is often purchased using grant
funds from the federal government or private companies.
`The lack of oversight and transparency in the adoption
of these technologies means that there is nobody to hold
accountable for purchasing the equipment, and that the
public does not know how the technologies are being
employed in the community. Chapter leaders are working
with local elected officials to pass ordinances that ensure
proper oversight and accountability when surveillance
technologies are adopted (like the one available at
aclunc.org/smartaboutsurveillance).
Immigration:
implementing policies that allow federal Immigration and
County sheriffs are increasingly
Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers access to jails and to
information about people who are incarcerated. Through a
federal program called the Priority Enforcement Program
(PEP), people are being separated from their families and
placed into immigration detention and deportation pro-
ceedings-often under deplorable conditions. PEP claims
to prioritize individuals who have committed certain crimes
for deportation, but in reality, people are being detained
for things like traffic violations or reporting crimes. Local
chapters will work in coalition with other advocates to help
break these dangerous collaborations between local law en-
forcement and federal immigration officials.
Police Practices: Structural racism and growing
economic inequality have led to systemic use of policing,
surveillance, and mass incarceration as solutions to eco-
nomic and social problems. Unarmed people of color are
being killed at the hands of law enforcement with alarming
frequency across the country, poor and homeless people are
having their assets permanently confiscated by the police
without committing a crime or even being arrested, and
ACLU CHAPTERS TAKE STRATEGIC ACTION
California maintains the most secretive laws in the country,
preventing public access to information about law enforce-
ment misconduct. Chapter leaders will work with existing
grassroots movements to change state policies to lift the veil
of secrecy over police misconduct and ensure that local law
enforcement activities are transparent and accountable to
the public, including through advocacy to pass SB 1286 by
State Sen. Mark Leno.
LGBTQ Students' Rights: Remarkable strides
have been made toward full equality for LGBTQ (lesbian,
gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer) people, including
the right for all loving couples to marry. Still, LGBTQ stu-
dents often face bullying and unfair treatment by teachers
and administrators, and do not see people like themselves
reflected in their curricula. California has excellent state
laws to ensure that schools are welcoming and inclusive
of LGBTQ students, especially in comprehensive sexual
health and HIV prevention education, but these laws must
be implemented on a district-by-district basis. Chapters
will work with parents, teachers, students, and other com-
munity members to ensure that districts are implementing
sexual health education policies and curricula that create
welcoming and affirming spaces for all students. @
BACK TO SCHOOL IN SILICON VALLEY
ast fall, the ACLU of Northern California joined our Freedom Circle supporters in
Palo Alto to discuss the issue of youth and police, with special focus on police in
schools and the impact on students with disabilities and students of color.
On hand to lend their expertise and insight were ACLU of Northern California Racial
at giving @aclunc.org.
Justice Project Fellow Nayna Gupta, ACLU Disability Counsel Susan Mizner, and ACLU
of Northern California Executive Director Abdi Soltani.
Tf you would like information about the Freedom Circle, please contact Noah Maier
a
Top row, left to right: Abdi Soltani, Carol Rhoads, Keating Rhoads, Nayna Gupta, Susan Mizner.
Bottom row, left to right: Riaz Moledina, Noah Maier, Lily Moledina, Paul Gilbert, Susan Mizner.
EVENT PHOTOS BY ALISON GARCIA
NEW REPORT FINDS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
ABUSES IN CALIFORNIA JAILS
By Bethany Woolman
he government has an obligation to provide
medical care to the people it incarcerates.
Sadly, that definition too often fails to include
reproductive health. A new report by the ACLU
of California has found that jails are putting
people's health at risk by denying, delaying, and
ignoring crucial reproductive health care. Repro-
ductive Health Behind Bars in California exam-
ines the current landscape of reproductive health
in California jails, and recommends a range of
policy changes. The report is also accompanied
by a Know Your Rights guide, and an assessment
tool to help jail administrators improve their
policies.
"Across California, we're seeing that accessing
reproductive health care becomes a frightening
and traumatic experience for people incarcerated
in county jails," said Melissa Goodman, Direc-
wor or une UGE, Geneler 6c Repnocmneukye
Justice Projects at the 1@bU of soutien Calie
fornia. "Jails need to make concrete changes to
make sure that they are meeting the reproductive
health needs of the people in their care."
The ACLU compiled reports from people who
were shackled while pregnant, weren't given the
food they needed to have a healthy pregnancy,
were forced to sleep on dangerous top bunks,
and were denied prenatal and emergency visits
with medical staff. In one especially disturbing
instance, a woman reported that after she went
to the jail clinic with intense abdominal pain,
the nurses failed to find a fetal heartbeat but still
Sent Memb acke Tommie celle pceaticeama (c)) (Grdhy
wasnt on shift.
The report identifies a wide array of problems
with policies and practices in jails, including
delayed and denied abortion access, dangerous
prenatal conditions, and denial of menstrual sup-
plies and lactation accommodations.
Reform is important, legally necessary, and
feasible. Two years ago the ACLU of Southern
California uncovered a range of problems-from
abortion delays to illegal shackling-at Los
Tas) Ta a aT
eC Se
A REPORT FROM THE ACLU OF CALIFORNIA, JAN 2016
Report cover illustration courtesy of Micah Bazant for Strong Families.
ACROSS CALIFORN A WE RE SEEING 7 FAT
ACCESSING REPRODUCIHIVE HEALTH CARE
BECOMES A FRIGHTENING AND TRAUMATIC
EXPERIENCE FOR PEOPLE INCARCERATED IN
COUNTY JAIES.
Angeles County's women's jail, the largest
women's facility in the country. The ACLU
worked collaboratively with the Los Angeles
Sheriffs department on positive reforms that
improved access to medical care and other
necessary accommodations for pregnant
people, including housing. The collaboration
also initiated the launch of a pilot program
allowing family members to pick up pumped
breastmilk for delivery to children at home.
The ACLU is continuing to monitor the
county to ensure that change in policy
translates into real change in practice.
The new report and accompanying assess-
ment tool provide California jails an op-
portunity to look at the law and at medical
best practices, and make concrete changes to
their policies. In addition to changing writ-
ten policies and training staff to implement
them, jails need to start collecting robust
data on reproductive health needs and out-
comes. Currently, this crucial data is widely
untracked and unavailable.
The report also recommends that jails up-
date their policies to protect the reproductive
health of transgender and gender noncon-
forming people.
Mass incarceration is a national crisis, with
an especially harmful effect on poor com-
munities and communities of color. Many
people are stuck in jail who otherwise would
not be, simply because they can't afford to
pay bail. In addition to improving condi-
tions for people who remain incarcerated,
communities should be supporting alterna-
tives to incarceration.
Bethany Woolman is a Communications Strate-
gist at the ACLU of Northern California.
Get more information at WWW.ACLUNC.ORG/CHAPTERS
or by calling (415) 621-2493 x355
By Irene Rojas-Carroll
OUR KNOW YOUR RIGHTS RESOURCES:
BUILDING CONNECTIONS ACROSS CALIFORNIA
ne of the most important ways people relate to the ACLU is through understanding their own rights.
According to Tessa D'Arcangelew, who is an ACLU organizer and works with chapters all over Northern
California, Know Your Rights materials are crucial to her work. "Know Your Rights pamphlets, presentations,
and all kinds of materials are one of the most digestible and personal ways that I have to share information to our
members and people we work with," says D'Arcangelew.
D'Arcangelew recently received a note from a young
woman in San Francisco who works at an after-school
program for at-risk high school students. This person re-
membered D'Arcangelew's Know Your Rights workshop
on how to interact with police at the ACLU of California's
2014 Conference and Lobby Day; she was so inspired by
that training that she wanted to offer the same one to the
students she works with.
That workshop used our blue and yellow wallet cards
on your rights when you interact with police as a basis for
conversation.
Dealing with police can be scary and confusing. There are
four "magic phrases" we encourage people to use; these are
simple phrases that anyone can repeat when they're stopped
by police in order to invoke their rights under the law.
cent Am I free to go?
e I wish to remain silent.
cent I want to speak to a lawyer.
e I do not consent to a search.
In the workshop, D'Arcangelew leads participants
through practicing actually saying these phrases aloud.
"People need to know that it's important to ask these ques-
tions and say these words to police if they wish to, even if
you haven't done anything wrong," says D'Arcangelew.
Know Your Rights materials are also a way to make sense
of the gap that unfortunately often exists between legal
requirements and real life. Police do violate people's funda-
mental rights all the time, and even abuse people who do
Three of the "magic phrases" taught at Know Your Rights trainings.
assert their rights. These are not colorblind occurrences. We
saw this in the case of Sandra Bland, a Black Lives Matter
activist who knew to assert her rights, and did so, when
a police officer pulled her over and arrested her. She ulti-
mately died in custody.
`The resources that we had on hand also opened the door
for participants to share their personal experiences with po-
lice. The important thing for everyone to know is that it's not
on you if a police officer engages in misconduct or uses exces-
sive force. Asserting your rights to a police officer might have
consequences, but we know also that police harm people
even when they're not objecting to the officer's conduct.
Using these magic phrases and using the KYR materials
as a basis to create interactive and participatory trainings
helps make legal concepts come to life.
Our organizers also use Know Your Rights materials to
share with chapters, as starting points for other workshops,
and to share at events where the ACLU of Northern Cali-
fornia has a presence through tabling. Knowledge is power.
When people know their rights they can better protect
themselves, their family, and their community. Find our
materials out online at aclunc.org/KYR. @
Irene Rojas-Carroll is the Communications Associate at the
ACLU of Northern California.
RAIDS? DEPORTATIONS? IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS
WITH ICE AND BORDER PATROL ABUSES
Excerpts from a Know Your Rights publication. Read more at www.aclunc.org/kyr.
Re deportation actions have created a lot of
ear. Many people call these actions "raids," but in
California, we haven't seen mass arrests in neighborhoods
or workplaces, which is what a lot of people think of when
they hear the word "raids." Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) also says it is not conducting raids in
California. However, ICE is still engaging in deportations
and other enforcement practices. ICE's enforcement
practices tear families apart and undermine community
trust in law enforcement.
Many violate the Fourth Amendment's protection
against unreasonable searches and seizures, the con-
stitutional guarantee of due process, and the constitu-
tional guarantee of equal protection and freedom from
discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and national
origin.
Immigration detainers
An ICE detainer-or "immigration hold"-asks local jail
or other law enforcement agency to detain an individual for
an additional 48 hours (excluding weekends and holidays)
after their release date.
ICE's use of detainers to imprison people without due pro-
cess and often without any charges pending or probable cause
has raised serious constitutional concerns. ICE is now sup-
posed to limit its use of detainers, but they may still use them.
Know your rights if ICE confronts you
Independent of your citizenship status, you have constitu-
tional rights!
cent Don't open your doors. ICE cannot come in to your
home unless they have a signed search warrant or you let
them in. Ask them to pass the warrant under the door
Ua
before you open. An arrest warrant for one person is not
enough to come in, unless it also says the officers have a
right to enter or search that particular address.
cent Stay silent. ICE can use anything you say against
you in your immigration case, so claim your right to
remain silent! Say, "I want to speak to a lawyer and
choose to remain silent."
cent Don't Sign. Be careful what you sign. ICE often asks
people to sign forms agreeing to be deported without
first seeing a judge.
cent Fight back! If detained, don't give up hope! Get a
trustworthy lawyer and explore all options to fight your
case. You'll have a much better chance of stopping a de-
portation. Find lawyers and organizations that provide
free and low-cost help. If you or a loved one believe
you have been unjustly detained, call the TRUST Act
hotline at (844) 878-7801. @
PANDIAN
GIGI
VICTORY! FRESNO SUSPENDS USE OF
SOCIAL MEDIA SURVEILLANCE SOFTWARE
he Fresno Police Department has stopped using social media surveillance software after the ACLU of
Northern California discovered that the department was secretly using the surveillance technology.
Social media surveillance software comes in many forms,
but it generally works by automatically scanning huge
batches of publicly available posts on networks like Twit-
ter, Instagram, and Facebook. This kind of surveillance
can place people under suspicion simply for speaking their
mind online.
After combing through a pile of documents obtained
through a public records act request, the ACLU discovered
that Fresno police had been using an especially offensive
piece of software called MediaSonar that had dire implica-
tions for local activists. Marketing emails from the compa-
ny encouraged Fresno officers to identify "threats to public
safety" by tracking #BlackLivesMatter-related hashtags like
#dontshoot and #imunarmed.
The department was also using a different, but equally
troubling, piece of software called Beware. According to
news reports, Beware's mysterious algorithm was assigning
"threat levels" of green, yellow, and red to residents-based
in part on what they wrote online. Marketed as a source of
insight for officers on the ground, this software was deeply
flawed. For instance, a Fresno city council member was re-
cently incensed to learn that Beware listed his residence at
threat level "yellow."
`The documents we received from Fresno raise a number
of unanswered questions about social media surveillance
at the local level. How many people are being surveilled?
PROPESTORS SHGULDN and HAVE
TO WONDER WHETHER WHAT
THEY WRITE ONUINE OR POS] ON
SOCIAL MEDIA WILL BRAND THEM
AS A THREAT IN THE EYES OF LAW
ENEORCEMENT.
How long is their data being stored? How do these intrusive
programs gather and interpret information? Communities
have a right to this information.
Fresno residents are right to demand reform, including
the adoption of an ordinance that ensures the public has a
meaningful chance to weigh in before decisions about this
or any other surveillance technology are made.
Social media monitoring is part of a pattern of un-
checked surveillance. It's yet another surveillance tool being
used without transparency or accountability. And it risks
targeting communities that are already vulnerable to police
misconduct-especially communities of color.
During the Iraq War, the ACLU sued the Fresno police
department for infiltrating a local peace group. Today, pro-
testors shouldn't have to wonder whether what they write
online or post on social media will brand them as a threat in
the eyes of law enforcement. The government shouldn't be
collecting a digital record of people's lives. And police sur-
veillance plans shouldn't be rushed forward with the public
left out of the loop.
Technology is changing the way we communicate and
organize around powerful ideas. At the forefront of these
innovations are movements like #BlackLivesMatter. While
the way in which our society expresses itself is shifting, the
principles of the First Amendment remain unchanged.
Advances in technology are not an excuse for new forms of
unaccountable surveillance. @
VICTORY: NO NEW JAIL
IN SAN FRANCISCO
In December, the ACLU of Northern California
joined community members and local groups in
speaking out against San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee's
plan to spend upwards of $240 million on a new jail.
The ACLU advocated that instead of pouring more
money into mass incarceration, the city needed to
be investing in innovative and successful diversion
programs that promote rehabilitation.
"Sait (eaincise(R) lias am excess or jail lmeals, [owt
has a long waiting list for residential mental health
treatment beds," said staff attorney Micaela Davis.
"We should expand treatment programs for addic-
tion, and fund residential and outpatient programs
that give people suffering from mental illness the
treatment they need." After sustained and inspiring
public pressure by local community groups and ac-
tivists, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted
unanimously to reject funding for the new jail.
SPOTLIGHT ON JAILS ADVOCACY
FEDERAL INVESTIGATION
NEEDED IN ORANGE
COUNTY JAILS
Under the Fifth Amendment, anyone in police
custody has the right to be advised by an attorney
during questioning. But in Orange County, jailers
and prosecutors have apparently been circumvent-
ing that right for several decades by orchestrating
the use of jailhouse informants to illegally question
people about their cases.
In November 2015, the ACLU called on the De-
partment of Justice to open an investigation into
the corruption. "We estimate that thousands of
people in Orange County may have had their civil
rights violated while navigating a criminally dys-
functional justice system," said ACLU of Northern
California Criminal Justice Policy Director Ana
Zamora.
THOUSANDS OF PECPEE IN MAY WAVE HAD I HE R
CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATED WHILE NAVIGATING A CRIMINALLY
DYSPUNCTIONAL JUS iiCE SyYsiEM.
/
ae
VICTORY: BUTTE COUNTY
THINKS TWICE ABOUT
FLEECING INMATES' FAMILIES
TO PAY FOR NEW JAIL
Last year, Butte County was one of 32 California
counties that submitted bids for state financing to
build new jails. Butte, however, was the only county
to try to use Inmate Welfare Fund money to pay
the county' required contribution. Inmate Wel-
fare Fund money is raised mostly from surcharges
on phone calls between inmates and their families.
Jacking up rates on these calls amounts to a tax on
inmate families, which discourages families from
staying in touch with their loved ones in jail. It's a
tempting source of funds for sheriffs to pay for all
types of things unrelated to inmates' welfare, but do-
ing so is highly unethical.
Reports of these Inmate Welfare Funds being
misused are widespread. After the ACLU sent a let-
ter warning the county that their plan was illegal, the
Board of State and Community Corrections voted to
encourage Butte County to find other funds, recog-
nizing that using Inmate Welfare Fund money for jail
construction is inappropriate and bad public policy.
Butte County has now agreed to use local law enforce-
ment assistance funds for their contribution to the jail
construction instead of the inmate welfare fund. @
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA -
LEGAL UPDATES
By Bethany Woolman
VICTORY FOR ACCOUNTABILITY:
SAN FRANCISCO APPROVES BODY
CAMERA POLICY
In December 2015, the San Francisco Police Commis-
sion approved a policy for police body cameras to ensure
they are used as a tool for accountability, not abuse. The
new policy limits an officer's ability to see footage before
making a statement. The ACLU, along with the Council
on American Islamic Relations, Color of Change, and
Asian Americans Advancing Justice, sent a letter to the
Commission arguing that allowing officers to see footage
of critical incidents before making a statement gives dis-
honest officers a chance to tailor their stories to the tape.
The letter also called for clear rules that compel proactive
release of footage that is of public interest.
VICTORY: REAL CHANGES TO
FACEBOOK'S `REAL NAME' POLICY
Facebook announced concrete changes to its harmful "real
name" policy in December 2015, after ongoing advocacy
by a coalition of groups including the ACLU. The changes
are meant to reduce the risks of abusive reporting and
lockouts of users from the site. For years, the user name
policy excluded a number of communities-transgender
people whose names did not match their state ID card,
survivors of domestic violence who couldn' use their real
names, whistleblowers: reporting abuses of power who used
pseudonyms for protection, and Native Americans who
found that their names were routinely declared invalid by
Facebook's system.
VICTORY FOR SEX ED IN
REDDING SCHOOLS
Parents in Redding learned last December that their
eighth-graders' school would be teaching that "sex is like
a fire'-dangerous and scary, outside the "fireplace" of
marriage. In addition to its deeply problematic language,
the curricula in question stigmatized LGBTQ students,
contained no instruction on contraception other than
- abstinence, and fell far short of covering topics required
by the state of California for comprehensive sexual health
education.
The ACLU-NC sent a letter to the district warning that
abstinence-only sex education violates California law. In
response, the district notified the ACLU that they would
hold off on the planned curriculum and reevaluate their
sexual health education. "Abstinence-only sex ed pro-
grams are notorious for using tragically bad sex metaphors
to push their harmful agenda," said ACLU of Northern
California Reproductive Justice Attorney Jennifer Chou.
"This kind of selective and misleading curriculum is
strictly prohibited."
SOUS
KNCWS
ie
Ty
Taylor Victor, who was sent home from her High School
in Manteca for wearing this shirt.
VICTORY FOR FREE SPEECH:
T.V. V. BEUKELMAN
Taylor Victor was just beginning her junior year at Sierra
High School in Manteca when she was sent home from
school for wearing a shirt that read "Nobody Knows ?'m
a Lesbian." School officials told her she wasn't allowed to
display her "personal choices and beliefs," and that the
shirt violated the dress code because it was "disruptive,
promoted sex, promoted sexuality, and was an open
invitation to sex."
Taylor contacted the ACLU of Northern California and
reported that her free speech rights had been violated. In
February, the ACLU-NC settled the ensuing lawsuit with
the Manteca Unified School District. The settlement allows
Taylor to wear her shirt without threat of punishment or
retaliation. It also updates the dress code district-wide to
make it clear that students can express their own identity
and their support for other students' identities-including
identities of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, and
other protected groups. District administrators will be re-
quired to attend professional development training to bring
them up to date on their duty to protect free speech.
"At the end of the day, I just want other kids to know that
it's okay to be yourself at school," wrote Taylor in a blog post
for the ACLU. "It's okay to stand up for what you believe in."
VICTORY FOR WOMEN IN COMBAT:
HEGAR, ET AL. Vv. CARTER
The Department of Defense announced in December
that it plans to open all military combat jobs to women,
with no exceptions for any branch of the armed services.
Almost four years ago, in November 2012, the ACLU filed
a lawsuit on behalf of four servicewomen and the Service
Women's Action Network against the Department of De-
fense for its blanket exclusion that kept women from com-
peting for combat jobs, units, and schools. "I'm thrilled the
most qualified candidates for all military jobs will be able to
serve in critical areas regardless of gender," said MJ Hegar,
plaintiff in Hegar v. Carter. "In time, people will stop look-
ing surprised when they meet a female combat veteran."
The ACLU is continuing the case to ensure that the
integration of women into previously closed positions goes
smoothly and that women are not prevented from accessing
combat roles based on artificial hurdles not imposed on
their male counterparts.
ACLU CALLS FOR FEDERAL
INVESTIGATION INTO SYSTEMIC
BIAS IN THE SFPD
In January, the ACLU of Northern California and the
ACLU Disability Rights Program sent a letter to the
US Department of Justice urging a federal pattern and
practice investigation into the San Francisco Police
Department for systemic civil rights violations. Those
violations include the killing of Mario Woods, a young
Black disabled man.
"Mario's death at the hands of police on December 2,
2015 is unfortunately only one instance of the long-stand-
ing and deep-rooted failures in the workings of the SFPD,
especially as it interacts with communities of color, Black
people in particular, and people with disabilities," said
ACLU-NC Senior Counsel Alan Schlosser.
In February, the Department of Justice and the SFPD
announced a voluntary and non-binding review of SFPD
policies, but not its biased practices. The systemic problems
at the core of the SFPD show that a Department of Justice
investigation must address the SFPD's workings as a whole,
and require enforceable changes, in order to be effective.
MEDICAL MARIJUANA BANS:
BYRD V. FRESNO and
KIRBY Vv. FRESNO
The ACLU of Northern California litigated two suits
against the City and County of Fresno over bans on the
cultivation and storage of medical marijuana. The bans
are inconsistent with California's 1996 voter-approved
Compassionate Use Act, which allows seriously ill pa-
tients and caregivers to grow medical marijuana. Cali-
fornia courts have upheld the Fresno bans in both cases.
In February, the California Supreme Court denied re-
view. Except for the criminal penalties, the bans will
remain in place. @
_. - ACLU NEWS - SPRING 2016 7
e
YOU CAN
DEFEND
FREEDOM
Between now and June 30, by
adding the ACLU to your will, you
can leave a legacy of liberty for
generations to come and defend
our freedom today.
nee Geng meee Giclee
Snel a areren eel ae pace) (eae eel
future plans
GIG) | 1
matching donation today from
Gai olwlaliny wae
receive a 20% cash
Our generous challenge donor.
For simple bequest language
rer in@iuce ia Our | ane Ion
information on other gifts that
Quality tor tie Legacy Challenge,
visit www.aclu.org/legacy or
cell (45)! 293 G3G7.
INMUEISIGAIN (CUVITE Esler Mies UNTIN
@
be NG
y
SPOTLIGHT ON BETH DAWSON,
DESILVER LEGACY SOCIETY
MEMBER
We Beth Dawson travels from her home in Menlo
Park to visit her politically conservative family in
Texas, she always looks forward to their conversations
around the dinner table.
A Texas native, Dawson has supported the ACLU for
almost 15 years. "The ACLU has shown me how I can talk
with my family about the issues I care about in a way that
crosses party lines," she explains. "For example, we can talk
about economic inequality
and privacy from govern-
ment surveillance, and have
a really substantive conver-
sation rather than engaging
in partisan disagreements.
iors ecteaticctult nicest incre @leU)
for giving me a way to talk
productively with my fam-
ily about issues and prin-
ciples I care deeply about."
After supporting the AC-
LU's work for more than
a decade, Dawson and her
partner Greg felt that it was time to do more. That's why
they chose to make a bequest to bolster the ACLU's future
advocacy. When deciding to create their legacy with the
ACLU, "we thought about our values as people and how
our estate could further these values," Dawson said. "Since
we don't have children or grandchildren of our own, we like
to think of the ACLU almost as our kid!"
When Dawson told the ACLU about their future gift,
she and Greg were welcomed to the DeSilver Legacy Soci-
ety, a group of more than 5,000 supporters nationwide who
have provided for the ACLU in their estate plans. Legacy
society members are invited to our annual DeSilver Society
Luncheon in San Francisco, and receive special updates on
the ACLU's work. "I am so happy to be part of the ACLU's
legacy society," Dawson said. "Your speakers are eye-
opening and help us make connections between issues we
wouldn't have otherwise, and learn about issues the ACLU
has taken on that we wouldn't otherwise know about-like
NOW Tie eee Wie pe 4
GOOD JOB OF STEWARDING OUR
BEQUEST [0 ADVANCE PREEDOM
AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS"
-BETH DAWSON, DESILVER LEGACY
SOCIETY MEMBER
how a county not having enough public defenders affects
how many people are incarcerated, whether or not they are
guilty." Further, "I can count on the ACLU to accurately
and honestly report on current events, and this education
helps me decide how I want to vote," Dawson said.
As an educator, Dawson is committed to helping students
build the foundations of their own future success. Making
a legacy gift to the ACLU is another way that she is able
to invest in a more just and
equitable future for younger
generations, both here in
Northern California and in
her home state of Texas. "I
know the ACLU will do a
good job of stewarding our
bequest to advance freedom
and constitutional rights,"
she said. "In an ideal world,
we wouldnt need _ the
ACLU. In the world we live
in, though, I feel a lot more
secure knowing that the
ACLU is always a step ahead in defending our civil liber-
ties. Because when it comes to rights, you don't know what
youve got till it's gone!" @
From now until June 30, 2016, you can create your
own legacy for liberty and take advantage of a special
opportunity to advance justice and equality right now.
By making a gift to the ACLU in your estate plan and
telling us of this gift, a generous matching donor will
make an immediate cash gift equal to up to 20 percent
of the value of your gift to the ACLU today.
To learn more about how you can participate in the
Legacy Challenge, please contact Rhiannon Lewis,
Planned Giving Officer at (415) 293-6367 or rlewis@
aclunc.org.
8 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA oo
CATHOLIC HOSPITALS
Early on in her pregnancy, Chamorro decided with
her doctor that she would get a tubal ligation during her
scheduled C-section. She didn't expect to have problems
accessing such a common and safe procedure.
But Chamorro's hospital refused her doctor's request to
perform the procedure, citing religious directives written by
the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops that clas-
sify tubal ligation as "intrinsically evil." For Chamorro, there
are no hospitals within a 70-mile radius of her home that
have birthing facilities and do not follow these directives.
"This is an incredibly common and safe method of
contraception, especially for women who are scheduled
for a C-section," said Dr. Pratima Gupta, a board-certified
OB/GYN and member of the organization Physicians for
Reproductive Health. "Many women prefer postpartum
tubal ligation to other birth control alternatives because it
is a highly effective method that will only prolong surgery
time a few minutes."
In the hope that the courts would reverse the hospital's
decision, the ACLU and the law firm of Covington and Burl-
ing LLP filed a lawsuit in December against Dignity Health
on behalf of Chamorro and Physicians for Reproductive
Health. The suit argues that the application of religious di-
rectives to Ms. Chamorro and to other patients unlawfully
disrupts the patient-doctor relationship and ultimately
denies patients care.
Unfortunately, Chamorro was ultimately denied a tubal
(continued from page 1)
DIGNITY HEALTH and MERC?
MEDICAL CENIER 5EFUSED
CHAMORRO S DOCTOR S
REQUEST 10 PERTORM A TUBAL
EIGAT ON ClliNG RELIG OUS
DIRECTIVES WRITTEN BY [HE
UNITES slAles CONFERENCE
OF CA HOLIC Blan UPs 1HAI
CLASSIFY [UBAL LIGATION AS
OINTRINSICAP EY Evil
ligation during her January C-section when the judge in
the case denied the ACLU's emergency motion on her be-
half. If she chooses to go forward with the same procedure
now, she will have to undergo an additional surgery, which
involves general anesthesia and multiple incisions and is
not without risk.
The ACLU has filed an amended complaint in the case,
seeking a declaration that Ms. Chamorro's rights were
violated, as well as continuing to seek relief on behalf of
patients of member doctors of Physicians for Reproductive
Health.
"The refusal of hospitals to allow doctors to perform
basic health procedures based solely on religious doctrine
presents a real threat to a woman's ability to access health
care," said Elizabeth Gill, senior staff attorney at the ACLU
of Northern California. "Patients seeking medical care
from institutions that receive public funding and are open
to the general public should not have to worry that reli-
gious doctrine rather than medical judgment will dictate
what care they receive."
Dignity Health is the fifth largest healthcare system
in the country and the largest hospital provider in
California, with 29 hospitals across the state. It receives
significant funding from the State of California-in-
cluding millions of dollars a year in government grants
and billions of dollars a year in Medicare and Medicaid
payments.
Tea OF ine YS lewgest negai@l, sree tin die U.S, are
Catholic-sponsored, and nearly one of nine hospital beds
in the country is in a Catholic facility. Their hospital chains
have rapidly expanded over the past 15 years, and their in-
terference with the doctor-patient relationship is blocking
patients access to basic reproductive healthcare across the
country. In spite of the disappointing ruling, the case is
moving forward.
ACLU BOOSTING VOTER REGISTRATION
"Our work is about creating access for voters who are
overlooked and getting them engaged in the democratic
process," says Jess Jollett, a communications strategist who
works on the ACLU of California's Voting Rights Project.
"The thousands of people now using these services were his-
torically left out of the political process because they didn't
have access. In some cases, they experienced discrimination
and outright exclusion from the ballot box. Now they are
active participants in our democracy."
Though the NVRA was signed into law in 1993, enforc-
ing it has been an ongoing struggle. The goal was to increase
voter participation by making registration more accessible
and easy to navigate for people with disabilities and people
living in poverty.
Immediately after the law was enacted, registration
reached an all-time high. Across the nation, registrations
at public assistance agencies reached 2.6 million. But over
the next decade, it began a steady decline reaching a low of
about 500,000 in 2006. Investigations revealed widespread
noncompliance in implementing the law.
Across the country, civil and voting rights groups
began threatening litigation to get states to enforce the
law. Here, the ACLU of California Voting Rights team
decided to try a different approach. The team worked
with state and local agencies to figure out how to fix
(continued from page 1)
the problem by identifying areas where these agencies
needed support and then helping them streamline the
process. Ihe ACLU provided support and training mate-
rials so the agencies could embed voter registration into
everyday practices.
The project started in San Diego, where the ACLU of
California Voting Rights Project is based. In that county
alone, registration had dropped 93 percent in the 10 years
since NVRA was made law. In 2011, voter registrations at
San Diego public assistance agencies averaged just a few
dozen per month despite record numbers of applications
for services.
We worked with San Diego County's public assistance,
agencies for people with disabilities and election officials
OUR WORK IS ABOUT CREATING
ACCES FOR YOIEKS WHO ARE
OVERLOGKED AND GEI TING THEM
ENGAGED IN THE DEMOCRATIC
POC Ss
to boost the numbers. The results were dramatic. In the
seven months leading up to the 2012 election, these agen-
cies registered more voters than they had in the past 12
years combined.
Then in 2013, we expanded the implementation project
to 20 more counties throughout the state.
The strategy is working. There has been a more than
250 percent increase in voter registrations in public assis-
tance and disability assistance agencies in California. Reg-
istrations went from about 30,000 in 2011 to 110,000
in 2015. Applicants and clients in all of these offices are
now asked if they would like to register every time they
apply for or renew services, or change their address. They
are also given assistance filling out the registration card if
they need it.
Across California, the ACLU's NVRA Implementation
project is opening up opportunities and playing a critical
role in bringing people to the ballot box. Tens of thousands
of people have been registered to vote through these agen-
cies and awareness continues to grow.
"It's been so gratifying to watch the awareness increasing
in our community," says Ortiz.
Leslie Fulbright is a Communications Strategist at the ACLU
of Northern California.